course).
>
> Jonathan
>
> Original Message
> From : bbrin...@gmail.com
> Date : 2023-12-13 - 22:34 (CEST)
> To : m...@bitchin100.com
> Subject : Re: [M100] 19.2Kbps on the Tandy 102
>
> Haha - Glad you like it Joshua if I do happen to make more or improve
BKW - is it worth it? Haha - that's an interesting thought process right
there. This is what I do to entertain myself so value of time and parts is
subjective. I'm gonna buy ten times the needed parts, build several
revisions of something and proudly display them all!
If we are gonna go explore "i
inux of course).
Jonathan
Original Message
>From : bbrin...@gmail.com
Date : 2023-12-13 - 22:34 (CEST)
To : m...@bitchin100.com
Subject : Re: [M100] 19.2Kbps on the Tandy 102
Haha - Glad you like it Joshua if I do happen to make more or improve on this
one I'll let you know. I don'
Is it worth trying to come up with some surgery bodge procedure to
upgrade a 256K unit to 512?
It's a very small change and although there is an added part and it's
tiny and not easy to solder wires to, it's probably actually possible to
cut a few traces and add the new part with fine wire-wra
> On Dec 13, 2023, at 1:34 PM, Brian Brindle wrote:
>
> building up a CP/M emulation environment on the TanPi
Feel free to reach out about this off-list. I've done a fair bit of fooling
around with the various CP/M emulation environments and have found RunCPM to
work *really* well as a daily
Haha - Glad you like it Joshua if I do happen to make more or improve on
this one I'll let you know. I don't exactly have ADD but what I do seem to
have is the inability to control what my current interests are and recently
it's been playing with CP/M on the M100, PX-8 and building up a CP/M
emulat
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:30 AM Brian Brindle wrote:
> I had this flagged as a flow control issue, guess it sort of is but what I
> was remembering is the T200 using the DTR signal for chip select on the
> tone generator.
>
Hmm, now that rings a bell. (Ba-dump-TI).
Maybe that's why it was w
> On Dec 13, 2023, at 6:22 AM, Brian Brindle wrote:
> My whole setup is a total kludge / hack that I never expected to use long
> term. I was just doing a POC and built the whole thing in about 10 minutes
> with stuff I had laying around but here we are almost five years later...
Brian, you ma
>From : run@rin.run
> >Date : 2023-12-13 - 02:11 (CEST)
> >To : m...@bitchin100.com
> >Subject : Re: [M100] 19.2Kbps on the Tandy 102
> >
> >Wow Brian!
> >
> >This setup with the Pi attached to the back looks amazing. It's attached
> >so
er, and it basically doubled the size
of pi zero. Something this small and that would plug right into the serial
port of the m100 would be great.
Jonathan
>Original Message
>From : run@rin.run
>Date : 2023-12-13 - 02:11 (CEST)
>To : m...@bitchin100.com
>Subject : Re: [M1
> Also T200 not working with hardware flow control? It used to. Steve
ported HTERM to it. I do recall we had issues with the > 19200bps baud
rates on the T200.
Well, know how part of the theme of this thread is things not happening the
way we remember them? I had this flagged as a flow control is
On 13/12/23 09:39, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
But what I recollect and what happened are not always the same thing.
Oh man, I hear you there, especially the more ... "seasoned" I get.
Cheers,
--dt
"But what I recollect and what happened are not always the same thing."
Ah yes... more and more, more and more every day...
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 6:09 PM John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 3:00 PM Mike Stein wrote:
>>
>> I've never had any problems at 19.2K using Windows
Thanks Runrin,
I was pretty happy with how the Pi Zero version turned out. I've had this
setup in some form or another for several years. The original version of
this was on a larger raspberry pi so I have used USB to serial adapters
without issues. Initially the Zero was run off of a USB to seria
Wow Brian!
This setup with the Pi attached to the back looks amazing. It's attached
so cleanly as well. I appreciate you doing the `stty' at the end,
hopefully mirroring your setup will help me get things working better on
my end.
I do wonder if the fact that you are using the Pi's GPIO pins to d
Thanks Mike, all good suggestions for sure but I was aiming to make the
worst possible situation to push the flow control as hard as I could.
John, before you questioned it I was certain, but now my memory may be
failing me but I seem to recall the T200 stealing the flow controlines to
run the lat
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 3:00 PM Mike Stein wrote:
> I've never had any problems at 19.2K using Windows so, as John
> suggests. there may be Linux-specific issues.
>
> There are buffers in most if not all USB-RS232 adapters and also in
> the program on the PC at the other end, and sometimes these
BTW, another tip: if you're sending a text file to the M100, send it
without Line Feeds (i.e. only CR) if possible; that will save time
since there's no scrolling, and that's how the M100 sends files
anyway.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:43 PM Brian Brindle wrote:
>
> This has come up in discussion a
I've never had any problems at 19.2K using Windows so, as John
suggests. there may be Linux-specific issues.
There are buffers in most if not all USB-RS232 adapters and also in
the program on the PC at the other end, and sometimes these need to be
tuned a bit. When I send a 25K file from TeraTerm
This has come up in discussion a few times so I wanted to show that
19.2Kbps on the Tandy 100 is possible with only software flow control.
Here is a video of me creating a 500 line 40 col file that is 20KB,
transferring it to the M102 and back again using the 19.2Kbps serial
connection. It gets sl
20 matches
Mail list logo
