Re: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-10 Thread Quim Gil
Hi Frederic! ext Frederic Crozat wrote: > I'm going to play the devil advocate *on purpose* I'll keep trying to answer the best I know and can. > (I'm only commenting regarding Diablo release, not hardware release) And I'm commenting about the release process in general, not the Diablo release

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-09 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2008, 10:54 +0200 schrieb Luca Olivetti: > It's useful to know that a bug is fixed, what isn't useful is that the > fix isn't actually available Quim already answered this partially, let me also try to describe our bugmaster's point of view here. We could create new

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-09 Thread Andre Klapper
[an off-topic posting about fixed release dates. please stop reading if not interested.] Am Freitag, den 06.06.2008, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Krischan Keitsch: > Quality first! Releasing shouldn't _only_ be a management decision. When the > quality is as expected then the (scrum ?) team should hand ov

Re: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-08 Thread Krischan Keitsch
Am Samstag, 7. Juni 2008 schrieben Sie: > ... > > Quality first! Releasing shouldn't _only_ be a management > > decision. When the quality is as expected then the (scrum ?) > > team should hand over the responsibility to the management. > > They can then powerpoint the great event ;-) > > And this

Re: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-08 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En/na Frederic Crozat ha escrit: > >> >> Translation : images are ready (and have probably been ready for some >> time) and are held back for "media coverage" purpose. > > I wouldn't be so sure: packages in > http://catalogu

Re: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-08 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Frederic Crozat ha escrit: > > Translation : images are ready (and have probably been ready for some > time) and are held back for "media coverage" purpose. I wouldn't be so sure: packages in http://catalogue.tableteer.nokia.com/updates/diablo/ are being updated (or so it seems looking a

Re: About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-08 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 11:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi, I'm going to play the devil advocate *on purpose*, even if I know perfectly what constraints exist to release free software, both as a member of GNOME release team and a Mandriva employee working on Mandriva Linux distribution

About release dates (was RE: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-07 Thread quim.gil
Hi, > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Frederic Crozat wrote: >> > Remember that most people are not used to Nokia policy to embargo >> > any date (even estimate) regarding software (or hardware) release. True. These people need to understand that Nokia is a company watc

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-06 Thread Krischan Keitsch
Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2008 schrieben Sie: > Hi, > > Krischan Keitsch wrote: > > Quality first! Releasing shouldn't _only_ be a management decision. When > > the quality is as expected then the (scrum ?) team should hand over the > > responsibility to the management. They can then powerpoint the great

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-06 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Krischan Keitsch wrote: > Quality first! Releasing shouldn't _only_ be a management decision. When the > quality is as expected then the (scrum ?) team should hand over the > responsibility to the management. They can then powerpoint the great > event ;-) > Personally I consider fix release

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-06 Thread Krischan Keitsch
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Remember that most people are not used to Nokia policy to embargo any > > date (even estimate) regarding software (or hardware) release. > > For simplicity's sake, I don't know when Diablo will be released. Quality

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Aniello Del Sorbo
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:32 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marius Gedminas wrote: >> Personally, I'm disappointed that when a bug is closed as "fixed in >> diablo", as a user I've no idea how to get the updated package on my >> N810. > > Please excuse my disbelief ... you guys are the strangest

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Josh, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Please excuse my disbelief ... you guys are the strangest "users" I've > ever met. Just wondering - what was the point of this mail? That people subscribed to maemo-developers & using bugzilla aren't users? I'm just unclear how that's related to the bug jar,

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
Marius Gedminas escribió: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote: >> En/na Stephen Gadsby ha escrit: >> >>> 61 bugs were closed: >> I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and >> that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide >>

RE: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread josh.soref
Marius Gedminas wrote: > Personally, I'm disappointed that when a bug is closed as "fixed in > diablo", as a user I've no idea how to get the updated package on my > N810. Please excuse my disbelief ... you guys are the strangest "users" I've ever met. > I've got scratchbox handy, In fact, "I'v

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Luca Olivetti wrote: > En/na Stephen Gadsby ha escrit: > > > 61 bugs were closed: > > I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and > that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide > updated packages for chinook

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > FWIW, in Mozilla if someone says X is fixed, that just means there's a > code fix, it doesn't mean it has passed through all verification steps. And it's available in the next nightly, not hidden in a password protected directory. And it's very probable that the nex

RE: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread josh.soref
Frederic Crozat wrote: > Remember that most people are not used to Nokia policy to embargo any > date (even estimate) regarding software (or hardware) release. For simplicity's sake, I don't know when Diablo will be released. I also didn't know when Chinook was going to be released (in fact, I bel

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Frederic Crozat
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:51 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Gadsby wrote: >> 61 bugs were closed: > > Luca Olivetti wrote: >> I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and >> that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide >> updated packages for c

Fixing bugs the user can't check (was Re: maemo Bug Jar #7)

2008-06-05 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, ext Luca Olivetti wrote: > It's useful to know that a bug is fixed, what isn't useful is that the > fix isn't actually available In regular free software development a bug is generally solved when the code is implemented and available somewhere. It's up to you to go to the source and com

RE: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread josh.soref
Stephen Gadsby wrote: > A Quick Look at maemo Bugzilla > 2008.05.29 through 2008.06.04 > > As of 2008.06.04 maemo Bugzilla contains 3166 (+22 this week) items, > including 1152 open issues (-40 this week): > * 783 open bugs (-43 this week) > * 9 critical/blocker (-3 this week) > * 22 "

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit: > I suppose you think that black mail or threats is useful? What makes you think that? It's useful to know that a bug is fixed, what isn't useful is that the fix isn't actually available > As it happens, you can actually update your device to diablo prerel

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Eero Tamminen ha escrit: > Hi, > > ext Luca Olivetti wrote: >> En/na Stephen Gadsby ha escrit: >> >>> 61 bugs were closed: >> >> I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and >> that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide >> updated packages for

RE: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread josh.soref
Eero wrote: > I would like the close bug jar section to separate things that were > marked as wontfix from things that were fixed (or worksforme). seconded ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/list

RE: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread josh.soref
Stephen Gadsby wrote: > 61 bugs were closed: Luca Olivetti wrote: > I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and > that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide > updated packages for chinook. I suppose you think that black mail or threats is useful?

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-05 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, ext Luca Olivetti wrote: > En/na Stephen Gadsby ha escrit: > >> 61 bugs were closed: > > I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and > that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide > updated packages for chinook. I'm not sure everybody prefers

Re: maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-04 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Stephen Gadsby ha escrit: > 61 bugs were closed: I noticed that some of the bugs are marked as "fixed in diablo", and that's not really useful unless you release diablo rsn or provide updated packages for chinook. Bye -- Luca ___ maemo-develop

maemo Bug Jar #7

2008-06-04 Thread Stephen Gadsby
A Quick Look at maemo Bugzilla 2008.05.29 through 2008.06.04 As of 2008.06.04 maemo Bugzilla contains 3166 (+22 this week) items, including 1152 open issues (-40 this week): * 783 open bugs (-43 this week) * 9 critical/blocker (-3 this week) * 22 "moreinfo" (+4 this week) *