Hear hear, I entirely agree. Let's leave it to our gently regulated
discretion.
Simon
On 25 Mar 2009, at 17:32, Chris Blouch wrote:
>
> I'm certainly guilty of being off topic and worthy of the ban. At the
> same time I'd like to think some lenience for off topic posts which
> have
> broad a
No problem with moderation, just trying to build some consensus as to
what the moderation rules should be. The one liner posts that reduce the
signal to noise ratio probably fall more into the bucket of bad
net-etiquette and not so much of an off-topic post. The downside of
moderation is that s
agreed, Chris. well said.
On 25-Mar-09, at 10:32 AM, Chris Blouch wrote:
>
> I'm certainly guilty of being off topic and worthy of the ban. At the
> same time I'd like to think some lenience for off topic posts which
> have
> broad appeal to this list's readership has some positive benefit to
We had a poll where we could vote between letting this list go
unmoderated or keep it moderated, and there were a majority who voted
to moderate it. So its curious that now suddenly there are people
coming out of the woodwork saying that they would like it unmoderated.
It's one or the othe
any D
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:15 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Just waht is "off topic" here
>
>
> Agreed. Those of us who use VoiceOver may not be on all the
> technology
> lists and if it's something that benefits us all,
I'm certainly guilty of being off topic and worthy of the ban. At the
same time I'd like to think some lenience for off topic posts which have
broad appeal to this list's readership has some positive benefit to the
community. For myself this is one of the few public mailing list I
subscribe to
om: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tiffany D
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:15 PM
>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Just waht is "off topic" here
>>>
>&g
eing counted. Three yeas .
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tiffany D
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:15 PM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re:
.com] On Behalf Of Tiffany D
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 7:15 PM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Just waht is "off topic" here
>>
>>
>> Agreed. Those of us who use VoiceOver may not be on all the
>> technology
>> lists and if
15 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Just waht is "off topic" here
>
>
> Agreed. Those of us who use VoiceOver may not be on all the
> technology
> lists and if it's something that benefits us all, I think we should
> hear
> about i
is "off topic" here
Agreed. Those of us who use VoiceOver may not be on all the technology
lists and if it's something that benefits us all, I think we should hear
about it.
On 24/03/2009, Greg Kearney wrote:
>
> Just what qualifies as "off topic" and can there by
Hi Greg, well you answered your own question. :-) Anything Mac-
related is certainly on topic.
I'm sure sorry you feel like this is 'wrath' but I've gotten *many*
requests / complaints from list members whom pay for bandwidth, or
have limited time in which to read list mail, but who
Agreed. Those of us who use VoiceOver may not be on all the
technology lists and if it's something that benefits us all, I think
we should hear about it.
On 24/03/2009, Greg Kearney wrote:
>
> Just what qualifies as "off topic" and can there by bring down the
> wrath of the moderators here. If
13 matches
Mail list logo
