Anybody from Cloudmark aware of any issues with their CSI IP Reputation
Remediation Portal form?
I've filled out the form - https://csi.cloudmark.com/en/reset - twice, I
get the message:
*An email has been sent to the email address you provided. Please follow
the instructions in this email to con
Dnia 19.08.2023 o godz. 11:49:34 Jarland Donnell via mailop pisze:
>
> Is "-all" not indeed a policy in SPF, directed by the domain owner?
> I would argue that it is. Especially given that there are options
> there, each one defining how the domain owner wishes SPF failure to
> be treated. I would
Taavi Eomäe via mailop skrev den 2023-08-19 19:13:
On 19/08/2023 13:16, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
if it was hardfails, lets not ignore domain owners, ever
An SPF hardfail isn't sufficient for a reject or mark as spam either
though.
As previously mentioned, DKIM can be and should be suff
On 19/08/2023 13:16, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
if it was hardfails, lets not ignore domain owners, ever
An SPF hardfail isn't sufficient for a reject or mark as spam either though.
As previously mentioned, DKIM can be and should be sufficient. But
there's also the use-case where a trus
Is "-all" not indeed a policy in SPF, directed by the domain owner? I
would argue that it is. Especially given that there are options there,
each one defining how the domain owner wishes SPF failure to be treated.
I would find it odd to say that should ignore domain owners when they
say "-al
> On 19.08.2023 at 12:30 Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
>
> prove it, it just loose dmarc aligment, if it was hardfails, lets not ignore
> domain owners, ever
>
> spf softfails can still pass dkim, hopefully you know this
You don’t have to ignore domain owners as they do not put any kind of po
Hi!
‘ NOTIFICATION | CSS Listing Errors | Today, between 1:20 am UTC & 2:20 am UTC,
a significant number of listings were incorrectly added to the CSS DNSBL. These
listings were purged at approx. 8:30 am UTC. Our engineers are currently
investigating the root cause of the issue. We sincerely ap
John Levine via mailop skrev den 2023-08-18 23:37:
Ah! Even better. We are pretty much on the same page then I expect.
There's a whole lot of perfectly normal sending situations that SPF
can't describe. (They mostly incude the words "relay" or "forward".)
So if you reject on -all you'll aways l
Am 19.08.23 um 10:43 schrieb Pascal HOARAU via mailop:
Hello,
Since this night (French time) a lot of companies are blacklisted by spamhaus,
mostly transactional IPs.
Do you have the same issue and any info ?
Regards,
Pascal
The spamhaus rejections that I see look all justified. Maybe you
FYI
[cid:image002.png@01D9D28D.6E265D50]
De : mailop De la part de Pascal HOARAU via mailop
Envoyé : samedi 19 août 2023 10:44
À : mailop@mailop.org
Objet : [mailop] spamhaus false positive ?
Hello,
Since this night (French time) a lot of companies are blacklisted by spamhaus,
mostly transac
Hello,
Since this night (French time) a lot of companies are blacklisted by spamhaus,
mostly transactional IPs.
Do you have the same issue and any info ?
Regards,
Pascal
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailo
11 matches
Mail list logo
