On 10/11/16 2:17 AM, Russell Jones wrote:
> Interesting. Aren't the main requirement for quartz and wayland support the
> same, i.e. port to GTK+ 3 and don't use X11
> calls? Or is it more subtle than that?
Well, that's the general idea and anyone writing a new GTK3/GNOME
Interesting. Aren't the main requirement for quartz and wayland support
the same, i.e. port to GTK+ 3 and don't use X11 calls? Or is it more
subtle than that?
Russell
On 11/10/16 02:42, David Evans wrote:
Overall quartz is taking a back seat to some other alternative backends,
pa
On 10/10/16 2:18 PM, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>>
>>
>> These are all legitimate and in my experience tend to come from trying to
>> switch from building +x11 to building +quartz
>> without "cleaning the slate" as it were. I always do this when switching
>
>
>
> These are all legitimate and in my experience tend to come from trying to
> switch from building +x11 to building +quartz
> without "cleaning the slate" as it were. I always do this when switching
> like this (say with gimp2 that can build
> either way
On 10/10/16 9:41 AM, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> Is there a wiki page I missed perhaps for how to sort out the conflicting
> requirements for +x11 and +quartz in the various gtk port implementations?
>
> I understand the basic reasons for this, but I quite frequently seem to find
>
Is there a wiki page I missed perhaps for how to sort out the conflicting
requirements for +x11 and +quartz in the various gtk port implementations?
I understand the basic reasons for this, but I quite frequently seem to find
myself on the wrong side of the line with this.
Perhaps there is no
Hi,
Drawing some attention to some recent enhancements I've submitted to MacPorts'
port:dbus (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52257#comment:3) in hope of
rallying some beta-testers.
I think many users who regularly work on a remote Mac using X11 for displaying
probably no
Thanks, Dave
It seems as though Epiphany is a reasonable option to investigate for a
snowleopard browser going forward (unless there is a better browser option I
don't know about). So it appears worth the effort to try to get it functional
on snowleopard.
If Epiphany can build withou
on snow leopard. But there are name space conflicts between X11 and QD, so as
> the webkit2-gtk code base stands now, the only way to build it is to disable
> X11 and build for quartz only.
>
> Unfortunately, Epiphany pulls in gnome-desktop, which pulls in gtk3 +X11, and
> gnome-des
I'm attempting to build Epiphany on SnowLeopard with libc++ installed, as Snow
Leopard has no up-to-date browser options available any longer.
Epiphany uses webkit2-gtk, and with some minor fixes, webkit2-gtk does build on
snow leopard. But there are name space conflicts between X11 and Q
> On Jun 13, 2016, at 14:50, Ulf-Dietrich Braumann
> wrote:
>
> Hello, could you please advice me how to replace XQuartz's X11 bei MacPorts'
> X11 under Leopard. I have successfully built xorg, X11.app works if I
> explcitely open it from the /Applications/Macpo
soft pulseaudio json-c rtmpdump
>> soundtouch spandsp-devel x265 gstreamer1-gst-plugins-good libdv libshout2
>> taglib hyphen libnotify libsecret libgcrypt libgpg-error yelp-xsl
>> ---> Fetching archive for gtksourceview2
>> Error: org.macports.archivefetch for port gtkso
> On May 23, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Peter Brommer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> somehow the quartz vs x11 has flared up on the list again, and I now have my
> own problem to add. I’m running mostly quartz packages (mainly inkscape,
> gimp…). This means I have gtk2 +quartz as th
Hi,
somehow the quartz vs x11 has flared up on the list again, and I now have my
own problem to add. I’m running mostly quartz packages (mainly inkscape,
gimp…). This means I have gtk2 +quartz as the active installation:
$ port installed gtk2
The following ports are currently installed:
gtk2
On Jan 3, 2016, at 1:26 AM, John T. Chung wrote:
>
> port install xorg-server returned an error, see below:
>
> ---> Attempting to fetch xorg-server-1.17.4.tar.bz2 from
> http://jog.id.distfiles.macports.org/macports/mpdistfiles/xorg-server
> ---> Attempting to fetch xorg-server-1.17.4.tar.bz
gt; >
> > On Jan 2, 2016, at 11:19 AM, John T. Chung wrote:
> >
> >> Everything installed w/.o problems:
> >>
> >> ---> Attempting to fetch pidgin-2.10.11_4+x11.darwin_9.ppc.tbz2 from
> http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/pidgin
> >> --->
On 1/2/16 12:42 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Jan 2, 2016, at 11:19 AM, John T. Chung wrote:
>
>> Everything installed w/.o problems:
>>
>> ---> Attempting to fetch pidgin-2.10.11_4+x11.darwin_9.ppc.tbz2 from
>> http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/pidgin
&g
On Jan 2, 2016, at 11:19 AM, John T. Chung wrote:
> Everything installed w/.o problems:
>
> ---> Attempting to fetch pidgin-2.10.11_4+x11.darwin_9.ppc.tbz2 from
> http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/pidgin
> ---> Fetching distfiles for pidgin
> ---> Ver
Everything installed w/.o problems:
---> Attempting to fetch pidgin-2.10.11_4+x11.darwin_9.ppc.tbz2 from
http://lil.fr.packages.macports.org/pidgin
---> Fetching distfiles for pidgin
---> Verifying checksums for pidgin
---> Extracting pidgin
---> Applying patches to pidgin
--
t; There would be nothing to switch because both would be installed. Just use
>>> the full path to whatever program you want to run.
>>>
>>>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:24, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Funny - I actually never noticed an
2015, at 11:24, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>>>
>>> Funny - I actually never noticed any difference between quartz and x11 :-)
>>>
>>> Assuming there is some noticeable difference and I decide to keep both, how
>>> do I switch from one macports installation to
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Seabra
wrote:
> How about when I need to install a new port? wouldn’t I need to select one
> installation over another?
Just use the full path to the appropriate "port" command.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine assoc
ath to whatever program you want to run.
>
>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:24, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>>
>> Funny - I actually never noticed any difference between quartz and x11 :-)
>>
>> Assuming there is some noticeable difference and I decide to keep both, how
>> d
There would be nothing to switch because both would be installed. Just use the
full path to whatever program you want to run.
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:24, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>
> Funny - I actually never noticed any difference between quartz and x11 :-)
>
> Assuming there is
Funny - I actually never noticed any difference between quartz and x11 :-)
Assuming there is some noticeable difference and I decide to keep both, how do
I switch from one macports installation to the other and back when using it?
Thanks,
Gustavo Seabra
> Em 3 de dez de 2015, à(s) 14
We default to X11 because there are still many software packages written by
developers who do not test on a Mac, are not aware of Quartz, and inadvertently
write software that requires X11.
Some users prefer to use Quartz because its visual appearance is more pleasing
to them than X11. If you
OK, it looks as id it will take a bit more work than normal to get it working…
BTW, do you know of any port that does not have a +x11 variant, and would
require exclusively the +quartz one? (I’m trying to decide if there’s any
reason to keep the quartz around at all).
Thanks,
Gustavo Seabra
all a
> port that depends on x11 (PyMol). If I try this, the install crashes with the
> message:
Let's use the correct terminology: nothing has crashed; you've merely
encountered an error message.
> ---> Rebuilding in order
> gtksourceview2 @2.10.5
> py27-
nhywfar4-gtk @4.14.0_2
--->geoclue @0.12.99_5
--->webkit-gtk @2.4.9_0+video
--->meld @1.8.6_0
--->goffice08 @0.8.17_1
--->gnome-themes-standard @3.18.0_0+quartz
--->libcanberra @0.30_5+x11
--->libglade2 @2.6.4_8
--->py27-pygtk @2.24.0_3+quartz
--
Dec 3, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Gustavo Seabra
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have recently changed to Quartz, a process started with the command
> suggested here:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.macports.user/39617
>
> After some kinks, it all works fine now. However, I now w
eabra
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have recently changed to Quartz, a process started with the command
> suggested here:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.macports.user/39617
>
> After some kinks, it all works fine now. However, I now want to install a
> port that depends
Hi all,
I have recently changed to Quartz, a process started with the command suggested
here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.macports.user/39617
After some kinks, it all works fine now. However, I now want to install a port
that depends on x11 (PyMol). If I try this, the install
Hi
OT because this is not a macports issue but OnT because it affects many ports
I often cannot start X11. Nothing particular (that I can understand) in the
logs. log out then back in usually fixes the issue
system.log:Nov 22 11:14:56 haycorn.home
org.macosforge.xquartz.privileged_startx[
port other transports and
> autolaunching mechanisms; my understanding is that the IPC offered by
> the Darwin kernel is broadly similar to FreeBSD, so everything that
> works on FreeBSD ought to work on Darwin.
> <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18013> also mentions X11
> auto
Hi,
I've just started to realise that with the current OS X implementation of DBus,
it's just about impossible to run applications from a Mac on a remote X11
display when they need DBus features. For local displaying everything is fine
because launchd will allow the dbus daemon to b
On Monday April 06 2015 05:03:50 Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Ian Wadham wrote:
>
> > >>> Schröder's cat
> > >> [If it is not a savvy abbreviation…]
> [...]
> > I hope New, Fara, Max, Ein, Bo and Heisberg will not come round to haunt
> > you…
>
> Not to mention Charles Schulz...
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Ian Wadham wrote:
> >>> Schröder's cat
> >> [If it is not a savvy abbreviation…]
[...]
> I hope New, Fara, Max, Ein, Bo and Heisberg will not come round to haunt
> you…
Not to mention Charles Schulz...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security w
On 03/04/2015, at 4:47 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday April 02 2015 19:31:19 Eneko Gotzon wrote:
>
>>> Schröder's cat
>> [If it is not a savvy abbreviation…]
>
> Nope ... more like an involuntary shortcut my fingers made ...
>
>> Just FYI: (Erwin) Schrödinger
>
> Oops. I knew that.
On Thursday April 02 2015 19:31:19 Eneko Gotzon wrote:
>> Schröder's cat
>[If it is not a savvy abbreviation…]
Nope ... more like an involuntary shortcut my fingers made ...
>Just FYI: (Erwin) Schrödinger
Oops. I knew that. Apologies to anyone offended!
(Or: actually: the Herr Ing was temp
On Thursday April 02 2015 20:29:38 Dave Horsfall wrote:
>Not quite; it's Click To Focus, which means the window receiving the
>keyboard is the one in front, making it impossible to type into a
>background window at the same time.
Note that windows rarely behave like Schröder's cat despite being
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Eneko Gotzon wrote:
> I can't stand CTF
>
> Please, what's that?
>
> Canadian Taxpayer's Federation? ;)
Not quite; it's Click To Focus, which means the window receiving the
keyboard is the one in front, making it impossible to type into a
background window at the s
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> I can't stand CTF
Please, what's that?
Canadian Taxpayer's Federation? ;)
--
Eneko Gotzon Ares
enekogot...@gmail.com
—
*LEGEZKO ABISU: Posta elektroniko honek eta, hala badagokio,
fitxategi erantsiek, informazio konfidentziala dute bar
On Wednesday April 01 2015 11:49:35 Chris Jones wrote:
>> Your kidding there right ;) As far as I am concerned KDE went down the
>> toilet when it switched from KDE3 to the bloated mess KDE4 is !
>
>Just to clarify, I was talking about KDE as a desktop environment. The
>applications themselves ar
OT: Recent developments have been chipping away at/from that "best
unix for the desktop" aspect, while KDE has given Linux a desktop
that's getting close to being as good (but KF5 seems to be making the
same kind of choices I dislike in recent OS X versions, so I'll
probably will hang on to OS X
OT: Recent developments have been chipping away at/from that "best unix for the
desktop" aspect, while KDE has given Linux a desktop that's getting close to being
as good (but KF5 seems to be making the same kind of choices I dislike in recent OS X
versions, so I'll probably will hang on to O
On Wednesday April 01 2015 10:20:00 Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Ah; another FFM fan :-) I can't stand CTF, but I can understand why the
Yep. Though I must admit that occasionally I am surprised FFG doesn't work
(focus follows gaze, as in oh yeah, my mouse was still in that other window) :)
> I lik
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> I know iTerm2, but its power features aren't appealing/useful enough to
> me to make up for the fact that it doesn't do "focus follows mouse" as
> well as Apple's Terminal.app .
Ah; another FFM fan :-) I can't stand CTF, but I can understand why th
On Tuesday March 31 2015 14:45:48 Ned Deily wrote:
I know iTerm2, but its power features aren't appealing/useful enough to me to
make up for the fact that it doesn't do "focus follows mouse" as well as
Apple's Terminal.app .
> useful power features and doesn't use X. Of course, if one *prefers
In article <1979918.mOAS13Diux@portia.local>,
Rene J.V. Bertin wrote:
> One reason I use xterms for so much of my command line tinkering is how
> double clicking selection works (full paths, for instance) and copies the
> selected content at once to a clipboard or cutbuffer (CLIPBOARD?).
Just
This is something I've always wondered to know but was a wee bit afraid to ask:
how do the different X11 clip and paste boards interact with the other
cutbuffers (etc)?
One reason I use xterms for so much of my command line tinkering is how double
clicking selection works (full paths
On Friday February 06 2015 09:24:56 Michael wrote:
> Mono's library dependencies:
> Library Dependencies: gettext, glib2, libiconv, zlib, libgdiplus, xorg-libX11
If mono depends on X11 directly and not through GTk2, then it won't be as easy
to avoid the dependency as I thought
es.
>
> However, Mono uses GTk2, no? And port:gtk2 can be built with +quartz which
> doesn't depend on X11 at all from what I can see.
Mono's library dependencies:
Library Dependencies: gettext, glib2, libiconv, zlib, libgdiplus, xorg-libX11
And, Gtk2 also has:
Library Depen
se without being able to use GUI
thingies.
However, Mono uses GTk2, no? And port:gtk2 can be built with +quartz which
doesn't depend on X11 at all from what I can see.
However, gtk2+quartz and gtk2+x11 are currently incompatible, but that's
probably not an issue for someone who app
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Michael wrote:
> I'm trying to install a program that needs mono, because it's written for
> C#.
> So, I try to install mono from macports.
> ... and it wants to pull in all of X11? Does C# really require X11?
>
The standard library in
I'm trying to install a program that needs mono, because it's written for C#.
So, I try to install mono from macports.
... and it wants to pull in all of X11? Does C# really require X11?
---
Entertaining minecraft videos
http://YouTube.com
On Jan 17, 2015, at 4:41 AM, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
> I wonder if there is a good way to switch from Gimp +x11 to +quartz? Just
> sudo port install gimp -x11 +quartz, *did* install that but all dependencies
> were still the same, so there was no difference :)
`port install` doesn
Hi,
I wonder if there is a good way to switch from Gimp +x11 to +quartz? Just sudo
port install gimp -x11 +quartz, *did* install that but all dependencies were
still the same, so there was no difference :)
Take care
Dom
___
macports-users mailing
Hi,
I wonder if there is a good way to switch from Gimp +x11 to +quartz? Just sudo
port install gimp -x11 +quartz, *did* install that but all dependencies were
still the same, so there was no difference :)
Take care
Dom
___
macports-users mailing
Howdy,
Does anyone have X11 forwarding working w/ 10.10.1? After much
kajiggering, still: (from Mac 10.10.1 => to Ubuntu 14.04.1)
mac $ ssh -vY remote
debug1: No xauth program.
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
debug1: Requesting X11 forwarding w
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Chongkai Jiang wrote:
> I cannot get X11 forwarding to work on Yosemite. I installed xQuartz
> 2.7.7 that used to work well under Mavericks.
I couldn't get it to work with Mavericks, but that could've been because I
hadn't configured it in my SSH confi
Hi there,
I cannot get X11 forwarding to work on Yosemite. I installed xQuartz 2.7.7
that used to work well under Mavericks.
>From the following log, I guess "xauth generate" failed locally on my Mac,
right?
Thanks for any help.
>> echo $DISPLAY
/private/tmp/com.apple
Hi All,
The most recent version of ImageMagick (6.8.9-6_0+x11) fails to process
WordPress image uploads properly. I have not tested with any other systems.
Setup: Mac 10.9.4, Apache 2.2.27, PHP 5.5.15 MySQL 5.5.38 PHP Shortcode
(Also occurs on a system with Mac 10.7.5, Apache 2.2.27, PHP
er a long, long time, the installation stops with the message
>>>> below. Isn’t it possible to install gnucash with xquartz anymore?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gustavo.
>>>>
>>>> ---> Fetching archive for gnome-settings-daemon
ll gnucash with xquartz anymore?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gustavo.
>>>
>>> ---> Fetching archive for gnome-settings-daemon
>>> Error: org.macports.archivefetch for port gnome-settings-daemon returned:
>>> libcanberra must be installed w
On Jun 05, 2014, at 13:19, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>> Gnucash yes, oxygen-gtk, no. I'm throwing together a portfile for that, but
>> it was a straight install. Just point the install prefix to /opt/local, and
>> invoke MacPort's cmake command.
>
> So, you mean downloading the source files (maybe
Em 05/06/2014, à(s) 07:32, René J.V. Bertin escreveu:
>
> On Jun 05, 2014, at 12:19, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
>
>> Thanks! Can you elaborate on that a bit? Did you build it out of Macports?
>
> Build what, gnucash or oxygen-gtk?
Sorry, I meant gnucash.
> Gnucash yes, oxygen-gtk, no. I'm throwin
On Jun 05, 2014, at 12:19, Gustavo Seabra wrote:
> Thanks! Can you elaborate on that a bit? Did you build it out of Macports?
Build what, gnucash or oxygen-gtk? Gnucash yes, oxygen-gtk, no. I'm throwing
together a portfile for that, but it was a straight install. Just point the
install prefix
Em 05/06/2014, à(s) 05:09, René J.V. Bertin escreveu:
>
> How complete is the OS X version of GTk anyway, nowadays? I've tried gnucash
> under X11 with the oxygen-gtk2 theme installed, and it worked just fine...
>
> R.
Thanks! Can you elaborate on that a bit? Did you buil
ppropriately in the
> dependencies (either that or some of the dependencies were already installed
> without the proper variants). If I had to guess, I would say it's probably a
> subtle error with some of the MacPorts dependency trees.
>
> You can try rebuilding libcanber
> ---> Fetching archive for gnome-settings-daemon
>> Error: org.macports.archivefetch for port gnome-settings-daemon returned:
>> libcanberra must be installed with +x11.
>> Error: Failed to install gnome-settings-da
On Wednesday June 04 2014 22:51:49 Jason Swails wrote:
> You can try rebuilding libcanberra with the +x11 variant and then try
> gnucash again. This is the approach I've used in the past when I've gotten
> similar errors.
That could work, but only if gnucash's use of l
eady
installed without the proper variants). If I had to guess, I would say
it's probably a subtle error with some of the MacPorts dependency trees.
You can try rebuilding libcanberra with the +x11 variant and then try
gnucash again. This is the approach I've used in the past when I'
returned:
> libcanberra must be installed with +x11.
> Error: Failed to install gnome-settings-daemon
> Please see the log file for port gnome-settings-daemon for details:
>
> /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_gno
possible to install gnucash with xquartz anymore?
Thanks,
Gustavo.
---> Fetching archive for gnome-settings-daemon
Error: org.macports.archivefetch for port gnome-settings-daemon returned:
libcanberra must be installed with +x11.
Error: Failed to install gnome-settings-daemon
Please see the
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Ludwig wrote:
> What happens if you launch these apps from an xterm within MacPorts’ X11?
>
This won't help; it's the client libraries that are stubbed in this case,
and xterm does not control those.
--
brandon
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Kevin Reid wrote:
> The dialog does not come from the application but from the system-provided
> X11.app (this is observable by Dock/menu bar) which is a nonfunctional stub
> (this is what my research says).
>
> It sounds like the assumption is that when yo
Instructions from the maintainer of MacPorts' xorg-server (from the -dev list):
On Mar 26, 2014, at 14:28, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
wrote:
> The stubs are there for projects that linked against /usr/X11. All you
> really need to do is setup symlinks to redirect them to your MP
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Kevin Reid wrote:
> It sounds like the assumption is that when you install third-party X11 as
> instructed by the dialog, it will _replace_ the system-provided X11. But
> MacPorts doesn't replace system files as a rule -- I'm looking for a
&g
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Kevin Reid wrote:
> When I run X11 applications built by MacPorts, they open in the X11 server
> “app” built by MacPorts (/Applications/MacPorts/X11.app). When I run
> separately distributed Mac-packaged X11 applications (MCEdit, Closure (the
> game
On Mar 26, 2014, at 10:07, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> This might really depend on the application: is it checking for x11 or giving
> up based on the OS?
The dialog does not come from the application but from the system-provided
X11.app (this is observable by Dock/menu bar) whic
This might really depend on the application: is it checking for x11 or giving
up based on the OS?
On March 26, 2014 12:44:52 PM EDT, Kevin Reid wrote:
>When I run X11 applications built by MacPorts, they open in the X11
>server “app” built by MacPorts (/Applications/MacPorts/X11.app).
When I run X11 applications built by MacPorts, they open in the X11 server
“app” built by MacPorts (/Applications/MacPorts/X11.app). When I run separately
distributed Mac-packaged X11 applications (MCEdit, Closure (the game)), it
opens the “X11 is no longer included with OS X” dialog.
How do I
On Dec 29, 2013, at 22:26, Hiroyasu Yasuda wrote:
> Dear Open-maintainer of Plplot,
I don’t believe the maintainer of plplot is subscribed to this mailing list.
You may have to email him directly.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists
Dear Open-maintainer of Plplot,
I'v tried to install Plplot 5.9.9 into flesh Mac on OSX 10.9 with latest
Macports 2.2.1. XQuartz has been installed to the Mac manually before
stating Macports according to instruction of Macports installation. Actually
installation process of the Plplot has been su
to 10.9
>> and Xcode 5.0.1, the X11 app appears in /Applications/Utilities ...
>> alongside with the XQuartz app. I seem to recall I intentionally installed
>> XQuartz last year because Apple had no longer provided the X11 app. But
>> maybe I'm just losing it with my me
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Tabitha McNerney wrote:
> Maybe its my imagination, but I noticed today, after the upgrade to 10.9
> and Xcode 5.0.1, the X11 app appears in /Applications/Utilities ...
> alongside with the XQuartz app. I seem to recall I intentionally installed
>
On Nov 4, 2013, at 18:23, Dominik Reichardt wrote:
> double click it :)
>
> (it will lead eventually to xquartz)
Right, on a vanilla OS X 10.8 or later system, /Applications/Utilities/X11.app
is a placeholder, inviting you to download and install XQuartz. Or if you’d
prefer t
so of course make
> sure I have downloaded the additional components required such as the command
> line tools.
>
> Maybe its my imagination, but I noticed today, after the upgrade to 10.9 and
> Xcode 5.0.1, the X11 app appears in /Applications/Utilities ... alongside
> w
today, after the upgrade to 10.9
and Xcode 5.0.1, the X11 app appears in /Applications/Utilities ...
alongside with the XQuartz app. I seem to recall I intentionally installed
XQuartz last year because Apple had no longer provided the X11 app. But
maybe I'm just losing it with my memory. Or
`port -v installed` will show the variant selection for installed ports.
You’ll probably want to use `port upgrade —enforce-variants …` to switch ports
the variants you want.
On Oct 28, 2013, at 16:18, Comer Duncan wrote:
> How do I find the list of currently installed ports which use
How do I find the list of currently installed ports which use x11 rather
than quartz? I have a bunch of ports which still specify +x11 and I want
to remove them, reinstall with +quartz as a uniform option.
Thanks.
Comer
*Comer Duncan* *, Bowling Green State University 1970-2005
On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:13, David Favor wrote:
> As these are mutually exclusive
Not in all ports. Some ports, libraries in particular, can often be installed
with support for both X11 and Quartz graphics.
> someone clarify the differences.
>
> 1) It appears specifying a +quartz
Mac OS X graphics, not any X11 implementation.
> 2) How does http://xquartz.macosforge.org/ relate to the quartz-wm port?
> Specifically,
>"port install quartz-wm" + quartz-wm --version produces version 1.3.1
> while the
>XQuartz site shows version 2.7.4 + the
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Peter Danecek wrote:
> Just, one doubt: From Mac OS X 10.5 I was used to the fact that starting any
> program using X11 would start up the X11.app automatically. How would I need
> to set this up with the MacPorts' version? Is the XQuartz package set
On 3 Jun 2013, at 21:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:57, Peter Danecek wrote:
it's again about a fresh install of a OS X 10.8 system. I realise,
there is no X11 package available from Apple anymore for this OS
version. Still there two options to install X11.
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:57, Peter Danecek wrote:
> it's again about a fresh install of a OS X 10.8 system. I realise, there is
> no X11 package available from Apple anymore for this OS version. Still there
> two options to install X11.
>
> (1) org-server via MacP
Hi all,
it's again about a fresh install of a OS X 10.8 system. I realise, there is no
X11 package available from Apple anymore for this OS version. Still there two
options to install X11.
(1) org-server via MacPorts
(2) the package form the XQuartz Project
So what ar
r?
>>
>> It would become enabled by default for all users.
>
> So, it would theoretically be possible for User A to log out and back in and
> find that their X11 has changed (perhaps they were using XQuartz) because
> User B had in the meantime installed xorg-server (whic
heoretically be possible for User A to log out and back in and
find that their X11 has changed (perhaps they were using XQuartz) because User
B had in the meantime installed xorg-server (which I know is the same, it's a
thought experiment)? Or am I missing something? That doesn't seem l
t;>> Is it really just the patchfile
>>>> https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/x11/xinit/files/disable-launchagent.patch
>>>> that disables on-demand loading of X11.app by default?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> This approach was t
1 - 100 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
