On 2024-01-17 08:47, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
Just a quick sanity check, are others seeing intermittent failure to
reach iCloud servers? My logs are filled with:
450 Error connecting to 17.57.156.30. Unexpected socket close
I've been having trouble delivering mail to them for at
Hi,
I've just updated my FBL parsing in preparation of using
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9477 and while doing that checked if
Microsofts JMRP could send reports in ARF format instead of attachments
so I could remove any special-case parsing just for Microsoft... But to
my surprise in
en changed.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Dan Malm via mailop
Skickat: den 14 augusti 2023 11:51
Till: mailop@mailop.org
Ämne: Re: [mailop] Abuse AUTH from Microsoft outlook IP space
Could be mobile connections being proxied, yes. But if it was due to not liking
the features (which
.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Dan Malm via mailop
Skickat: den 14 augusti 2023 11:06
Till: mailop@mailop.org; ab...@microsoft.com
Ämne: [mailop] Abuse AUTH from Microsoft outlook IP space
Hi,
Since Friday I'm seeing a rather extreme amount of SMTP AUTH requeusts
from the same IPv6 IP space
On 2023-08-14 11:05, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Dnia 14.08.2023 o godz. 10:42:53 Dan Malm via mailop pisze:
Do you have AUTH turned on on port 25? Why?
Or are they accessing the submission port?
I don't think anything i wrote suggested this was relating port 25...
They're connecting
Hi,
Since Friday I'm seeing a rather extreme amount of SMTP AUTH requeusts
from the same IPv6 IP space that outlook.com uses when sending emails on
behalf of customers that have added an "external" address to sync and
send from to their outlook account. The AUTH uses valid credentials for
On 5/6/23 17:28, H via mailop wrote:
I am new to doing mass mailings to customers and leads - not spam - and am
looking for some introduction how to interpret different types of rejection
messages so we can improve our success rate etc.
Many mailbox providers do at least some things "their
On 3/31/23 21:05, Simon Arlott via mailop wrote:
On 30/03/2023 16:48, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
Now, if you could get EVERYONE to block them for a day, or find some
other way to hit their pocket books, maybe we could see some relief.
Co-ordinate deferring all email from them for a
On 3/22/23 23:32, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
It may be worth noting that pw has a particularly notable position, as
it was one of the earliest demonstrators of how a registry can sabotage
a TLD. They decided to market their "Pro Web" domains by making them
free and returnable for a while when
On 2/2/23 11:12, MRob via mailop wrote:
Hello,
In the past when I had server which got on Microsoft internal blocklist
you could follow the link provided in the reject msg to find a
postmaster form to request de-list after cleanup of problems. I think
the link was on this page
On 2022-11-23 10:39, Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
Blocking the recipient had the effect that we don't accept emails for
them anymore, so anyone sending an email via ImprovMX to one of their
domain will have a 5xx response on the RCPT command.
That was our initial strategy, the default
On 2022-10-25 18:56, Andreas S. Kerber via mailop wrote:
@hotmail.com>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp,
pri=41706, relay=hotmail-com.olc.protection.outlook.com.
[IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7e8a:0:0:0:33], dsn=4.7.500, reply=451 4.7.500 Server busy. Please
try again later from
On 14/09/2022 9:24 pm, Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
Even "spam folder" is a bad idea. If it's spam, reject it with 5XX.
You can never be sure people will look in the spam folder. And if they
do check it, why should it be there in the first place, email could as
well land in inbox, that's
On 2022-07-30 21:07, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
I think in this case we all know what they're doing and you've hit it
dead on. They're targeting Gmail and they're not really interested in
anyone else.
But the only way you can get gmail to "use a filtering algorithm to
apply a label"
On 2022-07-06 13:22, Emil Stahl Pedersen via mailop wrote:
Seems like mails are coming through now. Our queues have been declining
since 10:30 UTC.
Mostly the same here. I still see a few "Temporary server error. Please
try again later ATTR2" errors and also some "ATTR5" ones. But I
Hi,
We're seeing a lot of DNS errors for *.mail.protection.outlook.com at
the moment. NS lookup for mail.protection.outlook.com resolves to two
hostnames that in turn resolve to the same IP. What IP they both
resolves to varies over time, and one or more of those IPs doesn't
respond at all
On 2022-03-02 16:40, Anne Mitchell via mailop wrote:
If a small business (say less than 10 people, hosts their website at their
registrar's free hosting service, or Square or Wix) were to come to you and ask
you from where they should send their one-to-one regular business
correspondence
On 2022-01-03 22:48, Mary via mailop wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is there anyone at Microsoft who can help me understand why my IP is blocked?
In my experience, no there's not.
I've sent emails to del...@messaging.microsoft.com without success.
I've never tried this. Did they respond at all?
On 2021-01-27 13:40, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
> While playing with this I noticed that Thunderbird shows the full header
> field without quotes and replies go to the first address - even though I
> thought that is just the "name/description/comment" part?
Are you sure it's not just that
On 2021-01-07 14:54, Dan Malm via mailop wrote:
> On 2021-01-06 18:36, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
>> Does the above mean that it will fail DKIM keys less than 2048 will
>> fail? That's likely the larger issue.
> That's a good question. I don't handle any < 2048 bit DKIM
On 2021-01-06 20:10, Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
> My thoughts are `time for mail operators to pull their fingers out and
> upgrade`. Because we are really saying `upgrade to something less than
> 8 years old`
I fully agree. The state of TLS in the mail world is quite sad and it
would be great
Hi,
Canonical have decided to have decided to ship Ubuntu with a openssl
binary compiled with the seclevel option set to 2 as default:
"Security level set to 112 bits of security. As a result RSA, DSA and DH
keys shorter than 2048 bits and ECC keys shorter than 224 bits are
prohibited. In
On 2020-12-14 20:48, Mary via mailop wrote:
> no false positives
> - uceprotect.net
>
My take on uceprotect is that they are very happy to list IPs for the
slightest transgressions, very hard to get unlisted from if you ever get
listed, and provides inaccurate data on why listings occurred. So
Hi,
Anyone else seeing issues with deliveries to outlook.com and subsequent
mail.protection.outlook.com hosted domains? Looks like it started around
06:50 UTC.
On some deliveries after I send EHLO things goes silent and I timeout
after 300s with loglines like this in my mta (Halon):
Temporarily
Hi,
We've had an outbreak of compromised accounts where someone, apart from
just using the accounts to send spam, has added a forward to a gmail
account to intercept all the users mails.
https://support.google.com/mail/contact/abuse?hl=en requires reporting a
message, and that's not the issue
On 2020-09-09 10:53, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
> “This” was a link to Open a ticket for Hotmail...
>
Referring to "links" using background color works quite poorly when your
recipients read their mail in text/plain... :)
--
BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com
pEpkey.asc
Hi,
Is there anyone from Skynet.be / proximus.be on this list or anyone that
can facilitate a contact?
I'm not getting any response through their normal contact methods to try
and get an ip delisted.
--
BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Hi,
For a long time we've seen quite an odd IP range block causing issues
for us to deliver our customers mails to abg.com (Avis Budget Group).
The IPs of our outbound mail servers are not blocked, but
46.30.211.0/24, where the DNS servers for our outbound mail servers are
located, is. We can't
On 2019-05-13 19:20, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
> On Fri 03/May/2019 16:49:44 +0200 Jonathan Leroy - Inikup via mailop wrote:
>> Le jeu. 2 mai 2019 à 11:54, lukn via mailop a écrit :
>>> does anyone have some (shareable) insight? speculations?
>>
>>
29 matches
Mail list logo
