Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-09-05 Thread Klaus Rotter
Gary wrote: Yes, the N900 supports HSDPA per the specs here: http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/specifications Oh, it's finally here, my swiss army knife. They didn't forget the TV-Out this time. Great. I really hope that this time the N9xx series will last some years - with updates for the first

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-09-02 Thread John B. Holmblad
Gary, thanks for the clarification and for sharing the info about the new Verizon Wireless (EVDO/HDSPA) modem product. Regarding Verizon Wireless plans to build out their own UMTS/HSDPA/EDGE/GSM Radio Access Network in the U.S. I expect that they will do that in the 700 mhz band where they

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-31 Thread Gary
sebastian maemo wrote: I would say that N900 will have HSDPA support. I cannot even imagine the contrary... Yes, the N900 supports HSDPA per the specs here: http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/specifications In my original post, I was referring to the fact that Verizon is currently developing its own

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-31 Thread Gary
Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote: So, why are Visor PDAs dead then ? They're no more dead than the Commodore 64, the Amiga, BeOS, OS/2, OpenVMS, etc. So long as there's a niche user base, there will be niche developers. But don't expect there to be any huge advances in technology for any of those

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-31 Thread Mark
On 8/31/09, Gary g...@eyetraxx.net wrote: Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote: So, why are Visor PDAs dead then ? They're no more dead than the Commodore 64, the Amiga, BeOS, OS/2, OpenVMS, etc. So long as there's a niche user base, there will be niche developers. But don't expect there to be any

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread sebastian maemo
2009/8/30 John B. Holmblad jholmb...@hotmail.com Gary, your response suggests that the initial release of the N900 will not support HSDPA. If that is the case then it would seem that the N900 will have poor network performance due to a bandwidth limitation when the device is used on

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread sebastian maemo
2009/8/20 Eugene Antimirov tur...@gmail.com Hi everyone! I'm sure all of you are eager to look at the newest N900. Here is the first review of the device by Eldar Murtazin, Russian mobile columnist. Hi, for me the big question is... Will I be able to install an XTERM application?... Will

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread Valerio Valerio
Hello, On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebastian maemo sebastian.ma...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/20 Eugene Antimirov tur...@gmail.com Hi everyone! I'm sure all of you are eager to look at the newest N900. Here is the first review of the device by Eldar Murtazin, Russian mobile columnist.

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread sebastian maemo
2009/8/30 Valerio Valerio vdv...@gmail.com for me the big question is... Will I be able to install an XTERM application?... Will I be able to install a GNU shell, like BASH?... and even more important than that... Will I be able to login as ROOT? If not, then for me it's just another

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread Peter Flynn
[Sebastian] for me the big question is... Will I be able to install an XTERM application?... Will I be able to install a GNU shell, like BASH?... and even more important than that... Will I be able to login as ROOT? These too are deal-breakers. No shell means no go, period. No Emacs, no

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread David Greaves
Peter Flynn wrote: [Sebastian] for me the big question is... Will I be able to install an XTERM application?... Will I be able to install a GNU shell, like BASH?... and even more important than that... Will I be able to login as ROOT? These too are deal-breakers. No shell means no

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread Peter Flynn
[David] Maybe holding the unjustified vitriol until you read the reply that came *3 minutes* after the post? (and well over an hour before you posted). My apologies for the crossed wires: I'm away from base so my access is sporadic, and messages don't always arrive as promptly as one might

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-30 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Peter Flynn wrote: [David] Maybe holding the unjustified vitriol until you read the reply that came *3 minutes* after the post? (and well over an hour before you posted). My apologies for the crossed wires: I'm away from base so my access is sporadic, and messages don't always

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-29 Thread John B. Holmblad
Mark, it was surely a RD cost driven decision for Nokia to not provide a version of Freemantle that would work on the N800 and N810. Of course, technically speaking, they could have done something to provide a back-port to older hardware, even if some Freemantle features had to be suppressed.

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-29 Thread Alexandru Cardaniuc
Mark wolfm...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Kevin T. Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote: Not at all.  The complaint I responded to was that Nokia would drop software updates for the N900 as soon as the next hardware came out, which it may or may not do.  But it

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-29 Thread John B. Holmblad
Gary, your response suggests that the initial release of the N900 will not support HSDPA. If that is the case then it would seem that the N900 will have poor network performance due to a bandwidth limitation when the device is used on mobile networks. I must be misinterpreting your remarks

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:11 -0500 schrieb mathew: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 15:56, Dr. Nicholas Shaw d...@docharley.com wrote: Nope. Won't run and won't be available. Well, that's a shame for Nokia, 'cause I'm not about to buy a new device unless I can verify that the

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread mathew
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 15:56, Dr. Nicholas Shaw d...@docharley.com wrote: Nope. Won't run and won't be available. Well, that's a shame for Nokia, 'cause I'm not about to buy a new device unless I can verify that the various deficiencies of the N800 OS have been fixed. Also, I doubt if it's

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread sean
Andre Klapper wrote: For your interest the Mer project aims to provide a community backport of Fremantle for N8x0 devices. See http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer for more information. andre Is support for the 900 being considered in the development of Mer? I did not see it mentioned anywhere.

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Kevin T. Neely
I don't understand why that's such a big deal. *all* hardware gets tossed aside eventually. Mobile just happens more often than others because the development space is so fast. If you want something that you can keep around for a while, get a big desktop. That probably has the longest

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Kevin T. Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote: I don't understand why that's such a big deal.  all hardware gets tossed aside eventually. You could not be more wrong. I'm still using my Handspring Visor Deluxe every day because it does things that *no* other

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Kevin T. Neely
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote: You could not be more wrong. I'm still using my Handspring Visor Deluxe every day because it does things that *no* other device can do, When is the last time you had a software update for these devices? -- In Vino Veritas

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Kevin T. Neely
Not at all. The complaint I responded to was that Nokia would drop software updates for the N900 as soon as the next hardware came out, which it may or may not do. But it doesn't really matter because the tech moves so fast, older hardware just isn't useful anymore. Maybe the Visor is fine for

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Kevin T. Neelyktne...@astroturfgarden.com wrote: Not at all.  The complaint I responded to was that Nokia would drop software updates for the N900 as soon as the next hardware came out, which it may or may not do.  But it doesn't really matter because the tech

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread sean
Kevin T. Neely wrote: I don't understand why that's such a big deal. /all/ hardware gets tossed aside eventually. Mobile just happens more often than others because the development space is so fast. If you want something that you can keep around for a while, get a big desktop. That

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Adilson Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Em 27-08-2009 18:27, sean escreveu: The wireless/Internet stuff was weak, but as a PIM and more, it could be used completely right out of the box. Palm put out updates for what seemed like ages. I truly hope Nokia adds a good PIN in it.

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-27 Thread Peter Bart
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:23 -0700, Kevin T. Neely wrote: I don't understand why that's such a big deal. all hardware gets tossed aside eventually. Mobile just happens more often than others because the development space is so fast. If you want something that you can keep around for a

N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Eugene Antimirov
Hi everyone! I'm sure all of you are eager to look at the newest N900. Here is the first review of the device by Eldar Murtazin, Russian mobile columnist. In English - http://www.mobile-review.com/review/nokia-rx51-n900-en.shtml Russian version -

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Kevin T. Neely
I have to say, I'm pretty excited about the N900. That looks like Canola in the pictures. If they integrated that into the base system, the Maemo team did a very smart thing there. Looking forward to hearing more about it from Nokia World.announcements. K On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:58 AM,

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Adilson Oliveira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Em 20-08-2009 14:32, Kevin T. Neely escreveu: I have to say, I'm pretty excited about the N900. That looks like Canola in the pictures. If they integrated that into the base system, the Maemo team did a very smart thing there. Some time ago I

RE: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Dr. Nicholas Shaw
One thing concerns me based upon earlier reviews - it appears that the size of the screen will be smaller. That may not be a big issue as it appears from the pictures that Nokia is utilizing the space better than the 810. Only time will tell. It also looks like they've added capabilities (such

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Gary
Dr. Nicholas Shaw wrote: Now, if ATT has the N900 when it comes out I'll be set. If not, I'll keep using my N810. :-) My guess is that -- like their other mobile phone products -- if you buy direct from Nokia it won't be carrier locked. -Gary

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Erik Hovland
Dr. Nicholas Shaw wrote: Now, if ATT has the N900 when it comes out I'll be set.  If not, I'll keep using my N810. :-) My guess is that -- like their other mobile phone products -- if you buy direct from Nokia it won't be carrier locked. That is all well and good. But T-Mobile is listed as

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Cassio Gomes
I´m worried about the elder versions, like N8x0, that became very popular in Brazil. Will Maemo 5 support 'em and bring us more development teams, doin' basic useful stuff like a text editor and makin' N8x0 better? Now, I see it as a great gadget, but it´s too limited due the lack of softwares

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 20:11, Dr. Nicholas Shawd...@docharley.com wrote: I'm hoping that they've added the ability to select 12/24-hour time. No need to hope, that's been known for a *long* time (over a year in fact): https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303 And, more specifically:

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 20:21, Cassio Gomesgome...@gmail.com wrote: I´m worried about the elder versions, like N8x0, that became very popular in Brazil. Will Maemo 5 support 'em and bring us more development teams, doin' basic useful stuff like a text editor and makin' N8x0 better? No, the

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Cassio Gomesgome...@gmail.com wrote: I´m worried about the elder versions, like N8x0, that became very popular in Brazil. Will Maemo 5 support 'em and bring us more development teams, doin' basic useful stuff like a text editor and makin' N8x0 better? Now, I

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Eugene Antimirov tur...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone! I'm sure all of you are eager to look at the newest N900. Here is the first review of the device by Eldar Murtazin, Russian mobile columnist. In English -

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Erik Hovland wrote: Dr. Nicholas Shaw wrote: Now, if ATT has the N900 when it comes out I'll be set. If not, I'll keep using my N810. :-) My guess is that -- like their other mobile phone products -- if you buy direct from Nokia it won't be carrier locked. That is all

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Andrew Fleggand...@bleb.org wrote: Well, since Mer's based on Ubuntu, thousands of packags are only an apt-get away... This is propaganda and a myth. Sure, you may be able to _install_ apps from the Ubuntu repository, but whether they'll be usable on the device

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 13:28 -0600 schrieb Mark: No, and when Maemo X comes along, they'll be abandoning N900 owners just like they _already_ have N770 and N8x0 owners. Once they leave the factory, any further software development for the tablets is left up to the community... What if

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Fernando Cassiafcas...@gmail.com wrote: Looks very exciting. I remember telling on this very same list that what killed the Nxx tablet series was basically that it lacked a GSM radio, in other words, a phone. Hence the device didn't fit Nokia's product line, as

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Andre Klapperaklap...@openismus.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2009, 13:28 -0600 schrieb Mark: No, and when Maemo X comes along, they'll be abandoning N900 owners just like they _already_ have N770 and N8x0 owners. Once they leave the factory, any further

RE: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Dr. Nicholas Shaw
Unlocked would be good and would, I suspect, resolve the issue. Thanks! Nick. -Original Message- From: maemo-users-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-users-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Gary Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:14 PM To: maemo-users@maemo.org Subject: Re: N900/Maemo 5

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote: Good luck with that. The processing power on these things is deliberately modest, at least partly because there is a very valid power conservation issue, and Java can be sluggish even on a fast PC. This is a myth. I've run

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Gary
Jason Edgecombe wrote: I prefer Verizon's coverage area, but they don't do GSM, :( Not yet. They're already working on a hybrid EV-DO/HSPA modem (http://tr.im/nX3C) and are moving fast on building out their HSPA buildout (http://tr.im/nX47). I've also read that some test markets will be in place

RE: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Dr. Nicholas Shaw
Nope. Won't run and won't be available. Nick. -Original Message- From: maemo-users-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-users-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Scott Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:39 PM To: maemo-users users; maemo-commun...@maemo.org Subject: Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 21:39, Scottsc...@sw41.com wrote: Is there any chance that the new OS for the N900 would run or be available for the N8x0 crowd? No. You've four choices: 1) Keep Diablo. 2) Use and support Mer: http://wiki.maemo.org/Mer (which can be considered a backport of

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Fernando Cassiafcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote: Good luck with that. The processing power on these things is deliberately modest, at least partly because there is a very valid power conservation issue,

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 20 August 2009 23:23:16 Mark wrote: I personally am growing very weary of non-hot-swappable slots in devices. There really is no justification for that PITA. It's just one of many reasons I'll never give up my N800 for an N810. The N810 has a fully hot swappable slot, it will

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Gary
Mark wrote: That's an excuse (and a poor one), not a reason. When they never get around to actually finishing the OS or software for the N9X0, you'll be hearing I told you so... Mobile processors are is going through upgrade cycles much faster than the desktop and server processor market.

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 20 August 2009 23:29:21 Peter Flynn wrote: It doesn't look like the camera can be used backwards like the N800's pop-out one. That was crippled by lack of software; presumably this one is usable with Skype etc, but a pity if it can't be used as a webcam. Based on the preview, the

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Fernando Cassiafcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Mark wolfm...@gmail.com wrote: Good luck with that. The processing power on these things is deliberately modest,

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Attila Csipa
On Thursday 20 August 2009 23:42:55 Attila Csipa wrote: The N810 has a fully hot swappable slot, it will even automatically (un)mount the device if you open/close the microSD card lid. Sorry, that was supposed to be miniSD. But it's definitely hot-swappable regardless of that :)

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Garyg...@eyetraxx.net wrote: Mark wrote: That's an excuse (and a poor one), not a reason. When they never get around to actually finishing the OS or software for the N9X0, you'll be hearing I told you so... Mobile processors are is going through upgrade

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Attila Csipama...@csipa.in.rs wrote: On Thursday 20 August 2009 23:23:16 Mark wrote:  I personally am growing very weary of non-hot-swappable slots in devices. There really is no justification for that PITA. It's just one of many reasons I'll never give up my

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Fernando Cassiafcas...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking Java ME and JavaFX Mobile. Both of which are designed to run on smartphones. FC Yes, because they are lite versions, not real Java, and will only run the tiny apps written especially for them. But if

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Gary
Mark wrote: That's a straw-man fallacy. Have I somehow misrepresented your position? If not, then it's not a straw man argument or an informal fallacy. If you throw enough swap at an OS you can run anything but an I/O bound device is still bound whether it's portable or not. Unfortunately,

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Garyg...@eyetraxx.net wrote: Mark wrote: That's a straw-man fallacy. Have I somehow misrepresented your position? If not, then it's not a straw man argument or an informal fallacy. If you throw enough swap at an OS you can run anything but an I/O bound

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Attila Csipama...@csipa.in.rs wrote: On Friday 21 August 2009 00:33:54 Mark wrote: Let's see... one miniSDHC (not micro, meaning you need a micro- to miniSD adapter for it to really be useful) compared to - count 'em - two full-sized SDHC slots, both accessible

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Igor Stoppa
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 01:38 +0200, ext Mark wrote: many other devices these days are putting the microSD slot under the battery. Grrr... for the very same reason why the SIM is located there in the vast majority (all?) of phones: to prevent hot swap and simplify its management. If you were to

Re: N900/Maemo 5 review

2009-08-20 Thread Mark
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Igor Stoppaigor.sto...@nokia.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 01:38 +0200, ext Mark wrote:  many other devices these days are putting the microSD slot under the battery. Grrr... for the very same reason why the SIM is located there in the vast majority (all?)