On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
> George,
>
> Just did a diff to your latest code on your webpage. Looks like I had the
> latest. Attached are the updated TSWEEP.DO along with ASCPIX.CO file.
>
> To install from BASIC:
>
> clear 256,58000
> loadm "ascpix"
George,
Just did a diff to your latest code on your webpage. Looks like I had
the latest. Attached are the updated TSWEEP.DO along with ASCPIX.CO file.
To install from BASIC:
clear 256,58000
loadm "ascpix"
I will document ASCPIX separately.
Ken
On 4/23/17 5:17 PM, George Rimakis wrote:
It always amazes me how much time it takes to write documentation for
software!
Ken
On 4/23/17 2:34 PM, George Rimakis wrote:
Hi Ken,
I'm not making any more change. Feel free to reach out to me directly.
I'd like to integrate this fully with my own graphics if I can.
~George
On Apr 23,
LOL!
Same here; couldn't resist tightening it up a bit myself but will happily use
your version.
Also a lot of opportunity to combine commands on one line to also save space
and a little time.
But it's a pretty neat piece of work all the same, and actually not as slow as
one might expect.
m
Hi George,
One thing I did when I was adding AsciiPixels was a tiny bit of code
optimization (perhaps I shouldn't have?):
1. I noticed you had duplicated code for printing "You Lose" and "You
Win". I combined these into a single routine with "Win" or "Lose"
passed as a string. Also I
It worked!
Ken
On 4/23/17 3:42 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
Okay, onlist it is.
I'm loading it up on a real M100 right now to test it. If it works, I
plan to write a bit of documentation on the routines and release it.
It has been over a year since I have worked on this library. As I
recal, I
Okay, onlist it is.
I'm loading it up on a real M100 right now to test it. If it works, I
plan to write a bit of documentation on the routines and release it. It
has been over a year since I have worked on this library. As I recal, I
had it working on M100/T102 and was working on getting
Some women are never satisfied! :D
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:21 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> Consider discussing on list if possible. I think several of us find it
> interesting.
>
> -- John.
>
Consider discussing on list if possible. I think several of us find it
interesting.
-- John.
Hi Ken,
I'm not making any more change. Feel free to reach out to me directly. I'd like
to integrate this fully with my own graphics if I can.
~George
> On Apr 23, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
>
> George,
>
> Are you still making major changes to Test Sweeper? I
George,
Are you still making major changes to Test Sweeper? I had a few minutes
on my hands this morning and integrated my AsciiPix routines into the
latest copy of TSWEEP.DO that I had. See attached photos of it running
in VirtualT. I haven't tried this on a real M100 yet, but I think it
thanks.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Brian White wrote:
> That's why I wrote:
>
> ---
> Order 1 flash chip per REX. (so, 3 chips if you want to build 3 boards)
>
> Pick any version of the chip which matches this pattern:
> AM29F800BB-##E*
>
> Where:
> ## = Speed: 90 or
That's why I wrote:
---
Order 1 flash chip per REX. (so, 3 chips if you want to build 3 boards)
Pick any version of the chip which matches this pattern:
AM29F800BB-##E*
Where:
## = Speed: 90 or lower (90 or faster)
E = Package: Only E, TSOP
* = Temperature range: Any
Example (what I got):
Brian, I am looking at the links on the page for building a REX. I am a
little confused when I look at the Flash link there are like 16 items that
come up on that link.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Brian White wrote:
> To build your own REX
>
> tandy.wiki/REX
>
>
tandy.wiki/REX
--
bkw
On Apr 22, 2017 12:05 AM, "Louis Lipp" wrote:
> Hi there! Since the subject came up, can anyone point me towards the plans
> of building the REX? I would love to see them.
> Also, are there plans for building any of the other goodies such as the
>
To build your own REX
tandy.wiki/REX
(Please feel free to improve this if you do it. It could be fleshed out a
lot more.)
For much simpler project just to make a mombo/rombo-alike
tandy.wiki/FigTronix
There's 3 boards there. You're interested in only the last 2. They both
have pros and cons.
Great Scott!!! ;-)
On 23 Apr 2017 3:41 p.m., "Russell Flowers" wrote:
> Maybe "Back to the Future"? :)
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Ken Pettit wrote:
>
>> "- The Future or Bust." ?? Interseting tagline for someone who plays
>> with Model 100's
Maybe "Back to the Future"? :)
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Ken Pettit wrote:
> "- The Future or Bust." ?? Interseting tagline for someone who plays with
> Model 100's ;)
>
> Ken
>
>
> On 4/21/17 11:19 PM, Lee Olivares wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to do the actual
The 1980s was the future. :)
On Apr 22, 2017 03:41, "Lee Olivares" wrote:
> Interseting tagline for someone who plays with Model 100's ;)
>
> You think most of the junk these kids got today is gonna last 30 years?
>
> Not without a bunch of iCloud errors I'd bet. :)
>
> - Lee
19 matches
Mail list logo