On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 11:34 AM, Puneet Kishor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tip. However, it seems twiki requires updating the
stock Apple perl 5.6.0 to 5.8.0 (I read the notes at the OSX
specific page).
Fortunately, that statement in the topic TWikiOnMacOSX is wrong;
To all those who replied, many thanks. To summarize...
I wanted an easy to install and use content management system that I
could use for creating multiple art websites. The system _had_ to be
able to run with Apple's stock perl 5.6.0, and if it used a database,
the db had to be simple to
Le Mercredi, 16 octo 2002, à 08:52 America/Montreal, Paul Hoffman a
écrit :
It sounds like the note's author ran into the try to install 5.8
CPAN problem we all know and love.
What is this problem? I recently installed 5.8.0 without any problem
but I know there's something about threading
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 07:52 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 11:34 AM, Puneet Kishor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tip. However, it seems twiki requires updating the
stock Apple perl 5.6.0 to 5.8.0 (I read the notes at the OSX specific
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 09:51 AM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
I found a wonderful list at http://www.la-grange.net/cms which I used
to further my search.
I found callisto to be simply amazing, but was a bit overwhelmed by
AxKit.
Like the little greens guys in Toy Story would
My apologies...
Yes, Pete, you did mention MT, and its licensing cost. It was my
oversight to not restate that.
Cost _is_ a problem, and I have to talk with the Trotts about it. If
the Gallery/artists I am doing this for start making any money there
will be no problem in paying up. That
David Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 06:51 AM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
I looked very longingly at bricolage, but I found a few things wrong
with it... (1) it requires a lot of complicated pieces to be in place
in order to work; (2) not supporting MySQL is problematic for
I noticed some discussion on this about a month ago. Since the archives
for this list are not accessible at the moment (I can get a limited
amount of information from Google), I can't find out if this ever got
solved. Sorry in advance if this has already been covered (just joined
this list
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
yes, I know. That's why I wrote the above... hoping I would get a
response from you. ;-). Thanks for the response.
And I fell for it! Damn!
I am wondering if you folks have considered making some of the
complicated pieces
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 06:51 AM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
I looked very longingly at bricolage, but I found a few things wrong
with it... (1) it requires a lot of complicated pieces to be in place
in order to work; (2) not supporting MySQL is problematic for me; (3)
there was no
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 11:22 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Short of Something's busted, go get it fixed, can anyone think of
anything I can do to this beast that might get OS X installed on it?
I recall hearing reports of OS X being much more picky about RAM timing
than older
RAM is a possibility. However, my apparently good Ti 400 mhz laptop
passed all tests including backing out the new RAM and new HD to the
original out of box state did nothing. I could install 10 but not 10.1
nor 10.1.2 nor even 10.1.3. After an out of warrantee motherboard
replacement,
12 matches
Mail list logo
