Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Jonathan Markevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Ryan Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The frustration for ME is not that this is new, it's that it's gotten > wearyingly old. But through the eyes of someone to whom this is new...

Re: MPlayer Slow Performance

On Thu, 1 May 2008 18:15:26 -0700 "Chiron Bloch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this is a dumb Q:, but what's your swap size set to (Control > panel>Memory>Virtual) None. Space is at a premium on my internal card. > Also, is the poor performance you refer to regarding the video > playback i

Re: OpenOffice (was Bluetooth keyboard?)

On Thu, 1 May 2008, Giacomo Tufano wrote: > Try to send an Office attach to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it SHOULD answer with a > pdf of the attach. If it works, I could try to find in Sun if the > service is really public and, therefore, if it can be used by anyone. > Just make of know if it works for you.

Re: MPlayer Slow Performance

I know this is a dumb Q:, but what's your swap size set to (Control panel>Memory>Virtual) Also, is the poor performance you refer to regarding the video playback itself? or the performance of the application's menu/control system during video playback. What video format (or formats) have you been p

MPlayer Slow Performance

I am finding it difficult to use MPlayer on my N810 with the kind of crummy CPU it ships with. Either it's terribly underpowered or MPlayer's vo backends just need to be better optimized for the architecture. I've experimented with -cache 8192, -framedrop, -fps n, and even -ao none. Each of these

Adobe lifts licensing fees for Flash lite

@qgil mirrored my thoughts on this one, thought the list might like to see this. http://constantine.jaiku.com/presence/33529593 ___ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Ryan Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a) Oh boy another online registration! And for Bugzilla! Which is more > > annoying, the missing features or the way of reporting them? (trick > > question, bugzilla of course). > > > See previous threads, not gonna start

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Thursday 01 May 2008 21:13:05 Jonathan Markevich wrote: > a) Oh boy another online registration! And for Bugzilla! Which is more > annoying, the missing features or the way of reporting them? (trick > question, bugzilla of course). The GPE bugzilla is the best place to record suggestions, if

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

Jonathan Markevich wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ryan Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > I have quite a few more suggestions for the calendar but I > don't know where to send them either. > > Always look for a project's bug tracker i

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ryan Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have quite a few more suggestions for the calendar but I don't know > > where to send them either. > > > Always look for a project's bug tracker instead of letting ideas or bugs > fester - in this case, it's http://bugs

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

> > I have quite a few more suggestions for the calendar but I don't know > where to send them either. Always look for a project's bug tracker instead of letting ideas or bugs fester - in this case, it's http://bugs.linuxtogo.org/ but that took me very little time on the good ol' google to fin

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Jonathan Markevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (snip) > After that, it would be *nice to have* a few other things, but without them > it's still very workable. > > I have quite a few more suggestions for the calendar but I don't know where > to send them either. >

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:42 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been playing with the todo list lately, I can probably work with it. Wanted stuff below. > What I do like about GPE is that it doesn't have a limit on the number > of categories available (at least, not one I've encountered; I was >

Re: Decent PIM for the N8x0

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:39:31PM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On Tuesday 29 April 2008 15:18:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: > > > I kind of wish that someone would start up an oposing PIM .. Any takers? > > > 450$ to play Mahjong or

Re: Solved. Was: Battery life VERY short on N810, last OS2008...

Glad to hear you worked it out - good to know those items in any case. I suppose the next step would be to file a bug with those projects, possibly with an strace (I think?) result to find out what they're doing when not being used. I have not yet had the same good luck as you and get about 1-

Solved. Was: Battery life VERY short on N810, last OS2008...

Battery problem has been solved. I had 1 critical issue and 2 minimal ones on battery life. First and worst was pidgin. The software is very aggressive when the net goes down. RTComm beta is more 'quiet'. I use it ever 'on' autoconnecting when network is up. Pidgin, apparently, don't like this app