ow
anything about that domain? I'm putting in a rule to block anything that has
perfora.net in the header.
Eric Henson
Windows Server Team Manager
PFSweb, Inc.
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
Hi, one of my users has a personal account, and she can't access imap.aol.com
on port 993 today.
----
Eric Henson
Windows Server Team Manager
PFSweb, Inc.
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
<>___
mailop mailing
He’s simply suggesting that you relay email through another host that has
enough volume to be whitelisted by Yahoo.
Eric Henson
Windows Server Team Manager
PFSweb, Inc.
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
From: mailop On Behalf Of Odhiambo Washington
Sent: Monday
eir rating.
----
Eric Henson
Windows Server Team Manager
PFSweb, Inc.
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
From: Michael Wise
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 6:47 PM
To: Eric Henson ; Rob McEwen ;
mailop@mailop.org
Subject: RE: [mailop] Spamhaus DBL listing
If you&
hasn't changed since the last Exchange update was installed.
If anyone wants to scan that specific page, be my guest.
----
Eric Henson
Windows Server Team Manager
PFSweb, Inc.
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
From: mailop On Behalf Of Rob McEwen
Sent: Wednesday, Octob
nsparency page?
That redirect page (https://owa.pfsweb.com/owa/redir.aspx) is getting hit a
lot because we're migrating to Office365, but it's working as expected-it asks
for username and password. Things that should normally be asked for by your
webmail.
Eric Henson
Windows Se
I signed up for their FBL and haven’t had a problem since. Their users like to
use the junk button on transactional emails and replies to their own customer
service inquiries.
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com<h
How many mailboxes? If you're small, you can do just fine with a couple of
Barracuda boxes--we've had ours for a couple of years and the big dogs on the
list might laugh, they do okay. I'd recommend going up a size or two from what
you think you need; I've had some CPU issues on mine, firmware h
Are the messages calendar invites, by any chance? In Exchange you can specify
how certain items are sent to certain domains. They should consider looking at
that.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Panizzon
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 2:
The Network Operators Outages list
(outa...@outages.org<mailto:outa...@outages.org>) reports that Lightpath has an
issue; I’m not sure if they are your ISP, or that of Charter. Affected reporter
is in Purchase, NY.
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x
would be a
complete nightmare. So we have rules to prevent credit card numbers from
entering our environment.
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=autoconfig.breitband.ch
Well, your server is vulnerable to Drown and Poodle. Disable SSLv3 support.
Disable RC4 support. Disable SSLv2 support. Reorder your ciphers by strength.
Also, I'm not sure why you think this is appropriate for a mail opera
There's what, 3 major providers? Hotmail, Gmail, Yahoo.
That's not a lot to sign up for.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Klaus Ethgen
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:23 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Mails to microsoft
> To be fair. If you use good password management (ie passwords only used in
> one place), then there is no practical difference between forwarding all your
> mail to gmail and telling gmail the > POP3 password. Both situations let
> Google see all your email, and nothing else.
You're completel
If you do a "reply-all" to Brandon's email, you'll see he works for Google.
Have you ever had a security issue with a microsoft.com website? Can you
provide a news article or other source confirming that their servers were
compromised? I could see there possibly being an issue with the advertis
My company uses Exact Target on behalf of our clients for order
confirmation/ship confirmation emails, been using them for 5+ years. They
typically require the delegation of a DNS subdomain to them (often
e-mail.example.com or similar).
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p
That would be Rob, and although his list has a small subscriber base, it's not
really accurate to say it's defunct.
----
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mail
My guess--with it being soon after 1/1/2017--is that the certificate is using
SHA-1.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Robert Mueller
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 3:52 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] Trying to work out cause of
Google's spam system--as published in their whitepaper some years
ago--penalizes email when users mark the emails as spam. So if I mark that
email as spam without reading it, then the next guy to get one like that is
more likely to have the email end up in the spam bucket.
----
Those subject lines scream "spam" at me. I'd mark those as spam without even
opening them.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Marco
Franceschetti via mailop
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 6:27 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] Mult
Just be aware that using XY will have you labeled as misogynist , XX will have
you labeled a SJW, and XXX will get you blocked by porn filters.
:-)
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
-Original Message-
From: mailop
Survey.paypal.com is a much better choice, since that couldn’t be set up
without the authorization of Paypal.
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com<http://www.pfsweb.com/>
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On
I'm a barracuda customer, if the two of you will provide me your IP addresses
and the ticket numbers I'll see what I can do. Feel free to respond offlist.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Ken O'Driscoll
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:22 A
http://www.mxtoolbox.com will check 50+ blacklists.
Eric Henson
Server Team Manager
PFS
p: 972.881.2900 x 3104
m: 972.948.3424
www.pfsweb.com
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of David Sgro,
Dataspindle
Sent: Wednesday, November 16
Can you just implement a rule that forwards the survey emails sent to those
mailing lists, to the ab...@surveymonkey.com address?
I mean, you can't help what addresses are chosen by their users.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sounds like they might be using some sort of Bogon list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogon_filtering
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of David Hubbard
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 6:21 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] att.net/blocks issues; how to get remov
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866&clcid
(Stolen from Michael's signature)
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Gilles Chehade
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:02 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft
Rathbun posted ticket# SRX1354825893ID in his original email, so…not directed
at him, I’m guessing.
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Laura Atkins
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 6:18 PM
To: Michael Wise
Cc: mailop
Subject: Re: [mailop] Next step Hotmail escalation?
Henson
Cc: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] How many more RBL's do we really need?
Does Barracuda still operate that paid whitelist?
--srs
On 29-Aug-2016, at 7:28 PM, Eric Henson
mailto:ehen...@pfsweb.com>> wrote:
I’ve done lots of RBL testing, for years, and the only RBLs that I’
I’ve done lots of RBL testing, for years, and the only RBLs that I’m using are
the ones that are effective and don’t have false positives: Barracuda RBL and
Spamhaus Zen (paid). But I still do my best to keep my mail servers off the
other lists; usually this just means I stop sending email from
So all I need to do to shut down a competitor is sign up for their mailing
list, then issue a complaint to their ESP?
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Laura Atkins
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 12:08 PM
To: mailop
Subject: Re: [mailop] Mailchi
Here's a week's worth of spam scoring on my Barracuda. We quarantine email from
5.5 to 8.9 and drop silently at 9. You're saying that, simply because a sender
or recipient MIGHT be in Germany, that my US-based mail server has to send an
NDR? And risk getting added to a "backscatter" RBL?
Score
You're giving spammers very valuable information on which of their emails are
classified as spam and which aren't.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Renaud Allard via
mailop
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 4:05 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject:
n Behalf Of Al Iverson
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 6:17 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Got UCE-1 listed yesterday
> Eric Henson wrote:
>>
>> The advantage of ET is that at least it's not MY mail server getting
>> blacklisted; they have a dedicated
Yeah, I did put a moderation rule in place for the specific address but I've
expanded it now to *@domain.de. So I'll know if another email wants to send to
that domain.
The advantage of ET is that at least it's not MY mail server getting
blacklisted; they have a dedicated team, large IP address
oduct that we ship on behalf of our clients)
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:48 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Got UCE-1 listed yesterday
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 6:05 AM, Eri
with the UCE team?
On 16-04-21 06:05 AM, Eric Henson wrote:
> Apparently one of my mail sending IPs was blocked for sending emails
> to a spamtrap used by UCE (I won’t provide it here).
>
> We emailed a PO on behalf of one of our customers.
>
> Subject: Rechnung zur Bestellun
Apparently one of my mail sending IPs was blocked for sending emails to a
spamtrap used by UCE (I won't provide it here).
We emailed a PO on behalf of one of our customers.
Subject: Rechnung zur Bestellung # [redacted] bei [redacted]
Translation: Invoice for Purchase Order # [redacted] at [redact
It's possible that the issue has been corrected already.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 4:44 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] "Spammer TLDs" and IP addresses without a reverse?
On 4/18
The bank emails I receive usually include a piece of information they know
about me (last 4 of account number or similar) to prove it's really from the
bank.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Carl Byington
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:06
I think he means Google has a list of domains and they have a score from 0 to
100 or something like that.
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of G. Miliotis
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 2:45 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] How lon
Do you have Reflexion’s servers in your SPF records as an allowed sender?
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Mark Keymer
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 3:17 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [mailop] Should I be disappointed with Reflexion?
We recently setup our first cus
I'm getting a ton of MXtoolbox.com alerts for my domain; DNS servers offline,
SPF record missing, etc. As far as I can tell, everything is fine.
Does anyone else use mxtoolbox.com who is also getting false alerts today?
Eric Henson
IT Operations Solutions Architect
P
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2015/07/27/exchange-tls-amp-ssl-best-practices.aspx
Exchange 2003 is out of support.
Exchange 2007 support ends 4/11/2017.
Exchange 2010 and later best practice is to disable RC4 and SSLv3.
I’d say it may be best to leave RC4 enabled until 4/11/2017, bu
For my org, I have all my filtering on a single server (well, a pair in
parallel, but you get my meaning). But that's not going to work for Hotmail.
Hotmail undoubtedly has multiple levels of filtering. Each check they do with
the SMTP connection open increases the connection time and decreases
45 matches
Mail list logo
