On 10/11/2015 7:31 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 10/11/2015 03:05 PM, John Swartzentruber wrote:
Until this morning I've had mailman working fine for me (for many years
and over one year with my current server, which is running CentOS 6).
Basically one small list that is active daily and
Hi,
I've been off this list for a few years, but suddenly today I've run
into a problem and I'm stumped. I suspect it might be a postfix problem,
not a mailman problem, but I'm not really sure and I'm hoping someone
here can give me some pointers.
Until this morning I've had mailman working
It appears that the mailman lists have disappeared from GMane. That's a
bit inconvenient. Are there any other newsgroups that mirror this
mailing list? I looked around some, but didn't see any. In the meantime,
I've re-enabled email delivery, but that's not nearly as convenient as
using newsgro
On 1/16/2006 6:21 PM Scriber, Brian wrote:
> I have completed the installation and everything seems to be working
> perfectly... except being able to access the archives for my lists.
>
> I have searched the archives and it seems like many people have had this
> problem in the past, but the soluti
On 1/15/2006 9:44 PM Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
> John Swartzentruber wrote:
>> I recently upgraded to Mailman 2.1.7. A user (and co-moderator) on one
>> of the lists that I run reported that some of his messages were missing
>> from the archives and that one of them had been del
I recently upgraded to Mailman 2.1.7. A user (and co-moderator) on one
of the lists that I run reported that some of his messages were missing
from the archives and that one of them had been delivered to him without
the normal Mailman footers and subject modification.
I looked into it today a
On 6/22/2005 11:36 AM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings. I didn't see this in the FAQ, although I'm surprised it
> isn't more frequently asked. Under 2.1.5, is there a way to see the
> whole list of users at once, instead of by first letter of their
> name? If not, is there a way of telling the ad
On 4/29/2005 5:54 PM John Swartzentruber wrote:
I'm running 2.1.6rc2. For the first time yesterday, I started getting
cron errors and messages getting shunted. The cron errors and the
shunting errors appear to be the same. When I run bin/unshunt, the
following shows up in my error log:
A
I'm running 2.1.6rc2. For the first time yesterday, I started getting
cron errors and messages getting shunted. The cron errors and the
shunting errors appear to be the same. When I run bin/unshunt, the
following shows up in my error log:
Apr 29 17:44:04 2005 (30197) SHUNTING:
1114627404.71066
On 3/10/2005 8:23 PM Mark Sapiro wrote:
John Swartzentruber wrote:
When one user on one of my lists replies to list messages, they get sent
to the bounce address and show up as uncaught bounces. I understand why
this is happening, so that itself isn't my question. In the latest
instance,
When one user on one of my lists replies to list messages, they get sent
to the bounce address and show up as uncaught bounces. I understand why
this is happening, so that itself isn't my question. In the latest
instance, this user also CC'ed the correct list address. It looks like
the message
On 2/10/2005 11:03 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pyc will only get remade when needed and since this only affects lists
with archives, try going to some list of yours with an archive.
Thank you (and to Dan Phillips who replied privately). When I accessed a
private archive the .pyc file was remad
On 2/10/2005 9:41 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
Until Mailman 2.1.6 is released, the longer term fix is to apply this
patch:
http://www.list.org/CAN-2005-0202.txt
Could an expert please help out a non-expert? I applied this patch to
/usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Cgi, and the private.py file was correctly
pa
On 9/30/2004 9:21 AM Brad Knowles wrote:
At 8:53 AM +0200 2004-09-30, martin f krafft wrote:
However, the attachment is still delivered to all 80+ subscribers.
I wonder if it's possible to replace the attachment in the email
with a link to the file saved under /attachments/... of the list
archi
On 6/4/2004 7:14 PM Chris Whip wrote:
Hello, mailpersons.
There is a bug in Mailman and/or Lynx regarding Hotmail/MSN rich text emails.
(My setup: Mailman 2.1.5, Lynx version 2.8.4rel.1 (RH7.2, Sendmail 8.12.10))
Replication instructions (that require only a telnet client) are included below.
The H
There is a user on one of my mailing lists that bounces all of the
mailing list messages. This started less than a week ago.
First question: is it possible to see the actual bounce messages before
the user's subscription is disabled? When mailman notified me that his
address was disabled, it in
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:58:05 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
>> > Do we *really* need this "feature" on the mailman-users list? Does
>> > anyone actually find it helpful?
>
>I'd like to assume (perhaps wrongly) that most people on *this* list can
>figure out what address a message was sent to by looking
On 22 Mar 2003 09:44:16 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>I've made some updates to genaliases so that Manual should be more
>useful. You can now give it a -q/--quiet flag to supppress the
>non-alias instructions. You would run it like this:
>
>% bin/genaliases -q > /etc/aliases-mailman
>% newaliases
On 21 Mar 2003 16:55:25 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 16:28, Jon Carnes wrote:
>> ~mailman/bin/genaliases in mentioned in:
>> NEWS
>> UPGRADING
>> README.POSTFIX
>>
>> Sorry, it looks like the genaliases script is designed specifically to
>> be used with Postfix... Hmmm.
On 27 Jan 2003 09:43:39 -0500, Jon Carnes wrote:
>What version of Mailman are you running? If version 2.1 then you can
>run ~mailman/bin/genaliases and that will create ~mailman/data/aliases
>which contains all the aliases needed for your existing Mailman lists
>(creation of new lists will also b
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:14:12 -0500, John Swartzentruber wrote:
>I looked at Defaults.py and saw DEFAULT_ADMIN_MEMBER_CHUNKSIZE, which
>seems to be the value that I would want to change. I added this line to
>my mm_cfg.py file:
>
>DEFAULT_ADMIN_MEMBER_CHUNKSIZE = 70
>
>but it
In 2.0, the entire membership list was displayed. In 2.1, it looks like
it will only show the list for each letter of the alphabet. For
example, my one list has 42 members and it is difficult to see more
than one or two members at a time now.
I looked at Defaults.py and saw DEFAULT_ADMIN_MEMBER_CH
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 07:59:01 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>Go to Non-Digest Options -> personalize and read the details.
It would be helpful if these personalized footer fields were also
listed in the "Details for msg_footer". Or at least a mention that they
are listed in the "Details for persona
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:09:15 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
>
>>>>>> "JS" == John Swartzentruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>JS> 1. When I go to the private archive for a list at
>JS> http://mcs
I just installed Mailman 2.1 this morning. I'm discovering a couple
problems and I'm not sure if they are mine or mailman's.
1. When I go to the private archive for a list at
http://mcswartz.org.swartz/mailman/private/listname, I see the usual
possibilities. Unfortunately the links do not work. Fo
25 matches
Mail list logo
