James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 22:44, andre999 wrote:
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */upd
Le 2011-06-10 20:13, Barry Jackson a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:08, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Barry
Thanks for doing this. I uncompressed the file. What is the difference
between the 2 .rpms? You may want to include a "readme" in the package
for people like me.
Cheers
Marc
Marc,
It is not really re
On 10/06/11 15:08, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi Barry
Thanks for doing this. I uncompressed the file. What is the difference
between the 2 .rpms? You may want to include a "readme" in the package
for people like me.
Cheers
Marc
Marc,
It is not really ready for general consumption yet (although it d
On 10/06/11 18:06, Anssi Hannula wrote:
I didn't test it, but the problems I see now:
1. The MD5SUM isn't checked, IMO it should be.
I was just discussing that on IRC with Ahmad ;)
I now have that working OK
2. On error you exit with "|| exit 1" but leave
the files in /tmp, polluting it
On 10/06/11 22:44, andre999 wrote:
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updat
2011/6/11 JA Magallón :
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:45:03 +0200, JA Magallón wrote:
>
>> Hi all...
>>
>> I have a problem with this first big change in Cauldron...
>> I have a couple test boxes in which I have updated everything, and I can't
>> get Gnome 3 to work properly. I suppose it is still work
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:45:03 +0200, JA Magallón wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I have a problem with this first big change in Cauldron...
> I have a couple test boxes in which I have updated everything, and I can't
> get Gnome 3 to work properly. I suppose it is still work in progress, but as
> other peo
James Kerr a écrit :
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Le 10/06/2011 18:05, Frank Griffin a écrit :
Just updated and rebooted a system which was last rebooted Jun 7, and
both GDM and KDM fail to log into my GNOME DE with a greyish popup
saying "failed to load your GNOME session".
Same error message. Sw
Le 10/06/2011 18:37, Daniel Le Berre a écrit :
Same error message. Switched to icewm to be able to work.
xfce is also a good chose.
But, we want try gnome 3 ;)
--
Amicalement vOOotre Troumad Alias Bernard SIAUD
mon site : http://troumad.org : AD&D maths WEB...
Pour la liberté http
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 10/06/11 16:34 did gyre and
gimble:
If people are using a system with
gnome installed to develop gnome, it's not strange they run into
problems.
I call shenanigans. I do this kind of stuff all the time. It's
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 10/06/11 17:01 did gyre and gimble:
On 10 June 2011 17:56, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:34 +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
If people are using a system with gnome
installed to develop gnome, it's
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:17:10PM +0200, Dexter Morgan wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > >> My main issue is more that not everything i
On 06/10/2011 12:37 PM, Daniel Le Berre wrote:
Got the same problem this morning on a Mageia 1 RC that had not been
updated for two weeks, and that I updated yesterday.
The following GNOME3 packages seem to have gotten installed in spite of
--keep:
gnome-icon-theme
gnome-menus
gnome-s
Op vrijdag 10 juni 2011 18:26:56 schreef Colin Guthrie:
[...]
> I call shenanigans. I do this kind of stuff all the time. It's easy to
> use a custom prefix (i.e. not /usr) if you select the right configure
> options. It means you get a working system but can also develop the next
> version. I've b
On 10.06.2011 02:56, Barry Jackson wrote:
> I have been working on a package to install Skype current stable release
> and now feel that it is ready for submission for approval.
>
> It has already been improved/corrected/adapted many times following
> discussions on #mageia-mentoring where I have
On 10 June 2011 18:24, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 10/06/11 17:01 did gyre and gimble:
>> On 10 June 2011 17:56, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:34 +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
If people are using a system with gnome
installed to deve
On 10 June 2011 13:44, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> 2011/6/10 Michael Scherer :
>>
>> We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
>> change that.
>>
>> If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
>> should fix backports process, not bypassing them.
>>
Le 10/06/2011 18:05, Frank Griffin a écrit :
> Just updated and rebooted a system which was last rebooted Jun 7, and
> both GDM and KDM fail to log into my GNOME DE with a greyish popup
> saying "failed to load your GNOME session".
>
> /var/log/gdm/0.log shows a segfault backtrace in fglrx, but th
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 10/06/11 16:34 did gyre and
gimble:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:35:57PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Christi
On 10.06.2011 17:28, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
> Am 10.06.2011 16:09, schrieb James Kerr:
>> On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
>>> Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
> So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 10/06/11 17:01 did gyre and gimble:
> On 10 June 2011 17:56, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:34 +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>>> If people are using a system with gnome
>>> installed to develop gnome, it's not strange they run into problems.
On 10 June 2011 16:46, James Kerr wrote:
> On 10/06/11 15:27, Oliver Burger wrote:
>>
>> James Kerr schrieb am 10.06.2011
>>>
>>> Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
>>> available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
>>> mgaonline.)
>>
>> I make you p
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > release is obviously frozen so no go there.
> >
> > The only real option is updates, but that should obviously have some QA
> > on it.
>
> Updates is not for new version of software, not for new softwares. And
> backporting something from cauldron
Just updated and rebooted a system which was last rebooted Jun 7, and
both GDM and KDM fail to log into my GNOME DE with a greyish popup
saying "failed to load your GNOME session".
/var/log/gdm/0.log shows a segfault backtrace in fglrx, but this could
be a red herring, since KDE starts fine fo
On 10 June 2011 17:56, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:34 +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
>> If people are using a system with gnome
>> installed to develop gnome, it's not strange they run into problems.
>
> This is nonsense, sorry. It's no stranger than a KDE-user wanting to
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 17:34 +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> If people are using a system with gnome
> installed to develop gnome, it's not strange they run into problems.
This is nonsense, sorry. It's no stranger than a KDE-user wanting to
recompile kwrite or krita.
> And I
> wonder why
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:35:57PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
Seems some distributions misunderstand the need and changed the w
Op vrijdag 10 juni 2011 17:18:54 schreef Michael Scherer:
[...]
> UI wise, I think it would make sense to have that ( even if a idea is
> not sufficient, and we need a patch ) :
>
> User search for a package, he should see the latest recommended version
> ( ie, release/updates ).
>
> If he say "a
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 16:27 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
> James Kerr schrieb am 10.06.2011
> > Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
> > available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
> > mgaonline.)
> I make you parden, but: no!
>
> When a repo
venerdì 10 giugno 2011 alle 14:29, Daniel Kreuter ha scritto:
> To run the educational programs even on new hardware and on old ones, i
> would propose not to choose kde or gnome. XFCE or LXDE would be a better
> choice i think. But it's only my point of view.
That's the idea. I started build a lxd
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:35:57PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> >>>https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/RemovingLaFiles
> >>
> >>"... but the dirty hacks that jhbuild plays ..."
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 13:51 did gyre and gimble:
> Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 11:44 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
>> So the user that just wants to install supybot has to expose themselves
>> to the risk of updating to a backported version of gnome or KDE this
>> is ha
On 10/06/11 15:27, Oliver Burger wrote:
James Kerr schrieb am 10.06.2011
Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
mgaonline.)
I make you parden, but: no!
When a repo is disabled it doesn't get updated auto
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/RemovingLaFiles
"... but the dirty hacks that jhbuild plays ..."
Problems with dirty hacks are NOT a valid reason to remove libtool
convenience libr
Am 10.06.2011 16:09, schrieb James Kerr:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
As I see it,
James Kerr schrieb am 10.06.2011
> Even though backports are disabled rpmdrake can display a list of
> available backports. (The sources are automatically updated by
> mgaonline.)
I make you parden, but: no!
When a repo is disabled it doesn't get updated automatically and its
packages are not to
On 10/06/11 15:09, James Kerr wrote:
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
As I see it, it'
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
> >https://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/RemovingLaFiles
>
> "... but the dirty hacks that jhbuild plays ..."
>
> Problems with dirty hacks are NOT a valid reason to remove libtool
> convenience libraries aka .la files.
Seems you s
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:41:46PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 03:47 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
On 9 June 2011 19:35, Dexter Morgan wrote:
Hello,
as other distributions we started to remove .la files from mageia
during
On 10/06/11 13:54, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updates _if_ we
decide that's the way to go...
As I see it, it's the only user friendly way. Using
Le 2011-06-09 19:56, Barry Jackson a écrit :
I have been working on a package to install Skype current stable release
and now feel that it is ready for submission for approval.
It has already been improved/corrected/adapted many times following
discussions on #mageia-mentoring where I have been
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 15:40 -0400, Lee a écrit :
> I was asked to look into supybot and meetbot to work on patches an
> fixes. First things first I had to rebuild rpms for my mageia 1 system
> (i586). I built the following from src rpms:
>
> supybot-0.83.4.1-1.mga1.noarch.rpm
> supybot-Dcc-0.8
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:17:10PM +0200, Dexter Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> >> My main issue is more that not everything is finished ( like I miss the
> >> timezone clock stuff to see w
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> My main issue is more that not everything is finished ( like I miss the
>> timezone clock stuff to see when to call on USAs and rest of Europa )
>
> That's planned for 3.2 btw
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:59:58PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> My main issue is more that not everything is finished ( like I miss the
> timezone clock stuff to see when to call on USAs and rest of Europa )
That's planned for 3.2 btw.
--
Regards,
Olav
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:12 +0200, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> i will try a new way to remove them and btw we maybe should add a
> rpmlint reject to reject packages with la files inside . but not yet
> as we may need to still build some
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 07:20 -0400, Frank Griffin a écrit :
> On 06/10/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
> > people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
> > So maybe we could start to learn
hi,
perl 5.14.0 should arrive soon. it compiles fine on both i586 & x86_64,
and it seem we fixed the only problem arisen in perl-URPM.
since other packages need to be rebuilt in the same loop, and given that
urpmi is written in perl, it needs a special treatment to bypass the
regular bs upload.
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 14:21 +0200, Oliver Burger a écrit :
> Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
> > So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updates _if_ we
> > decide that's the way to go...
> As I see it, it's the only user friendly way. Using backports is fine
> for experienced
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 11:44 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
> 'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 11:27 did gyre and gimble:
> > Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:14 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
> >> t
On 2011.06.10, at 14:16, Frank Griffin wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 07:44 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>> maybe 1 wait to have gnome 3 and then speak about gnome2
>
> Could you post here when all of the GNOME3 packages are in Cauldron ?
And perhaps build a task-gnome rpm, so we can get all the dependenci
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Angelo Naselli wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
> > I think is a good task and I will help Angelo.
> Thanks.
>
> > First we need to discuss if develop under KDE or also Gnome (2), taking
> into
> > consideration also the old hardware on which usually it's installed.
> Well I
Thomas Backlund schrieb am 10.06.2011
> So the path would then be */updates_testing -> */updates _if_ we
> decide that's the way to go...
As I see it, it's the only user friendly way. Using backports is fine
for experienced users who do know what to install from backports or
who are capable of f
On 06/10/2011 07:39 AM, Kira wrote:
> In the past time, there's KDE3 and KDE4 co-exist together in the
> repository,
>
> maybe we can do it again?
>
Good idea. I'm not much of a KDE user, but I noticed that the DMs
offered both KDE3 and 4, which seems like a very easy way to switch back
and forth
On 06/10/2011 07:44 AM, Dexter Morgan wrote:
maybe 1 wait to have gnome 3 and then speak about gnome2
Could you post here when all of the GNOME3 packages are in Cauldron ?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:41:46PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 03:47 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
>> > On 9 June 2011 19:35, Dexter Morgan wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > as other distributions we started to
Wolfgang Bornath skrev 10.6.2011 14:44:
2011/6/10 Michael Scherer:
We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
change that.
If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
should fix backports process, not bypassing them.
And if we start by pushing
2011/6/10 Michael Scherer :
> Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:49 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
>> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble:
>> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón :
>> >>
>> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had
>> >> heard on other t
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:41:46PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 03:47 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
> > On 9 June 2011 19:35, Dexter Morgan wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > as other distributions we started to remove .la files from mageia
> > > during mageia 1 developme
2011/6/10 Michael Scherer :
>
> We have used backports in the past for that, and I see no reason to
> change that.
>
> If the problem is that backports were too buggy in the past, then we
> should fix backports process, not bypassing them.
>
> And if we start by pushing new version in update, peopl
2011/6/10 Kira :
> 在 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:20:41 +0800, Frank Griffin 寫道:
>
>> On 06/10/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
>>>
>>> While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
>>> people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
>>> So maybe we could
在 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:20:41 +0800, Frank Griffin 寫道:
On 06/10/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
So maybe we could start to learn from the past and dis
On 06/10/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
So maybe we could start to learn from the past and discuss with users to
explain the update, see why they do
[Didn't finish this sentence]
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 10/06/11 11:44 did gyre and gimble:
> I don't think this is particularly relevant. Backports are unsupported
> generally. That's a given. If we encourage people to enable backports to
> get missing packages (this is very distinct an
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:49 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble:
> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón :
> >>
> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had
> >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was b
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 11:27 did gyre and gimble:
> Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:14 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
>> that many) I'm running into a few packages that are missing (this is
>> inevi
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 03:47 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
> On 9 June 2011 19:35, Dexter Morgan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as other distributions we started to remove .la files from mageia
> > during mageia 1 development.
Could you explain the rational of removing them ?
AFAIK, the .la remova
venerdì 10 giugno 2011 alle 11:44, Pierre Jarillon ha scritto:
> Le jeudi 9 juin 2011 23:28:45, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
> > i'd like to add an item to mageia 2 specification, e.g.
> > improving the educational part. (Already added into wiki)
>
> Do you know http://www.abuledu.org/en/accueil ?
> T
'Twas brillig, and Michael Scherer at 10/06/11 11:29 did gyre and gimble:
> Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 09:56 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
>> 'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
>
>>> But if new package can go directly to updates.. that doesn't look
>>> right to
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 à 09:56 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
> 'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
> > But if new package can go directly to updates.. that doesn't look
> > right to me, because at which point will "new" packages stop going to
> > a stable relea
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:14 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As I upgrade my various machines (I only really have about 5, so not
> that many) I'm running into a few packages that are missing (this is
> inevitable).
>
> Nothing major just little things like trac and supybot etc.
>
> Wh
Le vendredi 10 juin 2011 10:56:35, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
> 'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
> > On 9 June 2011 14:22, Oliver Burger wrote:
> >> Dexter Morgan schrieb am 09.06.2011
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie
> >>>
> >>> wrot
Le jeudi 9 juin 2011 23:28:45, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
> i'd like to add an item to mageia 2 specification, e.g.
> improving the educational part. (Already added into wiki)
Do you know http://www.abuledu.org/en/accueil ?
This is a free/libre project created in 1999 and very dynamic.
Ryxeo offers
'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 09/06/11 17:42 did gyre and gimble:
> On 9 June 2011 14:22, Oliver Burger wrote:
>> Dexter Morgan schrieb am 09.06.2011
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Colin Guthrie
>>> wrote:
>>
I think updates would be the right place.
>>
>>>
>>
>>> Please no 3rd
venerdì 10 giugno 2011 alle 10:26, Oliver Burger ha scritto:
> Last year at some German linux event I was talking with a guy from
> Seminarix, a project providing a Sidux/Aptosid based distro for
> teachers-to-be.
> So we could take their software collection as an example and look
> what's left
Dexter Morgan schrieb am 10.06.2011
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Angelo Naselli
wrote:
> >> WDYT?
> >
> > I'd add that this task could be a good start for padawans, well i
> > could try to mentor someone here :) ... easier if we're going to
> > be a team in this task (if dmorgan agrees a
Hi Stefano,
> I think is a good task and I will help Angelo.
Thanks.
> First we need to discuss if develop under KDE or also Gnome (2), taking into
> consideration also the old hardware on which usually it's installed.
Well I know you and probably what you mean... but it's really hard to
understa
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Angelo Naselli wrote:
>> WDYT?
>
> I'd add that this task could be a good start for padawans, well i could
> try to mentor someone here :) ... easier if we're going to be a team
> in this task (if dmorgan agrees and joins me/us :p )
Yes of course :)
> WDYT?
I'd add that this task could be a good start for padawans, well i could
try to mentor someone here :) ... easier if we're going to be a team
in this task (if dmorgan agrees and joins me/us :p )
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:23:23 +0300, Ahmad Samir wrote about Re:
[Mageia-dev] [RPM] cauldron core/release gecko-mediaplayer-1.0.3-1.mga2:
>gecko-mediaplayer requires a newer gnome-mplayer
>http://code.google.com/p/gecko-mediaplayer/issues/detail?id=131
>
>gnome-mplayer-1.0.3 should be on the mirror
81 matches
Mail list logo
