Thanks. On Linux you never know where the hints will pay off!
rcs
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:36 PM Kevin Becker wrote:
> I found the info below in my notes for building VirtualT on Fedora. I
> believe it was Fedora 29 at the time I made the notes. My current
> machines are Fedora 31 and runnin
SA:
CP/M too would be very cool! Are there references to it on the Bitchin100
site or is it someplace else?
Keep us posted with details on your build please.
Thanks,
rcs
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:29 PM Stephen Adolph wrote:
> REXCPM is an M100/T102 add on that provides p to 4 MB of switchabl
bkw:
Thanks, I'll try that!
rcs
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:13 PM Brian K. White wrote:
> Someone already copied it to github, and that's the copy I tried to build.
>
> The current/last compiled VirtualT still works on linux. That's why I
> didn't try too hard to build it. I just used the pre-bui
" I'm about to build a pile of them. Will update with progress. "
Good news! Congrats on the progress :-)
-- John.
I found the info below in my notes for building VirtualT on Fedora. I
believe it was Fedora 29 at the time I made the notes. My current
machines are Fedora 31 and running Wayland and I get some errors about
missing X libraries when trying to build fltk at the moment.
http://ijg.org/files/jpe
REXCPM is an M100/T102 add on that provides p to 4 MB of switchable RAM in
both OPTROM and std RAM memory. The internal RAM gets disabled in the
process.
It is capable of all of REX functions plus it supports CP/M. In fact it is
faster then REX.. no need for ram copiesswitch instead.
It is
Someone already copied it to github, and that's the copy I tried to build.
The current/last compiled VirtualT still works on linux. That's why I
didn't try too hard to build it. I just used the pre-built one. I was
just trying to use it to test my bootstrap updates to dlplus for
machines I don
Probably a first step is getting it into GitHub and then we can clean up
the build and README. I assume Ken will chime in with what he wants.
I've never failed to build it under Linux when I try but there are always
issues of installing dev libraries and setting defines.
-- John.
On Wed, Jan 1,
Does anyone have a Linux binary of VirtualT that still works? I put
Windows on a laptop just so I could run it, but I really live under Linux.
Happy 0x7E4,
rcs
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 4:44 PM Brian White wrote:
> I failed to build it the other day using the latest version of fltk, so it
> may n
When I went to build VirtualT under Linux some moons ago I got some advice
off this list about what older version of FLTK to use, but I haven't gotten
back to that yet. I can go find it later if it's not immediately obvious
in the archives (I haven't posted much here yet). I didn't explore the
Wi
I tried in vain to build VT with FTLK 2 some time last year or so and it
looked to be decidedly non-trivial. :(
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 4:44 PM Brian White wrote:
> I failed to build it the other day using the latest version of fltk, so it
> may need an older version. I didn't give it much effort
I failed to build it the other day using the latest version of fltk, so it
may need an older version. I didn't give it much effort so maybe it's not
much to fix, but it didn't build out of the box.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, 3:54 PM John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> I contributed a little code to VirtualT. B
I contributed a little code to VirtualT. But it's mainly Ken's work. I'm
fine with your plan. Are we still operating on sourceforge? I assume
eventually we should move to GitHub.
As to toolchain, if you can build it you're good. May want to learn to use
GDB if you don't already know it.
-- John.
13 matches
Mail list logo
