==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
"1970’li ve 1980’li yıllarda İngilizce konuşulan dünyada Marksizm üzerine
Fransızca
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
For Turkish readers available at:
http://dogangocmen.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/kan
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Louis, if you check the link I provided you will see on the title of the
book saying
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Those of you interested in classical Turkish music may listen to some of the
songs o
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
S.Artisan,
you are probabily to quick to criticise a book which you probabily have h
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
A short review of Domenico Losurdo's book on Stalin is below:
*Stalin. **Story and
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2010/1/2 Mark Lause
"And I look forward to reading an honest defense of Stalin."
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2010/1/2 Carlos Eduardo Rebello
"in a spirit opposite to the Service biography
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I am replying to the subject line which you suggested that it should be
dropped
200
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 brad bauerly
> Surely there must be free public psychotherapy in this w
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Dear Comrade,
I have not implied anything like that.
As I said I am not able to go o
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 Mark Lause
> ==
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 Jeff
"For instance, one argument was over whether the proposed health c
...@gmail.com below.
Dogan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dogan Gocmen
Date: 2009/12/27
Subject: Re: Dismiss the liberal Dogan from MarxMail list
To: ok.president+n...@gmail.com
2009/12/27 Ruthless Critic of All that Exists
>
"Dismiss the liberal Dogan from MarxMail lis
alism at least since 1890s as already Rosa Luxemburg indicated.
Dogan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark A. Lause
Date: 2009/12/27
Subject: Re: Dismiss the liberal Dogan from MarxMail list
To: ok.president+n...@gmail.com , Dogan
Gocmen
He's not a liberal. He's CP. A
--
From: Ruthless Critic of All that Exists
>
Date: 2009/12/27
Subject: Dismiss the liberal Dogan from MarxMail list
To: "Mark A. Lause" , Dogan Gocmen <
dgn.g...@googlemail.com>
Mark Lause wrote:
"For Dogan, this criterion is a settled question and requires n
courageous enough to send it to the mailing list.I am forwarding it. In
the next email I will forward my reply.
Dogan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruthless Critic of All that Exists
>
Date: 2009/12/27
Subject: Dismiss the liberal Dogan from MarxMail list
To: "Mark A. Lause&
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 Mehmet Cagatay
>
"If I remember correctly, I told you before that I've
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 Mark Lause
"This "method" is entirely consistent. Determined not to be
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/27 Mehmet Cagatay
"I haven't visited it for a long time but a typical post
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/26 Mark Lause
"Dugan,
Let's not engage in Roswell logic
You say the bil
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/26 Jim Farmelant
"(here on this list
by people like Dogan)
that cite the Pa
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/26 Jim Farmelant
"What are we to make of a communist party
that is objectiv
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Marx's position on free trade illustrates a certain logic as to the question
of how
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/23 Mark Lause :
'"America I will sell you strophes $2500 apiece $500 down on
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
New Times, New Opportunities
Sam Webb, National Chair, CPUSA
National Committee Meet
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
There were some five replies to my last posts. Let me reply to them
collectively by
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/18 Mark Lause markala...@gmail.com:
"It supports ruling class parties. It
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/17 S. Artesian http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith P
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/16 S. Artesian http://www.cpusa.org/article/view/758
Your question may be a
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/16 S. Artesian http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith P
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/12/16 Einde O'Callaghan http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam S
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
"Given the political and economic dynamics at this moment, three outcomes
are possib
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
This seems to be useful as well.Doğan
http://www.helium.com/items/118196-roman-fam
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
*This might be useful.
Doğan
http://history-world.org/greece%20economy.htm
Greek Pa
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
A lesson from Seattle for Copenhagen: Vigorous Activism Can Defeat the
Denialists Pa
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.anc.org.za/un/conference/ababing.html
“The Role of the German Democratic
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
http://www.workers.org/ww/2004/lgbtseries1104.php
Same-sex rights in East Germany Le
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/11/24 Louis Proyect:
Marxmail, on the other hand, was established to discuss pr
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/11/24 S. Artesian:
This is a touching commentary which ignores the significant
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
2009/11/21 S. Artesian:
The "left in general" did not cause the collapse of those "f
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
WW COMMENTARY
Another side of the Berlin Wall
By Greg Butterfield
Published Nov 20
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
"I imagine that others must have had thoughts such as these, but
I’ve not seen much
Dear Michael,
I thank you very much for the thoughts and references below. They are very
useful indeed.
Yours,
Doğan
2009/10/30 Michael Perelman
> I am not sure this will be useful, but I hope so:
>
> Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of
> Epistemology (Londo
This is going to be more a social democratic party than a new revolutionary
party.
To justify why they need a new party they need to say something more and
programmatic than just
that they are "leading an initiative to establish a new left political party
in South
Africa because of the dissatisfact
The term Knowledge Economy (KE) or Knowledge Based Economy (KBE) is used in
a loose way to refer to the researches, developments and economic activities
in Information and Communication Technology. In recent years many other
terms have been invented and many others will follow to describe similar
d
Louis, thanks again for pointing out your essay to me.
I read it. Warm and insightful anecdotes. Thanks again.
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B.
Dear Louis,
thank you very much for your references.
Doğan
2009/10/23 Louis Proyect
> Dogan Gocmen wrote:
> > Uzun yıllardan sonra Türkiye felsefecileri (ve genel olarak aydınları)
> > arasındaki sohbet ve tartışmalara yakından kulak misafiri olduğumda,
> Martin
> &g
Pat, thank you very much for sharing your observations.
I think I do not have to add to this much. Just one point Marx and Engels
did pay a lot of attention to the issues within a state-owned system.
Therefore Engels conclusion that it was not the final solution. Pease look
at what Marx says about
Michael, lets discuss all these issues in Turkey. We will have almost one
week, so enough time to exchange the results of our research. I will have
the onlie version of Smith's work and correspondence with me. I am looking
forward to seeing you in few days in Turkey.
--
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dog
"What did the other Scottish philosophers
have to say concerning alienation? What
did Hume have to say on the subject?
BTW can you give some references as to
where Smith describes the possibility of
communism?"
Jim,
thank you very much for your questions. I am not sure whether I can and
shall an
Pat,
you are raising here en issue that in my view refers to a point that is in
all theories of socialism, including that of Marx and Engels, most
contravercial and at the same time weakest one. However I think this is not
a mere issue of theory. The question how to run an economy that is
controll
Pat,
can you please say a bit more?
Thank you,
--
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B. Tauris,
London&New York 2007
___
As to alienation issue: it is an issue raised by all classical Scottish
philosophers including Adam Smith.
However as George Lukacs has shown it became a conservative concept in the
20th century. The concept the Marxists have to start with is not alienation
(no longer). Rather they have to start wi
I think the question in relation Smith is not honesty or dishonesty.
This is a subjective approach. We should reject the dishonest
picture of Adam Smith that has been presented to us by Neoliberlas.
Remember that along with Hegel's Smith work is one of the most important
source and compenent part o
"The Partei Die Linke shows the way forward? Well, yes, back into bourgeois
politics."
A very good point. In my view this party is not a left wing party at all,
because it says "yes to wage labour not to cheap labour."
What is left in this statement? It does a good job for bourgeosie to
integrate
The peculiar historical development of German society therefore forbids, in
that country, all original work in bourgeois economy; but not the criticism
of that economy. So far as such criticism represents a class, it can only
represent the class whose vocation in history is the overthrow of the
cap
The conference held in Turkey/Kocaeli (nearby İstanbul) is the first annual
conference of the series of conferences to be organised under the general
heading of *International Congress of Political Economy*. Next year's
conference might be on Keynes, Marx and crisis. This is not definit
yet. (ple
In the evet of WW I Lenin went and studied Hegel's logic.
Marx has to be studied with his sources: philosophical, political economic,
political and so on.
Historical approach that Marx higly valued applies laso to the study of
Marx.
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of Th
I got it Michael,
it is on the front page of your web site.
-
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B. Tauris,
London&New York 2007
Hi Michael,
This is what comes up when I click on the link you gave:
"You are not allowed to edit this post."
---
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B
I usually like comrade Fuwa Tetsuzo. But the statement below is one of those
which I do not share.
Study for example the situation and the role of women in soviet society and
compare it with any comparable capitalist society.
When I visited some years ago Russia I attended a lecture on the situatio
> http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/22515
>
>
"Nonetheless, China's historic leap from oblivion into one of the top 21st
century economies and its impressive results from recent stimulus
initiatives both vividly illustrate the basic superiority of a centralized
rational investment plan, even one
"No, the proper translation from German would be "About the critique of
political economy", or "On the critique of political economy""
Well, "on" is one meaning of "Zur". In that case it begs the question why
Marx did not put simply 'Über die Kritik der politischen Ökonomie'.
As you know "Zur" is
Marx's project for the critique of political economy must be taken as a
whole.
It starts with his first work *Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie* which
properly translated means To the Critique of Political Economy.
Then follows by *Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie* which
properly tr
Rosa L. makes claims and, on the contrary to any reasonable philosopher,
does not give any reason. She says dialectical philosophy is conservative.
This is fine. But expects me to prove the contrary. Why shall I do her job?
She is the one to give reason, not me to prove the contrary. So if she want
"In which case, I'm in good company, since no one knows what it
'is about' -- or if they do, they have kept that secret well hidden for
200 years."
Hidden to her as she is not able to see the revolutionary force of
dialectic.
To mention another Rosa, Rosa Luxemburg describes the dialectic as the
'
Jim,
do you think it is worth to think about this:
"If anything, it's dialecticians who are the conservatives, since they are
quite happy to ape the dogmatic and a priori thought-forms of traditional
philosophy."
I am sorry to say tha but I guess she does not know what dialectic is about.
---
"who gives a shit about this stuff? my grandfather fought these fights
and he's long since dead and gone 40+ years ago."
On the one hand I agree that we have to fight our fights. On the other hand
our history is part of our present and if we want to make the future we have
to learn from our past i
are real
debates if they involve 'public'.
2009/8/13 Dogan Gocmen
> I agree with Mark that Stalin-Trotsky debatte is a distinct debate from the
> debate on the historical role of the Soviet Union before, during and after
> the WW II. But these two debates can hardly be separa
I agree with Mark that Stalin-Trotsky debatte is a distinct debate from the
debate on the historical role of the Soviet Union before, during and after
the WW II. But these two debates can hardly be separated and do not think it
is settled at all as we just start thinking about the issues involved f
"Jscotlive loses his posting privileges until September 1."
I protest emphatically as he has the right to defend against dishonest
claims and falsifications.
The debate was coming to its end any way. The post by Sartesian has provoked
these responses.
He simply could have made his point by address
"I believe Mark Lause said it properly when he wrote that he has never been
so disgusted by a discussion on this list. I think that's right, but if I
have it wrong, my apologies to Mark, but the discussion on the list still
ranks as perhaps the most disgusting..
This discussion has seen a "defen
"The Great Patriotic War"
this expression has been referred to many times, probabily as a critique of
the strategy of the Soviet Union.
Below there is a passage from Engels' Speeches in Ebersfelde in which he
ackonledges this. From various writings and letters of Marx and Engels I
know that they r
I am sorry for spaming you. This is my last post today. I finally found the
English translation of the poem by Nazım Hikmet:
*The Dead Little Girl*
- Nazim Hikmet
It is me knocking at your door
- at how many doors i've been
But no one can see me
Since the dead are invisible.
I died at Hiroshima
And on this link you can listen to Nazım Hikmet reading out his peom and
John Beaz singing the song.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3I4OnAuZIo
--
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentim
At the link below there is the song on Hiroshima. It is based on Nazım
Hikmet's poem "little Girl".
It was originally composed by Zülfi Livaneli but it is sung by John Beaz. As
it is on facebook I do not whether you can get to the link but thought I
should share it with you.
http://www.facebook.co
Fred,
I will stick to what the Moderator recommended: end of the debate unless
there some new arguments or evidences. The point is to remain comrades
despite the differences. I have never entered the Stalin-Trotsky-debate
simply
because I think they had their problems and fought their fights and we
2009/8/6 lara crete
>
> Dear friend ,I have noticed and am listening to your voice in this
> list for quite a long time. Always a pleasure to hear it through this
> honorable and mostly harmonious choir. Thank you for your last post
> on violence. As to the movie I described as "The Women's Re
I am not sure whether I was thinking of this passage. Let me check.
--
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Adam Smith Problem:
Reconciling Human Nature and Society in
The Theory of Moral Sentiments and Wealth of Nations, I. B. Tauris,
London&New York 2007
___
This a short paper of mine, which produced some years ago:
*Theories of Violence*
It is almost impossible to provide a satisfactory definition of violence for
all times and circumstances. Violence has many forms and varies according to
contexts and circumstances. Its boundaries are fluid and it
Lara, thank you very much for this. I have not seen them yet, but will do
soon.
Here is a short article by me, describing how October Revolution and Soviet
Union played an emancipatory role in national liberation movements before
and after the WWII. It is in German:
*"Die Oktoberrevolution hat fü
"Please comrades, learn some deep appreciation of what the world suffered
from fascism and forget arguing about what might have been if some of the
political struggles in the Soviet Union had concluded differently. The
Soviet Union survived the greatest war in history - and saved us all."
Dear Pa
2009/8/5 S. Artesian
> This is the point where the discussion becomes more than inane; it becomes
> downright oppressive.
>
>
In this debate I said everything I can contribute and I think generally that
everything is said what is to be said.
-
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
2009/8/5
"There were a good many
mistakes, and a great deal of tragedy
in the world's first attempt to
construct a socialist state. It is
important to study that record
seriously and understand it for
what it was, and what it was not."
This is exactly what needs to be done bur never buy in the a
2009/8/5 Bhaskar Sunkara
Aren't you purists forgetting what the Nazis did to Soviet womanhood
George
"Why is that relevant?"
This is relevant because every soldier in the Red Army suffered from the
loss of his relatives either by rape or otherwise by Nazis.
--
Dogan Göcmen
"This does not mean Satanizing Stalin or the USSR. But we should accept
that on the POLITICAL side, the war was waged as a war of revenge
against the German people not as a war of liberation from Fascism AND
capitalism."
Everything you say is accepted except the point above.
I want to see evidenc
Mark, the claims you put forward against Soviet Union are products of
Western secret and inteligent services. If you are not able to argue based
on historical documents leave it there. This rubish you express I can read
anywhere in bourgeois media. Soviet Union have not just freed humanity from
fas
"the Soviet Union definitely defeated Germany"
You see, no one in the Soviet Union after the defeat of fascism said that
they defeated Germany. They clearly differentiated between fascism and its
basis on the one hand and German people on the other. They did not want to
humiliate Germans but extin
The problem we are expressing and the point we seem to miss in this thread
probably this: there is no third front which we may support without any
remorse and difficulty. We had the same problem with the invasion of Iraq.
Lenin asserts in his book on imperialism that in the age of imperialism no
co
There is an insightful Article by Domenico Losurdo, entitled *Toward a
Critique of the Category of Totalitarianism*, in «Historical Materialism»,
no. 12, 2 (2004), pp. 25-55. This may help to leave behind all those
vulgarisms.
--
Dogan Göcmen
(http://dogangocmen.wordpress.com/)
Author of The Ad
Dear All,
a draft paper by İsmail Şiriner and me is available now. Comments are always
welcome...
"The Nature and Paradoxes of Freedom
Freedom is a powerful Idea. As a concept, combined with equality and
fraternity, it was
the forceful ideal drive for a series of revolutions in Europe and
92 matches
Mail list logo