Hi Attila and all,
2011/1/27 Attila Csipa :
> On Thursday 27 January 2011 18:07:32 Andrew Flegg wrote:
>> Unless we take extraordinary (and almost certainly self-defeating)
>> actions like requiring KISStester to be installed to use any software
>> from Extras-(devel|testing).
>
> In fact, I would
http://wiki.maemo.org/ICD_Policy_Plugins
This should mean people can have more control over how icd2 manages
networks (e.g. how it chooses which network to connect to at any given time)
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
http
This sounds like an even more interesting idea! It would be make for a very
not-exclusive-to-maemo project. Isn't any of the distributions working on
something like this? Why not?
For maemo the issue then becomes that it is not about just finding
developers to write an application but that we also
On Thursday 27 January 2011 18:07:32 Andrew Flegg wrote:
> Unless we take extraordinary (and almost certainly self-defeating)
> actions like requiring KISStester to be installed to use any software
> from Extras-(devel|testing).
In fact, I would very specifically argue against such an approach. Th
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Felipe Crochik wrote:
> I have to say that I like how the 3 of them work. If we are going to take on
> making a better tool we should aim high. It needs to be more than an
> "application manager" it needs to be a tool for the user to find and decide
> among all th
Hi,
the short-version: It's a lookup tool for license plates. It's
interesting to know from which regions of a country the other peoples
come. Or you can play a game with other people to guess right from which
region the car comes ;)
kfzcheck has different files for many countrys (in which it is
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 15:29, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 27 January 2011 16:25, Felipe Crochik wrote:
>> Sorry if the question is silly but why do you think enhancing HAM is better
>> than creating a new application based on appdownloader, FAP and KISSTester?
>
> all I know is that all peopl
Sorry I did again... Here is the message:
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Crochik [mailto:fel...@crochik.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:01 AM
To: 'a.gra...@gmail.com'
Cc: 'maemo-developers@maemo.org'
Subject: RE: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
That is scary :)
I have never ch
I wouldn't mind testing it. Can you tell us what it is about?
Felipe
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Beck
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:54 AM
To: maemo-developers
Subject: Re: adaptation of
That is scary :)
I have never checked out the source code of any of them and don't even know
who the FAP developer is.
I have to say that I like how the 3 of them work. If we are going to take on
making a better tool we should aim high. It needs to be more than an
"application manager" it needs t
Hi,
at the beginning of the n900 device with maemo 5 many people have seen a
risk at installing applications from extras-devel. I think the most
important problem was the full rootfs (not optified). I mean after pr1.2
was the problem no more possible, but the users has still not installed
apps fro
Hi,
On 27 January 2011 16:25, Felipe Crochik wrote:
> Sorry if the question is silly but why do you think enhancing HAM is better
> than creating a new application based on appdownloader, FAP and KISSTester?
all I know is that all people I asked to, told me that they would
prefer to have a scorp
Sorry wrong button Hit reply and not reply to all this is the
message I just sent to Andrew:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felipe Crochik
Date: Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
To: Andrew Flegg
Andrew,
Sorry if the question is
We have had this discussion few months back but unfortunately it didn't lead
to any action.
It seems that the pieces are out there: appdownloader, Faster Application
Manager and maybe the "testing" application (can't remember the
name...sorry). I think, at least, the first two are Qt based and, h
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 15:09, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 27 January 2011 16:05, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
>> There are a lot of people using extras-testing and even extras-devel.
>> Not many of them know or care about the web voting and approval system.
>
> or better... we need a way to let peopl
Hi,
On 27 January 2011 16:05, Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> There are a lot of people using extras-testing and even extras-devel.
> Not many of them know or care about the web voting and approval system.
+1 :)
or better... we need a way to let people know if the application
listed come from stable, te
On czw, 2011-01-27 at 15:16 +0100, Patrick Beck wrote:
> Because many people don't use extras-testing and
> extras-devel. Lots of people haven't seen the apps and can decide if
> it can be useful and give feedback to me for improvements.
There are a lot of people using extras-testing and even ext
Hi,
i have the same problem with my two applications. kfzcheck [1] and
kfzcheck-extras [2]. Because many people don't use extras-testing and
extras-devel. Lots of people haven't seen the apps and can decide if it
can be useful and give feedback to me for improvements.
The two apps are now in test
Hi!
2011/1/27 Riku Voipio :
> On 01/25/2011 05:24 PM, ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:03, Felipe Crochik wrote:
>>> A new version of an existing application should have a lower barrier to
>>> promotion than a new application.
>
>> It's obvious; but even a minor change can ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
