On 6/17/20 11:15 PM, Dave Warren via mailop wrote:
> A bit late, sorry.
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, at 04:55, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 13:35 -0600, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if there is any alternative to Outlook to access
>>>
>>>
A bit late, sorry.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, at 04:55, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 13:35 -0600, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
>> Does anyone know if there is any alternative to Outlook to access
>>
>> Exchange Online mailboxes that require modern authentication?
>
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
The weird thing to me is that I thought O365 and outlook.com already
supported OAUTHBEARER (or equivalent).
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:30 PM Daniele Nicolodi via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> On 02/06/2020 02:41, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 28 May 2020, Daniele Nicolodi asked:
> >> The IT department of the organization that is pushing thins says that
> >> modern
On 5 Jun 2020, at 05:26, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
> I don't see the gain as the same attacks are possible over a different
> protocol. I don't think that eliminating IMAP (and keeping SMTP
> submission as far as I know) reduces the attack surface. Am I missing
> something?
Very much
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
On 02/06/2020 02:41, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2020, Daniele Nicolodi asked:
The IT department of the organization that is pushing thins says that
modern authentication and disabling IMAP (over SSL) enhance
On 02/06/2020 02:41, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2020, Daniele Nicolodi asked:
>> The IT department of the organization that is pushing thins says that
>> modern authentication and disabling IMAP (over SSL) enhance security.
>> I don't see how this is the case. Does
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 13:35 -0600, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is any alternative to Outlook to access
>
> Exchange Online mailboxes that require modern authentication?
Take a look at Davmail, it's basically a proxy that sits in-between
your existing "legacy"
On Thu, 28 May 2020, Daniele Nicolodi asked:
The IT department of the organization that is pushing thins says that
modern authentication and disabling IMAP (over SSL) enhance security.
I don't see how this is the case. Does anyone have an opinion?
Phil Pennock replied:
PP> As to IMAP/TLS -- I
> On 2020-05-28 at 13:35 -0600, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
>> Does anyone know if there is any alternative to Outlook to access
>> Exchange Online mailboxes that require modern authentication?
>>
>> The IT department of the organization that is pushing thins says that
>> modern
On 2020-05-28 at 13:35 -0600, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is any alternative to Outlook to access
> Exchange Online mailboxes that require modern authentication?
>
> The IT department of the organization that is pushing thins says that
> modern authentication
On 25/05/2020 04:16, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
>> Does anyone know what "modern authentication" mean in the context of the
>> Office365 / Microsoft email accounts?
>
>
On Mon, 25 May 2020, Daniele Nicolodi via mailop wrote:
Hello,
sorry for the slight OT.
I have an email account with an organization that uses Office365 for
their email. I recently received a email stating that they will be
phasing out "basic authentication" and that "modern authentication"
Hello,
sorry for the slight OT.
I have an email account with an organization that uses Office365 for
their email. I recently received a email stating that they will be
phasing out "basic authentication" and that "modern authentication" will
be required starting from July 1st. There isn't any
14 matches
Mail list logo
