We have seen extremely large spam campaigns on IPv6 in the past. One thing
that may not be obvious
to smaller providers, is that larger providers are their own special
targets. There are a number
of large spammers who spend a lot of effort directly targeting us, and I
imagine that's also true for
On 2021-10-06 03:05:14 (+0800), Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
On 2021-10-04 21:23, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2021-10-05 05:17:33 (+0800), Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
Turn off IPv6 ;)
I see your ";)" but ... still ... this is terrible advice.
While IPv6 is not perfect, it
My theory is that it's a side effect of their algorithm's and due to low
adoption they don't consider it a priority to work on. Which would,
admittedly, favor the position of pushing faster adoption. But don't get
me to lying, educated guess is still a guess lol
On 2021-10-05 19:12, Jay Hennig
On 10/5/21 12:05, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
It's not terrible advice. Google is more likely to filter to spam folder
from IPv6 addresses. Enough of us have seen it to know we're putting the
puzzle pieces together correctly.
Which on the face of it makes no sense. Spammers, especially
It's not terrible advice. Google is more likely to filter to spam folder
from IPv6 addresses. Enough of us have seen it to know we're putting the
puzzle pieces together correctly. People have been crying that IPv4 is
depleted for well over a decade and ARIN just ran through a bunch of the
wait
On 2021-10-05 05:17:33 (+0800), Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
Turn off IPv6 ;)
I see your ";)" but ... still ... this is terrible advice.
While IPv6 is not perfect, it is less bad than keeping IPv4 alive. IPv4
addresses were exhausted over ten years ago in some registries. It's
time
