N800 and PhoneME

Hi all, the CDC runtime (PhoneME) running under the N800 (Diablo) is complaining about the java.beans.* package (needed by the apache.log4j) not being present. I was under the impression that it does include it - anyone else able to run the CDC runtime on the N800 with the java.beans package i

Re: GSoC 2010, eBook reader. Looking for feedback and ideas.

On 21 May 2010 14:46, Juhana Jauhiainen wrote: > I've set up a blog at http://durriken.org/blog/ and a repository at > http://gitorious.org/maemo-ebook-reader-gsoc-2010 so you can follow my > progress. > > ___ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-dev

Re: sp-endurance and device memory usage

On 21 May 2010 14:29, Eero Tamminen wrote: > I might be wrong, but I think I've seen that issue about >> Fennec somewhere and have a feeling it got addressed. Well, certainly >> many issues in Fennec were addressed, as the latest beta (and nightly >> builds) are actually usable and not that terri

Re: GSoC 2010, eBook reader. Looking for feedback and ideas.

I've set up a blog at http://durriken.org/blog/ and a repository at http://gitorious.org/maemo-ebook-reader-gsoc-2010 so you can follow my progress. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maem

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

This whole thing has been horrible from the start. I was happily coding, learning to use Qt in a mobile environment, and then the autobuilder got switched to a version NO ONE has on their phone. I can build my app locally and it will run great on my n900, but as soon as I download it from extras-de

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On 21/05/2010 09:34, Ville M. Vainio wrote: > No, it means PR1.2 will probably happen sooner than you think. And we've never been so close to the release! -- Yves-Alexis ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.or

Re: Qt SDK + Qt + scratchbox?

On Friday 21 May 2010 15:26:01 Felipe Crochik wrote: > I actually find the Xephyr/Scratchbox/x86 phase helpful during the > development. I like being able to just test the changes on a "window" on my > desktop instead of having to get the device. Do you know if it is > possible/easy to setup Qt SDK

RE: Qt SDK + Qt + scratchbox?

> What do you mean? These packages are from official Fremantle repository, > while libqt4-maemo5-* are from extras-devel, which yet to be enabled. But right now enabling the extras-devel allows people to install qt applications compiled against libqt4-maemo5 because these packages are also availa

Re: Qt SDK + Qt + scratchbox?

Hi Felipe! On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: > Hi Daniil, > >> You can skip Xephyr/Scratchbox/x86 phase completely. >> Skipping Qt Creator phase is an option too. > > I actually find the Xephyr/Scratchbox/x86 phase helpful during the > development. I like being able to just t

Re: sp-endurance and device memory usage

Hi, ext Dawid Lorenz wrote: PR1.2 fixes last known wakeup-on-background issue in microb engine (related to animated images, reported also to upstream mozilla). When I last tested Fennec few months ago on my N900, it was constantly waking up on the background, so I would suggest at least closing

RE: Qt SDK + Qt + scratchbox?

Hi Daniil, > You can skip Xephyr/Scratchbox/x86 phase completely. > Skipping Qt Creator phase is an option too. I actually find the Xephyr/Scratchbox/x86 phase helpful during the development. I like being able to just test the changes on a "window" on my desktop instead of having to get the devic

Re: Qt SDK + Qt + scratchbox?

Hi Felipe! On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote: > I have tried Qt creator on windows and linux. At this time I write the > applications using Qt Creator, commit my changes to a SVN repository and > then within scratchbox environment I get the changes from the repository, > compi

Qt SDK + Qt + scratchbox?

I have tried Qt creator on windows and linux. At this time I write the applications using Qt Creator, commit my changes to a SVN repository and then within scratchbox environment I get the changes from the repository, compile the code and try them on Xephyr/Scratchbox/x86. Assuming that it works, I

Re: Tetrinet

I once write Mtetrinet http://maemo.org/downloads/product/OS2008/mtetrinet/ Since there were basically no users, i lost interest in maintaining it. But feel free to port it to n900. Till - original Nachricht Betreff: Tetrinet Gesendet: Fr, 21. Mai 2010 Von: Conrad Calmez Hi there

The First N900 Coding Competition

Hi everybody, I am writing this for those who do not visit the forum very often. Great news for all Maemo developers: the First N900 Coding Competition is started! All details on the forum thread: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=53112 A community effort born as a single-man idea, then back

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On Friday 21 May 2010 01:42:43 you wrote: > 1.As today what a developer needs to do to get an application that > uses qt to the end user? Is there a way to tell the autobuilder to compile > against the 4.5 qt and make the package only depend on it? In theory you just depend on the proper versi

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:00 +0200, ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia piątek, 21 maja 2010 o 09:55:29 Nicola Mfb napisał(a): > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Ville M. Vainio > > wrote: [...] > > > > > No, it means PR1.2 will probably happen sooner than you think. If > > > > A not-affirmati

Tetrinet

Hi there, has anyone heard of a Tetrinet port for Maemo 5? I'd be very interessted about any possible development that may has happend. I also would try to participate (I will need help to do that for sure) on the development. BR C ___ maemo-developers

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On Friday 21 May 2010 07:06:35 Ville M. Vainio wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Felipe Crochik wrote: > > As today what a developer needs to do to get an application that uses qt > > to the end user? Is there a way to tell the autobuilder to compile > > against the 4.5 qt and make the pac

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: [...] >> A not-affirmative sentence ("will not be released for sure before X >> weeks") may help developers to decide. > > nOKIA will not tell you that. My bet is 12 November - until that I will use > LR1.2 on my phone (LR == Leaked Relea

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

Dnia piątek, 21 maja 2010 o 09:55:29 Nicola Mfb napisał(a): > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Ville M. Vainio > wrote: [...] > > > No, it means PR1.2 will probably happen sooner than you think. If > > A not-affirmative sentence ("will not be released for sure before X > weeks") may help develop

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote: [...] > No, it means PR1.2 will probably happen sooner than you think. If A not-affirmative sentence ("will not be released for sure before X weeks") may help developers to decide. Regards Niko _

Maemo on Toshiba Journ.E Touch?

Just came across the Journ.E TouchInternet tablet which is obviously nice hardware but running WindowsCE. Since it is also based on the ARM architecture, I really wonder if it was possible to install Maemo/ARM instead? Th

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> The developer should wait for pr 1.2. At this point in time all the >> work spent on dealing with PR1.1 is wasted effort. > > Which means that whole work spent on dealing with Maemo is also wasted. Nokia > wants to be good at scarying

Re: QT Packages, Repositories and PR1.2

Dnia piątek, 21 maja 2010 o 07:06:35 Ville M. Vainio napisał(a): > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Felipe Crochik wrote: > > As today what a developer needs to do to get an application that uses qt > > to the end user? Is there a way to tell the autobuilder to compile > > against the 4.5 qt and m