Re: [M100] Model 600 BASIC ROM

2017-12-16 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
Awesome! On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 2:29 PM Brian White wrote: > Someone sent me a dump of the BASIC option rom for Model 600! > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=16M1QHbd4WuJuhUGcG06JTVW2YfO-WpWr > > -- > bkw >

[M100] Model 600 BASIC ROM

2017-12-16 Thread Brian White
Someone sent me a dump of the BASIC option rom for Model 600! https://drive.google.com/open?id=16M1QHbd4WuJuhUGcG06JTVW2YfO-WpWr -- bkw

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-10 Thread John Gardner
;> hardware without any service manual, apparently it is all 100% generic >>> parts. No asics, fpgas, cplds, gals or pals. So no mystery chips or >>> unobtanium chips. Should be possible in theory to debug it 100%. I don't >>> claim it would be worth the time it mig

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-09 Thread Christopher C
it 100%. I don't claim it would be >> worth the time it might take, only that it falls on the right side of >> possible vs not-possible. >> >> -- >> bkw >> >> On Feb 5, 2017 4:13 PM, "Willard Goosey" wrote: >> Just when I'd convinced myself th

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-09 Thread Brian White
rt of interested anyway, because it's the only 8088 box I've ever >> heard of that runs neither MSDOS or CP/M-86. OTOH it was such a failure! >> >> I don't actually have anything useful to say, besides "good luck". Now >> I'm going to go *stay o

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-08 Thread Christopher C
nly 8088 box I've ever > heard of that runs neither MSDOS or CP/M-86. OTOH it was such a failure! > > I don't actually have anything useful to say, besides "good luck". Now I'm > going to go *stay off ebay*. :-) > > Willard > Sent from Samsung table

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-06 Thread Willard Goosey
/2017 3:37 PM (GMT-07:00) To Model 100 Discussion Subject Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom Are you up to a little component level repair? I have 2 600's My first one was working except for the floppy drive, and some keyboard keys were corroded. I took it apart to replace the batteri

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-06 Thread Russell Flowers
"I have to say, even having a fully working unit, WITH basic installed, this thing is terrible. 9 1/2 lbs and almost useless, even compared to other machines of the day. Everything is incredibly slow for a machine with an 8088 in it. " That pretty much sums up my feelings toward it. Way too heavy,

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Brian White
Well well well! http://facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10210288781068862&id=1021174128 -- bkw On Feb 5, 2017 7:48 PM, "Brian White" wrote: There is no model 600 service manual in that ebay ad. Everything in that ad is available for free download from archive.org and several other copies on line,

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Brian White
ry to debug it 100%. I don't >> claim it would be worth the time it might take, only that it falls on the >> right side of possible vs not-possible. >> >> -- >> bkw >> >> On Feb 5, 2017 4:13 PM, "Willard Goosey" wrote: >> >>>

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Brian White
time it might take, only > > that it falls on the right side of possible vs not-possible. > > > > > > -- > > bkw > > > > > > On Feb 5, 2017 4:13 PM, "Willard Goosey" < goo...@sdc.org > wrote: >

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Gary Hammond
me all interested in the T600! ;-) > > > I was sort of interested anyway, because it's the only 8088 box I've > ever heard of that runs neither MSDOS or CP/M-86. OTOH it was such a > failure! > > > I don't actually have any

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Gary Hammond
nced myself that I don't need more old computers, > you have to go and get me all interested in the T600! ;-) > > > I was sort of interested anyway, because it's the only 8088 box I've > ever heard of that runs neither MSDOS or CP/M-86. OTOH it wa

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Rick
ard Goosey" < goo...@sdc.org > wrote: > > > > > Just when I'd convinced myself that I don't need more old computers, > you have to go and get me all interested in the T600! ;-) > > > I was sort of interested anyway, because it's the only 8088

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Josh Malone
#x27;d convinced myself that I don't need more old computers, you >> have to go and get me all interested in the T600! ;-) >> >> I was sort of interested anyway, because it's the only 8088 box I've ever >> heard of that runs neither MSDOS or CP/M-86. OTOH it was such a failure!

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Brian White
SDOS or CP/M-86. OTOH it was such a failure! > > I don't actually have anything useful to say, besides "good luck". Now > I'm going to go *stay off ebay*. :-) > > Willard > Sent from Samsung tablet > > > > Original message > F

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Willard Goosey
!  I don't actually have anything useful to say, besides "good luck".  Now I'm going to go *stay off ebay*. :-) Willard Sent from Samsung tablet Original message From Brian White Date: 02/05/2017 12:42 PM (GMT-07:00) To Model 100 Discussion Subject [M

[M100] Model 600 basic rom

2017-02-05 Thread Brian White
I started to try to tease apart whether the basic.!55 file is maybe a copy of the option rom, even though it's too large to fit on a chip. I was thinking, maybe someone copied the option rom to disk via the system manager, and the disk/ram copy just gets some kind of headers or tails added to it w

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-26 Thread Brian White
*From:* Brian White > *To:* Model 100 Discussion > *Sent:* Monday, January 23, 2017 6:12 AM > *Subject:* Re: [M100] Model 600 basic > > I think what happens is it ends up in my spam folder in gmail, but it only > happens sometimes. In this case I think it was because someone rep

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-23 Thread Chris Fezzler
:12 AM Subject: Re: [M100] Model 600 basic I think what happens is it ends up in my spam folder in gmail, but it only happens sometimes. In this case I think it was because someone replied to the post, and that *reply* was shunted to spam because of something to do with the senders yahoo

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-23 Thread Brian White
I think what happens is it ends up in my spam folder in gmail, but it only happens sometimes. In this case I think it was because someone replied to the post, and that *reply* was shunted to spam because of something to do with the senders yahoo address, but the entire thread was displayed together

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-22 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
There's no moderation except for unsubscribed users and special cases. You're not a special case :-) -- John.

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic & file transfer

2017-01-22 Thread Brian White
" wrote: > Great job Brian. The 600 is a CP/M, right? > > -- > *From:* Brian White > *To:* Model 100 Discussion > *Sent:* Saturday, January 21, 2017 12:45 AM > *Subject:* [M100] Model 600 basic & file transfer > > Hot damn it works!

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-22 Thread Chris Fezzler
Great work.  Your interest in the 600 is adding some new and interesting content to the listserv! From: Brian White To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 10:08 AM Subject: Re: [M100] Model 600 basic Do posts that start a new subject go into some kind of

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic & file transfer

2017-01-22 Thread Chris Fezzler
Great job Brian.  The 600 is a CP/M, right? From: Brian White To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 12:45 AM Subject: [M100] Model 600 basic & file transfer Hot damn it works!Thanks to Steve digging up that basic.!55 file, and the xmodem in the built-in te

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-22 Thread Brian White
Do posts that start a new subject go into some kind of moderator holding tank or something? I posted some directions how to use the built-in xmodem and get basic.!55 installed but it never showed up. Anyway a copy is in a google doc here. I'm working on cleaning up and fleshing out the doc over ti

[M100] Model 600 basic & file transfer

2017-01-20 Thread Brian White
Hot damn it works! Thanks to Steve digging up that basic.!55 file, and the xmodem in the built-in telcom app, it's possible for someone with a bare Model 600 with no utility disk or basic option rom, to download and install all the utility disk files, format a new blank disk, copy the files to it,

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-20 Thread Brian White
It doesn't do anything if you don't have a BASIC interpreter on the machine to run it. The Model 600 did not ship with BASIC in rom. But I just managed to get past that hurdle. See next post... On Jan 20, 2017 10:28 PM, "Bill Nobel" wrote: > It does make a .co file. Not sure if that helps, but

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-20 Thread Bill Nobel
It does make a .co file. Not sure if that helps, but if it is compatible with the 600 I could send it to you as a .co Sent from my iPad On Jan 20, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Brian White mailto:bw.al...@gmail.com>> wrote: "...big deal to discover that it's in the built-in telcom" xmodem that is, not b

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-20 Thread Brian White
"...big deal to discover that it's in the built-in telcom" xmodem that is, not basic

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-20 Thread Brian White
But you can't run any basic program on a Model 600, because it doesn't come with basic. That's why it's such a big deal to discover that it's in the built-in telcom. With that, it's then possible to download basic as an executable, and THEN you can run basic programs. There was a basic option rom,

Re: [M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-20 Thread Bill Nobel
I have it on the 102. It's called xmodem.bas which creates a new telecom with xmodem. It works great for transfers from other devices. Can't remember where I got it from, but I'm sure it came from bitchin100 library. -Bill Sent from my iPad > On Jan 20, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Brian White wrote:

[M100] Model 600 basic

2017-01-20 Thread Brian White
TELCOM DOES HAVE Xmodem! Testing it out now. This changes everything. I was actually in the process of trying to see if I could get away with setting hardware flow control and 8 bit characters and see if I could just send the raw binary over the session and collect it into session log, and name t