Interesting. I find portrait mode works better I considered the 3g
version, but thought I didn't need both that and an iPhone.
Olivia
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Bryan Smart
wrote:
I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet,
but I had some time
I think the idea is awesome in terms of accessibility and apple will
certainly get praises for that which they deserve, however I think the
product itself is a rip off. sure, it's $499, but then they plan to rape you
at the app counter, so yeah it's accessible alright, but is it worth a place
i
ia Norman"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Interesting. I find portrait mode works better I considered the 3g
version, but thought I didn't need both that and an iPhone.
Olivia
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Bryan Smart
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me that
Apple has really made a place for themselves in the lower priced devices with
the introduction of the iPad. I personally think the price is impressive.
Robert Carter
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Cody wrote:
> I
bject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me
that Apple has really made a place for themselves in the lower priced
devices with the introduction of the iPad. I personally think the price is
impressive.
Robert Carter
On Apr 6, 2
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Cody
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:24 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
I think the idea is awesome in terms of accessibility and apple will
certainly get praises for that which they deserve, however I think the
uot;
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
Why you say ATT is going to rip you at the counter. As I understand it you
can get it with or without a data plan and the data plan does not as of
now
have to be a contract. I understand it will be able to have two p
And do you have evidence that Apple will "rape" you at the App Counter? I
think offering the iWork suite for the iPad at $10 per app is a very fair
price. I am not sure what developers will charge for their apps exactly, but I
gather the prices will not be substantially different than what is c
It does seem like a fine deal.
But, what can you now do with an ipad that you could not do with any other
apple tool you already own? That is for those who own many.
Not being provocative, just wondering.
When I consider investing in a new technical tool it is because there is
something I wis
Karen,
Can you contact me off list...I believe you were the one who knows that
audio person who works with the blind here in portland.
Sorry to get off topic
- Original Message -
From: "Karen Lewellen"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad
I just love my iPad, but I'm a total sucker for the latest apple products! :)
Now that they've made everything accessible I think that there will be those of
us who want the latest apple stuff, just like our sighted peers who are also
apple fanatics. :)
Does anyone really "need" an iPad? perhaps
arter"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me
that Apple has really made a place for themselves in the lower priced
devices with the introduction of the iPad. I personally thi
I'll have a
> lower price, and I am not limited to the Software big brother Apple wants me
> to have.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Carter"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
>
>
&
Yes, makes a lot of sense to me. iWork is indeed a great deal on the iPad.
Olivia
On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
> And do you have evidence that Apple will "rape" you at the App Counter? I
> think offering the iWork suite for the iPad at $10 per app is a very fair
> price. I a
with far greater
>> storage capacity for far less, and even if I buy System Access, I'll have a
>> lower price, and I am not limited to the Software big brother Apple wants me
>> to have.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Robert Carter"
n portland.
Sorry to get off topic
- Original Message - From: "Karen Lewellen"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
It does seem like a fine deal.
But, what can you now do with an ipad that you could not do with any other
apple tool you a
eater=
=20
> storage capacity for far less, and even if I buy System Access, I'll have=
a=20
> lower price, and I am not limited to the Software big brother Apple wants=
me=20
> to have.
>=20
> ----- Original Message -=20
> From: "Robert Carter"
> To:
>
y for far less, and even if I buy System Access, I'll have a
>> lower price, and I am not limited to the Software big brother Apple wants me
>> to have.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Robert Carter"
>> To:
>> Sent: Tuesda
o the iPhone.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Cody
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:25 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Also consider how often wifi will be avai
ies@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
I think the idea is awesome in terms of accessibility and apple will certainly
get praises for that which they deserve, however I think the product itself is
a rip off. sure, it's $499, but then they plan to rape you at the app counter,
Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. This is what everyone
should do.
> From: bryansm...@bryansmart.com
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:47:00 -0400
> Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
>
> Yep, and your iPhone will have a m
t: RE: Used an iPad today
Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. This is what everyone
should do.
> From: bryansm...@bryansmart.com
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:47:00 -0400
> Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
>
&g
to the same as if you were to buy an iMac
> - Original Message -
> From: Blake Sinnett
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:13 PM
> Subject: RE: Used an iPad today
>
> Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. Thi
I think that what Cody is referring too is the price of the apps and games for
the IPad.. They arre outrageous compared to the IPhone and IPod apps and could
easily shrink the pocketbook making the prospect of having an IPad with all of
the apps you want quite expensive.
On Apr 6, 2010, at 12
That is exactly what I'm saying.
- Original Message -
From: "carlene knight"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
I think that what Cody is referring too is the price of the apps and games
for the IPad.. They arre outrageous
ic
Blake Sinnett wrote:
> Seems like the smart people are making universal apps. This is what everyone
> should do.
>
> > From: bryansm...@bryansmart.com
> > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:47:00 -0400
> > Subject: RE: Used an iPa
I was amazed
to find them completed and ready to use. I never got into web browsing with
the iPhone.
- Original Message -
From: "Vic"
To: "MacVisionaries"
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Hi,
We have an iPad "in the ho
As they say, what the market will support is the price you can charge.
It's only outrageous if they price it such that nobody buys the stuff.
As early adopters the appStore devs are probably trying to milk things a
bit, but that can't last as cheaper competitors will come online.
CB
carlene k
t: Thursday, 8 April 2010 6:24 a.m.
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Well stated, as always, John!
Olivia
On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:44 AM, John Panarese wrote:
> Actually, as has been said several times, it is not over priced. For
those who beli
be ported
back to the iPhone.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Cody
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 3:25 PM
To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
Also consider how often wi
on.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of olivia norman
> Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 6:24 a.m.
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
>
> Well stated, as
text books.
>>
>> That's what I'd be buying one for, not for making phone calls on.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of olivia norman
>> Sent: Thursd
em
>> to their students instead of printed text books.
>>
>> That's what I'd be buying one for, not for making phone calls on.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On
ge-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of olivia norman
>> Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 6:24 a.m.
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Used an iPad today
>>
>> Well stated, a
I think it is nice that we can buy something off the shelf just like everyone
else does. The rip off is the price they charge us for making these devices
assessable for the blind.
Personally I'm not into buying a computer and then paying the same price for a
screen reader.
On Apr 6, 2010, at 3:2
I completely agree! No other company has implemented accessibility in the same
way that apple has, and I love the fact that I pay the same price for my
products as everyone else does. I don't feel like my iPad is a rip off because
of the added productivity it allows me. I love being able to ta
36 matches
Mail list logo
