Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem moving 2.0 list to 2.1.5 [SOLVED]

Mark Sapiro wrote: > bin/update converts data files, qfiles, list data, etc. as necessary to > bring them from an older format to that of the current Mailman. If you > have an installation and you upgrade the Mailman software, the update > is run automatically as part of the upgrade. However, if

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem moving 2.0 list to 2.1.5 [SOLVED]

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > >On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > >> Did you run bin/update after moving the list directory? > > > >It wasn't clear from the UPGRADING readme that that step was necessary. > >bin/update seems like it will update Mai

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem moving 2.0 list to 2.1.5 [SOLVED]

Matthew Saltzman wrote: >On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Did you run bin/update after moving the list directory? > >It wasn't clear from the UPGRADING readme that that step was necessary. >bin/update seems like it will update Mailman itself (which may not be >desirable). Is it necess

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem moving 2.0 list to 2.1.5 [SOLVED]

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > >I am trying to move lists between servers and upgrade from 2.0.x to 2.1.5, > >and it's not working. > > > >I was able to recreate the archives with cleanarch and arch. Then I move > >the lists/mylist directory to the new serve

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem moving 2.0 list to 2.1.5

Matthew Saltzman wrote: >I am trying to move lists between servers and upgrade from 2.0.x to 2.1.5, >and it's not working. > >I was able to recreate the archives with cleanarch and arch. Then I move >the lists/mylist directory to the new server and run withlist -l -r >fix_url mylist. Then I see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

> Since you're working with a Debian package, you're probably better off > seeking help from Debian resources. Checkperms were ok indeed, so I'll head off to the Debian resources. Cheers, Brenno. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter wrote: > >Thanks for the pointer. I worked through it all, which I didn't solve >the issue and everything seemed normal. There is one thing different: >there is no user mailman. But that may be due to a difference between >RedHat and Debian. Renewed testing learned me th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

Hi Mark, Thanks for the pointer. I worked through it all, which I didn't solve the issue and everything seemed normal. There is one thing different: there is no user mailman. But that may be due to a difference between RedHat and Debian. Renewed testing learned me that there is really no logging d

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winterwrote: > >I have a new server with mailman installed on it. When testing the >MailMan-functionality I have the strangest thing. When I sent a mail to >the test list, it is delivered to the wrapper (according to the log). >But after that the e-mail seems to be archived in

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Micrososft Exchange 2003 SBS

> "Jan" == Jan Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jan> If this customer send a mail to two lists in to:-field, [...] Jan> The problem is, that the M$-server deletes one mail because Jan> they have the same rcpt and message-id. If they have the same Message-ID, they're the same

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Micrososft Exchange 2003 SBS

Jan Kellermann wrote: > >> >We are providing over 200 lists and have no problems at all. >> >But this customers is sure, that this is a mailman-bug. I need support to >> >argumentate. Is here anybody who is working with M$-exchange? Or is here >> >anybody who can proof, that it should be no problem

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Micrososft Exchange 2003 SBS

Hello Mark! > >We are providing over 200 lists and have no problems at all. > >But this customers is sure, that this is a mailman-bug. I need support to > >argumentate. Is here anybody who is working with M$-exchange? Or is here > >anybody who can proof, that it should be no problem to have 2 mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Micrososft Exchange 2003 SBS

Jan Kellermann wrote: > >We are providing over 200 lists and have no problems at all. >But this customers is sure, that this is a mailman-bug. I need support to >argumentate. Is here anybody who is working with M$-exchange? Or is here >anybody who can proof, that it should be no problem to have 2 m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with incorrect link to archives: It linksto someone elses site!!

Chanchao wrote: > >I'm not quite sure if this is a know bug or a configuration issue >somewhere.. Problem is that the "Go to list archives" link points to a >completely different site that I've never heard of. Note that this happens >no matter how I set the archiving settings (archiving on or off,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with https:// admin interface URL

On 8/27/2004 5:31, "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's not that simple. SOME of the things you can put into mm_cfg.py apply >> only to new lists. > > You mean NOT only? That's exactly what makes it so confusing, the overall > changes which apply to all lists change immediately, the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with https:// admin interface URL

John W. Baxter wrote on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:14:15 -0700: > It's not that simple. SOME of the things you can put into mm_cfg.py apply > only to new lists. You mean NOT only? That's exactly what makes it so confusing, the overall changes which apply to all lists change immediately, the others don

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archives

Adam The --wipe command did the trick Thanks for the help Jared --- Adam Steer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If check_perms works fine, then look at permissions > where your mbox > files live. > > If they're all good, then try using the '--wipe' > option when rebuilding > archives: > > /[path

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with https:// admin interface URL

On 8/26/2004 15:32, "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it's there, sorry for the unnecessary question. It wasn't quite clear > to me that mm_cfg.py changes are only for new lists. I suggest adding > something about that to the comments in mm_cfg.py. It's not that simple. SOME of th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with https:// admin interface URL

Mark Sapiro wrote on Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:11:29 -0700: > Did the lists exist when you set up mm_cfg.py? Yes, I always create mailman as the first list, usually I don't log in, but make my changes to mm_cgf.py and then add other lists from a template. I suppose that's why I never noticed the http

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with https:// admin interface URL

Kai Schaetzl wrote: >We use only https:// for web interface access and in the past I changed >the URL_PATTERN in mm_cfg.py and everything was fine. That worked until >2.1.5 RC1. Now I have set up a fresh 2.1.5 on a new machine and can't make >it to work there. Either I overlook something very o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archives

If check_perms works fine, then look at permissions where your mbox files live. If they're all good, then try using the '--wipe' option when rebuilding archives: /[path.to]/mailman/bin/arch --wipe [list] /[path.to]/mailman/archives/private/[list].mbox/[list].mbox ...a bit of a clean up before r

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archives

Jared Nyland wrote: >In trouble shooting this issue a little bit more. It >looks like the lists that I had to move from one >server to another the archives are not working >correctly. If I create a new list on the new server >everything seems to work just fine. > >Is there a step I forgot when mi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archives

In trouble shooting this issue a little bit more. It looks like the lists that I had to move from one server to another the archives are not working correctly. If I create a new list on the new server everything seems to work just fine. Is there a step I forgot when migrating lists over to a new

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archives

Jared Nyland wrote: > >I am having troubles with the archives displaying for >the month of August. When I run arch in the bin >directory everything shows up working great. Do I >need to setup a cron job to do this for me or should >this automatically work by default. > bin/arch is only intended

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem getting mailman working with courier + LDAP

At 1:01 PM -0400 2004-08-12, Russell Premont wrote: The issue I am having is that all mail that gets sent to any of the mail list addresses gets deferred. If I go to the web interface and subscribe there it works fine. I get the request sent to me but I cannot respond via email or it get

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with AOL mail

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >SENT E-MAIL WITH FILE ATTACHED BUT IT NEVER GOES THROUGH WHAT CAN I DO If what you are saying (and I'm really guessing here) is that you are trying to post a message with an attached file from your AOL account to a Mailman list and the attachment never comes through the

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with Digest options

At 7:30 AM -0400 2004-07-27, Joseph Cain wrote: However, it was not sent out to the Digest mailing list until I triggered its so doing manually. However,in the Digest options I have the item checked for it to send out the digest daily even if the messages do not meet the limit. Did you set

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with Digest options

I had this same problem on a cPanel server. Turned out to be the mailman cron job was disappearing... was traced to a problem in a cPanel update script. Not sure if you are running cPanel or not. If you are, you should upgrade cPanel, as this problem has been fixed for about a month or so. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:31 am +0200 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 10:09 AM +0100 2004-07-22, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: I haven't tested this, but you should be able to use something like this. Copy everything between the ---snip--- lines, including the blank lines, but NOT t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

At 10:09 AM +0100 2004-07-22, Ian A B Eiloart wrote: I haven't tested this, but you should be able to use something like this. Copy everything between the ---snip--- lines, including the blank lines, but NOT the snip lines themselves. The problem with telling people to copy something exactly is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

--On Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:22 am +0200 Ronny Raschkowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. Could you provid me an exact dummy mail how it would look? I fear i'd do sth wrong., so i would like to see an example. I haven't tested this, but you should be able to use something like this. Copy every

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

Ronny Raschkowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mark Sapiro wrote: > >>Ronny Raschkowan wrote: >> >> >>>This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back. >>> >>> >>> >> >>If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the >>old numbers, you could always add 3633

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

Mark Sapiro wrote: Ronny Raschkowan wrote: This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back. If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the old numbers, you could always add 3633 dummy messages to the beginning of the .mbox file and then bin/arch --wip

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

Ronny Raschkowan wrote: > >This is really strange.. But I need the normal numeration back. > If I understand correctly that the new numbers are 3363 less than the old numbers, you could always add 3633 dummy messages to the beginning of the .mbox file and then bin/arch --wipe [listname] I thin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

Mark Sapiro wrote: Ronny Raschkowan wrote: I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i did, providing "bin/arch mylist []. It seems f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after bin/arch'ing

Ronny Raschkowan wrote: > >I needed do edit a message of an archive today, so i did the change, and >saved it. Later, i had to run the bin/arch script to regenerate the >archive of the list i had to edit a message. Thats what i did, providing >"bin/arch mylist []. It seems from what you say lat

RE: [Mailman-Users] Problem with JapaneseCodecs-1.4.10; unable to execute gcc: No suc h file or directory

imon. -Original Message- From: Jim Tittsler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 9 juli 2004 8:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with JapaneseCodecs-1.4.10; unable to execute gcc: No suc h file or directory On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:39:34AM +0200, Kraa de Si

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with JapaneseCodecs-1.4.10; unable to execute gcc: No suc h file or directory

On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:39:34AM +0200, Kraa de Simon wrote: > I don't have gcc installed (and I cannot install gcc on this system). > > Is there a way I can work around this problem? configure's '--without-gcc' switch doesn't set the compiler for the setup.py steps. You could just change into

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with email addresses in new mailman setup

At 11:43 AM -0700 2004-06-19, Charles 'Buck' Krasic wrote: Things seem to be basically working, I can subscribe to my lists, make postings, etc. The problem is that I'm seeing an unexpected host name in some of the e-mail messages. I'm seeing 'ns.qstream.org' where I expect to see 'lists.qs

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with mailman

At 4:43 PM +0200 2004-06-14, zakaria\.chaanani wrote: When i reboot the pc, it appears this error message : ==>" Starting mailman qrunnerSite list is missing : mailman[EHEC]" See . -- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem accessing membership management

On May 19, 2004, at 01:28, Con Wieland wrote: While running 2.1.4 I get the following when trying to access the Membership Management module from the admin page. This only happens on one list on a server with ~400 lists. [...] all = [_m.encode() for _m in mlist.getMembers()] UnicodeDecodeErro

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with subscription parsing?

Brad Knowles wrote on Sun, 2 May 2004 03:08:13 +0200: > You need to turn off quoted-printable within your mail program, > and use plain 7-bit ASCII. > As a side note, he possibly wants to enable 8bit, because he's French. If that client is Outlook (Express) that means: choose *no* encoding for

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with subscription parsing?

At 10:27 PM +0200 2004/04/30, David Bourguignon wrote: I have a problem to register to mailing lists managed with gnu mailman. I think it comes from the way my free email provider writes the subject line content but I'm not sure. No, the problem is that your MUA is encoding the message in 8-bi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with news gateway

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > and it doesn't find new ones. It looks as if I need to specify > the logon for the news server. There isn't anywhere to do > this, though and I can't find the configuration files - one > posting talks of *.pf config files that contain the news set > up. > > Is there a de

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem accessing mailman web pages after switching server

On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 16:20, Thomas Waters wrote: > We set up Mailman on Panther Server 10.3.3. It had an IP and hostname > for our dev server. Once everything was configured, etc, I switched > the IP and name to be our mail server. Mailman is working in terms of > sending out mail to the va

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem accessing mailman web pages after switching server

On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 16:20:17 -0500 Thomas Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :Mailman is working in terms of :sending out mail to the various lists, but I can not access the web :pages to admin any of the lists! This sounds like a problem which I was able to fix by running: bin/withlist -l -r fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with domain name

On 19 Feb 2004, at 16:48, Yves Dorfsman wrote: Hi, I am trying to setup mailman for an organisation that has a three piece domain name, say A.B.org. In mm_cfg.py, I put: DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'http://%s/something/' DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mailserver.A.B.org' add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAUL

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with domain name

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Simon White wrote: > 19-Feb-04 at 09:48, Yves Dorfsman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > I am trying to setup mailman for an organisation that has a three piece > > domain name, say A.B.org. > > > > When I go on the web to www.A.B.org/something/listinfo, right at the top > > i

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with domain name

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:48:00AM -0700, Yves Dorfsman wrote: > > Hi, > > I am trying to setup mailman for an organisation that has a three piece > domain name, say A.B.org. > > In mm_cfg.py, I put: > DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'http://%s/something/' > DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mailserver.A.B.org' > add

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with domain name

19-Feb-04 at 09:48, Yves Dorfsman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I am trying to setup mailman for an organisation that has a three piece > domain name, say A.B.org. > > In mm_cfg.py, I put: > DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'http://%s/something/' > DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mailserver.A.B.org' > add_virtualhost(

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with cron script

On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 08:22, christian wrote: > Hi @all > > I installed mailman 2.1.4 out from the source on my suse 8.1 system. > Everything is working fine except one of the cron scripts, every minute > I get a mail with the following content > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem getting mailman to run on RH9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sysadmin wrote: > I am trying to get mailman working with RedHat 9. I installed the RPM from > using yum and it installed version mailman 3:2.1.1-4.i386. I see where it > is installed at /var/mailman. When I try to start it up, I get this error: > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem With Mailman and OS X

Hi Richard, I had the same problem. I had to re-install the server, but at the time I had a blank server so I wasn't bothered. Once I had a server working I still had problems and so had to fault find a bit. I did the following. The permission check (Apples) is showing lots of corrections.

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with bounces

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 jose florido wrote: > Hello, I'm new at administering a mailman list and I'm having > problems with bounces. [...] > I enclose below the error email I'm receiving: [...] > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A > message t

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem installing tk8.3.2

kacham ashok said: > > Dear friends.. > i am a new member of this mailing list... > i was unable to install tk8.3.2 on my system(redhat > linux 9.0).. while running 'make process i am getting > errors like this > What does TK have to do with Mailman? Or did you post to the wrong list by accident

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem installing tk8.3.2

:: please suggest me a solution Find a better list to post this to. -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with ./configure to install Mailman

04-Dec-03 at 10:09, Brent Shafer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I'm just starting out with Mailman and have limited experience with > Linux. > When I attempt to configure the Mailman installation, I get the > following message: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailman]$ cd mailman-2.1.3 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with mailman + postfix

25-Nov-03 at 23:36, Ruben Navarro Huedo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hello friends: > We are having some problems with Postfix + mailman. > We have installed sasl with postfix. > The problem is that postfix doesn't allow relay to postfix. > > Have a look at the logs: > > Nov 25 23:15:03 linux po

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with localhost.localdomain

Sasa, Check the output when running ./configure, looking for "checking for default mail host name" and "checking for default URL host component" - on my system, they gave me the resolved hostname for my dynamic IP address (blah.client.attbi.com) instead of my domain. It was using the attbi add

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Swedish characters

At 11:27 PM +0100 2003/11/12, Rickard Andersson wrote: For example: "sm örgå sbord" should be "smörgåsbord". It only occurs in the subject line, not in the mail. Sounds like your MUA is not properly formatting the subject line of the message in accordance to the MIME standards, specifically wi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

Scott Further to my earlier post on this topic, I have taken a look at the pipermail archiver code. I concluded that there is a bug (or is it a feature?) which bloats the size of the -article file in the pipermail "database" for each list. This bloat will affect archiving performance, parti

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

At 12:52 AM + 2003/11/01, Richard Barrett wrote: Rather than just theorize, feel free to make specific suggestions about the deficiencies and appropriate remedies based on the code being executed. Dare I say it, you could even submit a patch to fix any obvious errors in the code. I have s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

At 9:29 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: If we were talking about more than 10,000 files, I might buy it. But we are talking about 1300 files. Many filesystems start significantly slowing down around 1,000 files, not 10,000. Moreover, are you sure that this is the largest number of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 21:29, Scott Lambert wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > > At 6:21 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: > > > I haven't looked at the code yet, and probably won't (ENOTIME), but > > > it almost sounds to me like it's not pruning it's l

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 6:21 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: > > I haven't looked at the code yet, and probably won't (ENOTIME), but > > it almost sounds to me like it's not pruning it's list of handled > > messages and has to walk all of them ea

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 11:59 pm, Brad Knowles wrote: At 6:21 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: I haven't looked at the code yet, and probably won't (ENOTIME), but it almost sounds to me like it's not pruning it's list of handled messages and has to walk all of them each t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

At 6:21 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: I haven't looked at the code yet, and probably won't (ENOTIME), but it almost sounds to me like it's not pruning it's list of handled messages and has to walk all of them each time. I would have expected queue handling to get faster as the que

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:52:34PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote: > Once I kill off the mailman queue runners and clean up the several lock > files for this mailing list, it runs just fine and manages to empty the > archive queue. Well, the above statement is not entirely accurate. It was working qu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with mailman inserting new lines into Subject: header

On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 14:39, Garey Mills wrote: > Hi - > > I've got Mailman 2.1b2 installed. I have a problem because Mailman > occasionally inserts a newline (x010) after the list name close bracket > and before the subject description in the Subject: header line. It appears > that this hap

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s ofcpu (read faq & archives)

John wrote... > Well you've pegged it. That was a bug in version 2.1.2 which is fixed > in 2.1.3. The patch for 2.1.2 should still be available - you could > probably patch your running system and just leave it at that (an upgrade > will bring the patch in anyway). I am having trouble finding th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 08:52 pm, Scott Lambert wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 09:40:11AM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 09:26, Jay West wrote: I'm using Mailman 2.1.2 on FreeBSD v4.8-Release, built using the port. MTA is sendmail 8.12.8p1 Very frequently I will see the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 09:40:11AM -0500, Jon Carnes wrote: > On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 09:26, Jay West wrote: > > I'm using Mailman 2.1.2 on FreeBSD v4.8-Release, built using the port. MTA > > is sendmail 8.12.8p1 > > > > Very frequently I will see the ArchRunner process using 99+ % of cpu. I have >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

Well you've pegged it. That was a bug in version 2.1.2 which is fixed in 2.1.3. The patch for 2.1.2 should still be available - you could probably patch your running system and just leave it at that (an upgrade will bring the patch in anyway). Good Luck - Jon Carnes On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 09:26,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem whit email host

On Saturday, October 11, 2003, at 11:58 am, Wouter wrote: Helo, I have a problem whit mailman i have it installed form a suse rpm. Now i have a problem whit the host after the email adres. Its not the host of my box. So i need to change this. I have in mm_cfg.py: #DEFAULT_NNTP_HOST = 'localho

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem after python upgrade

On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 12:01, Jerry Spaulding wrote: > I upgraded python to version 2.2.2. Now, for _every_ message that hits any > of our lists, we get an entry in the error file of something like: > Oct 03 11:48:00 2003 (712) lost data files for filebase: > 1065106187.152128+c53e6c32d2697be42fa4

RE: [Mailman-Users] Problem creating a new List

Hi, I did some more work on this problem. The problem is coming because the file names cant have characters '<' & '>' on windows. As a hack I did the following. I searched for "" and changed line no 60 in MailList.py from os.path.join(mm_cfg.LOCK_DIR, name or '') + '.lock', To os.path.join(mm_cfg.

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with disappearing mail to some lists

hi i've since found a bunch of discarded posts in the 'vette' log. i found a bunch of mails in the archives with ppl having the same or similar issues. unfortunately i couldn't find an actual answer to any of the posts/threads that seems to have yielded possabilities of a fix. if anyone else has

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with first list setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Bowen wrote: > a rookie problem no doubt but here is what happened. i setup a test list, > called the list bob using the 'newlist' script and it asked for the email > of the person running the list I, of course, put in bob. so i received an > emai

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with check perms; THANKS, RICHARD!

bash-2.03# ls -la total 42 drwxrwsr-x 18 mailman mailman 512 Jul 3 12:50 . drwxr-xr-x 10 root other512 Jun 27 13:06 .. drwxrwsr-x 11 root mailman 1536 Jul 2 11:22 Mailman lrwxrwxrwx 1 root mailman 26 Jul 3 12:50 archives -> /dirarcon/mailman/archives drw

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with check perms

At 11:24 03/07/2003, javier wrote: SO:solaris 8, i'm trying to save lists and archives in a network applyant, how can i make symbolic links to those folders?? thankyou bash-2.03# cd /usr/local/mailman/ bash-2.03# ls -la total 42 drwxrwsr-x 18 mailman mailman 512 Jul 3 12:18 . drwxr-xr-x

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem

At 14:31 01/07/2003, John W. M. Stevens wrote: On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:31:31PM +0200, Johannes Posel wrote: > Dear David, > > Am 01.07.2003, um 06:47, gab David A. Cornelson zu Protokoll... > > > I have Mailman 2.1.2 installed on a Debian box. I run Exim and this was > > working fine until a rec

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem

On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:31:31PM +0200, Johannes Posel wrote: > Dear David, > > Am 01.07.2003, um 06:47, gab David A. Cornelson zu Protokoll... > > > I have Mailman 2.1.2 installed on a Debian box. I run Exim and this was > > working fine until a recent upgrade via Apt-Get. > > Exactly the sam

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem

Dear David, Am 01.07.2003, um 06:47, gab David A. Cornelson zu Protokoll... > I have Mailman 2.1.2 installed on a Debian box. I run Exim and this was > working fine until a recent upgrade via Apt-Get. Exactly the same problem here. Any chance to fix it? Cheers, Johannes

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with getting started

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Both wrote: > I have RedHat 9 and Mailman 2.1 (not 2.1.2). When using the RedHat command > > # service mailman start > > I get the following error traceback. > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/var/mailman/bin/mailmanctl", lin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem posting to newsgroup - additional info

On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 03:15:26PM -0700, Mark LaHaie wrote: > Error when submitting more than one email at a time to the maillist - > which has no subscribers - but is configured to post the email to the > newsgroup. Usually, one email gets posted, others get lost. > [...] > Jun 05 14:17:01

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with checkdbs

I found that in some of the lists that I host, people were able to add an e-mail address twice, and also have illegal characters in the email addresses. ie: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hope there will be a fix for this in the next release. BTW, the hex-editor helped to remove the addresses with the illeg

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem after upgrading to 2.1

I think the easiest way to do this is to use a hex editor on the config.pck file for the list and modify the bogus email address so that it matches something simple. Then delete the simple email address. Good Luck - Jon Carnes On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 21:53, Scott R. Every wrote: > ok, so i think i

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem after upgrading to 2.1

ok, so i think i have found the/a problem email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] when i try to delete it i get the following: ./remove_members overtons_html "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" No such member: [EMAIL PROTECTED] any ideas how to delete a bogus email like this? thanks in advance. s --On Wednesday, Febru

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem

First off, I'm not a big fan of Qmail (ask me why if you want to hear Jon rant). That being said, I know it has some automated way of working with Mailman. You may have set this up, but it's not working I've seen a few fixes for this cross the archives so you can do a search there. It may help.

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with message subjects

On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 10:50 am, Stephan Berndts wrote: | -Original Message- | Subject: [botequim] RES: [botequim] RES: [botequim] Início | da fase beta Mailman is not removing the extra [botequim] headers here. Is it getting confused because of the RES: intead of Re: ? No, it's b

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem with message subjects

Hi Dallas, On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:28:06AM -0800, Dallas Bethune wrote: > Has anyone seen this problem before? : Yes. With german lists. > > | -Original Message- > > | Subject: [botequim] RES: [botequim] RES: [botequim] Início > > | da fase beta > Mailman is not removing the extra [bot

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

No, it was not a typo, just an ellipsis :-) I am very careful when it comes to changing things. I read that changes are not to go into Defaults, and I made the changes in mm_cfg.py. I just omitted the gory details :-) (that what I put in mm_cfg.py in the end becomes Defaults). But you are rig

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

Thank you, Todd, for acting so irate ;-) about my bypassing the warnings and setting up sendmail "in the raw" as opposed to going to it via SMTPDirect. I guess I have demonstrated to be truly a newbie but... there is hope for me. I decided to look into the sendmail.cf file, and it turns out that

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

> But, from the point of view of mailman, once the correct > Delivery_Module was specified in Defaults.py, it works fast > as a whistle. That was a typo, right? There is ample warning in the documentation (and, IIRC, in the Defaults.py file itself) that changes go in mm_cfg.py, not in Defaults.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

So, I got this: #telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mafalda.math.indiana.edu ESMTP Sendmail bla bla bla versions Well, let me play with the fun parts :-) Best, elena -- Mailman-Users

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Elena Fraboschi wrote: > ugh, you must be a developer... :-) Not even close. (I don't even play one on TV. :) > My problem was that mailman received all fine, queued all fine, > and never delivered a thing. Obviously my sendmail was running. > When

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Elena Fraboschi wrote: > Thank you, Todd, for acting so irate ;-) about my bypassing the warnings > and setting up sendmail "in the raw" as opposed to going to it via > SMTPDirect. I guess that's like 'tough love.' ;-) > I guess I have demonstrated

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

ugh, you must be a developer... :-) (just in case, here comes another one ;-)) My problem was that mailman received all fine, queued all fine, and never delivered a thing. Obviously my sendmail was running. When I changed DELIVERY_MODULE from SMTPDirect to Sendmail, it worked just fine. Now, I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem solved: it was the MTA

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Elena Fraboschi wrote: > and there I learned that the makers of mailman, in an over-protective > move, commented out "Sendmail" as the Delivery_Module, and put > "SMTPDirect" instead. All that is fine, except that there should > be a warning about thi

Re: [Mailman-Users] problem restarting with stale pid file

Quoting Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This has happened twice as the result of a system crash (loss of power). > Any ideas on making mailman start after a crash even if there's a stale > pidfile? This has happened to me several times as well, but I wasn't going to complain until I updated

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >