>> if (x > 0.0 && x < *xm) *xm = x;
>> if (y > 0.0 && y < *ym) *ym = y;
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> In the last 2 lines, why are xm and ym being clipped at 0, when x0 and
>> y0 are not?
> xm and ym are the minimum positive values, used for log scales.
> Definitely worth a comment.
I
Eric Firing wrote:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>
>> Eric Firing wrote:
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> A bug was recently pointed out: axhline, axvline, axhspan, axvspan
>>> mess up the ax.dataLim. I committed a quick fix for axhline and
>>> axvline, but I don't think that what I did is a good solution, so
Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> A bug was recently pointed out: axhline, axvline, axhspan, axvspan
>> mess up the ax.dataLim. I committed a quick fix for axhline and
>> axvline, but I don't think that what I did is a good solution, so
>> before doing anything fo
Eric Firing wrote:
> Mike,
>
> A bug was recently pointed out: axhline, axvline, axhspan, axvspan
> mess up the ax.dataLim. I committed a quick fix for axhline and
> axvline, but I don't think that what I did is a good solution, so
> before doing anything for axhspan and axvspan I want to arr
Mike,
A bug was recently pointed out: axhline, axvline, axhspan, axvspan mess
up the ax.dataLim. I committed a quick fix for axhline and axvline, but
I don't think that what I did is a good solution, so before doing
anything for axhspan and axvspan I want to arrive at a better strategy.
What
