Hi,
What I'm trying to say is we should have a Wiki section with
everything easily available together.
I'll be on it soon.
Best Regards,
Philippe
Original Message
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:57:27
Hi,
Do you have a libgcj/libgij package for maemo?
Thanks,
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Koen Kooi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is anyone working on this currently? I might seriously look into it
very soon.
Thanks,
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tapani Pälli wrote:
ext Philip
Hi Clemens,
OK, thx. Could you tell us where did you find the corresponding
packages for JamVM and Classpath as the ones I have found does not
install correctly ?
Fabrice Di Meglio
On Mar 9, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Please explain:
"(Free)Swing runs nice on 770."
Wel
> Please explain:
> "(Free)Swing runs nice on 770."
Well when I tried to run JamVM+Classpath on my 770 Swing examples ran
fine except the issues I explained.
lg Clemens
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailm
Please explain:
"(Free)Swing runs nice on 770."
Fabrice Di Meglio
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
I also think, that a Java J2ME Personal Profile implementation (which includes
AWT) and addtional eSWT would be the best solution for the Nokia 770. If
possible the JVM should use the Jazelle extension
> I also think, that a Java J2ME Personal Profile implementation (which includes
> AWT) and addtional eSWT would be the best solution for the Nokia 770. If
> possible the JVM should use the Jazelle extension of the ARM CPU in the Nokia
> 770. Swing isn't necessary, and in my opinion not really a go
> For me, SWT provides a very nice integration to the host UI.
> As it uses the host UI widgets, the overhead is minimal compare to a
> full java implementation.
I also think, that a Java J2ME Personal Profile implementation (which includes
AWT) and addtional eSWT would be the best solution for
Hi,
The GTK+ port of Classpath does the same for its AWT...
Regards,
--
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fred Lefévère-Laaoide wrote:
For me, SWT provides a
For me, SWT provides a very nice integration to the host UI.
As it uses the host UI widgets, the overhead is minimal compare to a
full java implementation.
Resources are scarce on the 770 ...
Fred
Philippe Laporte wrote:
Hej,
I'm quite interested in your argument for it...
Regards,
Phi
Hej,
I'm quite interested in your argument for it...
Regards,
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fred Lefévère-Laaoide wrote:
Great !
I think SWT is the way
Great !
I think SWT is the way to go !
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
After little hacking I've successfully executed MIDlet on Maemo SDK
using MicroEmulator. Here is screenshot of SimpleDemo MIDlet:
http://www.barteo.net/microemulator/j2me-maemo.png
Because of problems with AWT and Sw
Hello,
After little hacking I've successfully executed MIDlet on Maemo SDK
using MicroEmulator. Here is screenshot of SimpleDemo MIDlet:
http://www.barteo.net/microemulator/j2me-maemo.png
Because of problems with AWT and Swing, I've decided to give SWT a
chance (there is already support for that
ext Philippe Laporte wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm forwarding this to other relevant lists as well.
>
> The 770 window manager is Matchbox: http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/
>
> Is the color map problem already assigned to someone?
>
Expose-events work in 770 normally, bug is in the application/libra
Hi,
I'm forwarding this to other relevant lists as well.
The 770 window manager is Matchbox: http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/
Is the color map problem already assigned to someone?
Best Regards,
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 16:51, ext Luis Montes wrote:
It still would be nice to hear something from them. For all the java
talk on this list over the last few months, I've yet to see a response
from an @nokia email.
(This is a response from @nokia email.)
We c
Philippe Laporte
Software
Gatespace Telematics
Första Långgatan 18
41328 Göteborg
Sweden
Phone: +46 702 04 35 11
Fax: +46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weinehall David (Nokia-M/Tampere) wrote:
On tis, 2006-03-07 at 15:26 +0100, ext Philippe Laporte wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
[apologies for separate reply, other lists didn't bounce, only
moderated]
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
> >There are just two sides with different opinions. They have their
> >opinion.
> >FSF/GNU classpath has theirs.
> >
> >
>
> Well then we all want to know wh
On tis, 2006-03-07 at 15:26 +0100, ext Philippe Laporte wrote:
>
> Michael Koch wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Well then we all want to know what Nokia's legions of lawyers have to
> >>say...:-)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I'm sure they will
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:49:32PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
Well then we all want to know what Nokia's legions of lawyers have to
say...:-)
I'm sure they will introduce just another opinion.
ok, but what assets does FSF have to lose...?
__
.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
---- Original Message
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
From: Jesper Zuschlag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, March 07, 2006 12:43 pm
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Sound fine. But you will not get far without a Java environment
/ J
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 16:51, ext Luis Montes wrote:
> It still would be nice to hear something from them. For all the java
> talk on this list over the last few months, I've yet to see a response
> from an @nokia email.
(This is a response from @nokia email.)
We cannot comment on product featur
mentation,
- create graphics support (MIDP part) to GTK+.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
From: Jesper Zuschlag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, March 07, 2006 12:43 pm
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Sound fine
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:37:17PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote:
If you link native to a GPL VM, then that code must also be GPL, no?
That is an absolute requirement in the embedded world...
That is true. But running java bytecode in with a
cs support (MIDP part) to GTK+.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
From: Jesper Zuschlag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, March 07, 2006 12:43 pm
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Sound fine. But you will not get fa
t work for that port would be in:
- choosing JVM,
- create CLDC implementation,
- create graphics support (MIDP part) to GTK+.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
From: Jesper Zuschlag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue,
port of Classpath AWT would not work?
Is everyone with me when I say: "let's make AWT work first, then we can
talk about Swing"?
Thanks,
Philippe
Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:46:16 +0100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've read some discussion on that list about the possibility of running
> J2ME MIDlets on Nokia 770. As I've found, the problem is because of
> lack of J2ME implementation for that device. I'm an author of
> Micro
+46 31 24 16 50
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. Most work for that port would be in:
- choosing JVM,
- create CLDC implementation,
- create graphics support (MIDP part) to GTK+.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
Original Message
Subject: Re: [maemo-deve
Hi Jesper,
Jesper Zuschlag wrote:
Sound fine. But you will not get far without a Java environment /
JVM, which is exactly what we are missing on the Nokia 770. I been
having
Actually, I have been playing with JamVM on the Nokia 770 and the parts
I had tested worked (albeit slow). I only p
Right. Most work for that port would be in:
- choosing JVM,
- create CLDC implementation,
- create graphics support (MIDP part) to GTK+.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
> From: Jesper Zuschlag <[EMA
Sound fine. But you will not get far without a Java environment /
JVM, which is exactly what we are missing on the Nokia 770. I been
having plans for implementing a CLDC JVM on the 770 but I have been
waiting for somebody to make 770 development on Mac OS X possible. I
don't think it is pos
770.
Regards,
Bartek Teodorczyk
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [maemo-developers] J2ME on Nokia 770
> From: Fabrice Di Meglio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, March 07, 2006 12:28 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org, Di Meglio F
Hi,
Thank you for this info. I have strong interest into java on the 770.
Could you tell me if you have support for CDC 1.1 or 1.0 ?
Regards,
Fabrice
On Mar 7, 2006, at 2:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've read some discussion on that list about the possibility of
running
J
Hello,
I've read some discussion on that list about the possibility of running
J2ME MIDlets on Nokia 770. As I've found, the problem is because of
lack of J2ME implementation for that device. I'm an author of
MicroEmulator (http://www.sf.net/projects/microemulator) - pure java
CLDC/MIDP implementa
35 matches
Mail list logo
