> From: Axel Beckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Announce] Critical security update for Mailman 2.1.5
> and earlier
> To: mailman-developers@python.org
>
> I just want to share my experiences with the patch:
>
> Am Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:41:05AM -0500, Barry Warsaw schrieb:
>
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:32:58 -0800, Chuq Von Rospach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I think its safe to say that it's not lack of interest or intent here
> with any of us, but a lack of free time. And time, of course is one
> commodity you can't do much about some times.
Ditto. My daughter ju
On Feb 16, 2005, at 8:45 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:
I try to do all the little things I can, so that Barry and the core
developers can focus their attention on the big things that I have no
hope of ever being able to touch. For the most part, I try to follow
the lead of people like Barry, Chuq,
Adrian Bye wrote:
>
>Yesterday I contributed patches which enables Mailman to have this exact
>functionality which we borrowed from Yahoo Groups. Yet I've seen no response
>from you yet, and only one half dismissive response from another mailman
>developer.
Since mine was to only reply to your po
I encourage everyone who wants to help speed Mailman3 progress to join
us at Pycon 2005 for a Mailman 3 sprint. Here's the sprint page:
http://www.python.org/moin/Mailman3Sprint
If you're coming, please add your name to the list. I think we can make
some significant progress if we get enough pe
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:42, Kevin McCann wrote:
> BARRY: would now be a good time to re-energize discussions on the MM3
> development list? What is your time like? And are there any plans for a
> MM3 sprint? I can send people.
Yes, let's start things back up on mailman3-dev. I definitely pla
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:24, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
> Maybe open up the code to a few more commiters would help? But, I
> don't get the impression there's much interest in letting others
> have a crack at it.
I agree that I am going to have to open the project up to more
committers if Mailman 3
At 8:13 AM -0800 2005-02-16, JC Dill wrote:
I don't know what Brad's key focus is on this list, but I can share with
you that *I* am not a developer in that I don't write code.
I'm not a developer, either. I can do a little bit of hacking
together scripts, but that's about it.
At 11:28 AM -0400 2005-02-16, Adrian Bye wrote:
We've previously had conversations about some Yahoo groups
functionality which
you said wasn't possible:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.039.htp
Indeed, we have.
Yesterday I contributed patches which enables Mail
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:13, JC Dill wrote:
> Right now, I would suggest being patient. I suggest you give it a week
> for Barry and the other key developers to to find the time to start
> looking at new code after they dig out from their present schedule
> overload caused by the recent securi
Tobias Eigen wrote:
What I envision having in my Mailman/Mambo system is a single user
database with one password per username for all services. Users can
then go to a simple preferences page on Mambo and do basic things
like change their email address or password, tick a box to opt in/out
of
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 08:54, Tobias Eigen wrote:
> It's really weird to have to log in
> multiple times to access multiple list settings, especially if it's the
> same password being used everywhere. It's likewise weird to then be
> able to make "global" changes from one list's preferences page
"Adrian Bye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mailman CAN be as good - and better - than Yahoo Groups. It
> doesn't have to take lots of money and resources. Just being
> willing to accept our code a piece at a time, and encouraging
> those who contribute will go a long way towards getting there.
Adrian Bye wrote:
If someone wanted to pay large sums of money to make an
open source Yahoo! Groups-beating package, and pay people to
work on that as their full-time job, we might be able to
change this situation -- in time.
We've previously had conversations about some Yahoo groups functiona
> All I can say is that Mailman is a non-profit open
> source project, run by a group of people in whatever spare
> time they can manage to scrape together.
>
> The Linux folks haven't cracked the ease-of-use aspects
> of their OS compared to Microsoft, not even for the companies
>
At 8:54 AM -0500 2005-02-16, Tobias Eigen wrote:
I know all this - and I know you know it, and I know all Mailman geeks
like us get it. The problem is with regular, every day people who are
expecting (and really can be expected to expect) Yahoogroups type
interfaces.
All I can say is that Mail
Hi Brad -
Sorry for sitting on this for so long - would like to respond to it
though.. see below.
And this, plus the CAN prefix to the patch name, reminds me: correct
me
if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that Mailman as it exists does
not comply with the new (unfortunately named) CAN SPAM
17 matches
Mail list logo
