Re: Key bindings for the Samsung Chromebook

2014-05-26 Thread Jane Trembath
On 26 May 2014, at 1:45, Theodore Kilgore kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote: Hello, I am trying to make a Samsung Chromebook to support Linux functionality in a manner to which I am accustomed. The problem is missing keys. A possibly noninclusive list follows, for anyone who might

Key bindings for the Samsung Chromebook

2014-05-25 Thread Theodore Kilgore
functions do not work. -- the Learn Keys option could not understand anything which I had done, either. So, when all else fails one should read the man page, where there is a section called Redefine hotkey bindings. So I went and got a copy of the file and put it in a local directory to fool

Re: Simple mc.ext/bindings extension isn't working...

2012-05-01 Thread Trey Blancher
I figured it out. Turns out file sees .xoj files as gzip, thus type/^gzip was matching before regex/\.xoj$ (which I put at the bottom of mc.ext/bindings, above the default/* rule). On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Trey Blancher t...@blancher.net wrote: I'm using mc 4.8.1 (Debian wheezy

Simple mc.ext/bindings extension isn't working...

2012-04-30 Thread Trey Blancher
the .xoj file in more, which again, isn't launching it in Xournal. I've made sure to save mc.ext or bindings, exited and restarted mc, and my results don't change. I created another extension, and it seems to be OK: # kdb regex/\.kdb$ Open=keepassx %f View=keepassx %f And it seems to work

vim bindings

2009-09-11 Thread Сергей Миронов
Hello people! Thanks for beautiful manager. I want to ask if there are branches/forks of mc with vim-like key bindings support? Vim users will like this thing very much. -- Thanks, Sergey ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

MC key bindings

2007-10-22 Thread Ron van Schyndel
over serial connection to a Pyramid unix box. It is 'scan' by Patrick J. Wolfe and was released in comp.sources.misc vol 20 issue 1, 21 May 1991 You can unshar (*remember that? :) it from Google groups. It was an ordinary FM, but its main virtue for now was runtime configurable key bindings

Re: how to repair nonfunctioning entries in extension bindings file?

2007-05-28 Thread kilgota
Kilgore -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:00:43 -0500 (CDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mc@gnome.org Subject: how to repair nonfunctioning entries in extension bindings file? I have just done some major upgrades. Now some, though definitely not all, of my extension

how to repair nonfunctioning entries in extension bindings file?

2007-05-26 Thread kilgota
I have just done some major upgrades. Now some, though definitely not all, of my extension bindings seem to be broken. I also upgraded Midnight Commander after that, because of this problem. However the problem did not go away. I know that the failure is specific because the bindings for .tex

Lost bindings

2007-04-25 Thread Reynir Stefansson
I have noted that mc seems to very occasionally forget, partly or wholly, bindings and maybe other stuff, too. Given how rarely it happens, I have found no pattern to it. Note: This is the plain 4.6.1 I run on Magrat, my personal server of all good things. Perhaps it has been fixed

Changed postscript and dvi bindings to deal with gzipped files

2006-08-06 Thread David Nebauer
In order to open gzipped postscript and dvi files I changed on my system the bindings for those file types: PS type/^PostScript-- regex/\.([pP][sS])(\.[gG][zZ])?$ DVI regex/\.([dD][vV][iI])$ -- regex/\.([dD][vV][iI])(\.[gG][zZ])?$ 'run-mailcap' copes fine

Key Bindings

2006-03-17 Thread Norbert Szetei
Hello, sorry for this maybe dispenable email, but I can't find answer to this question via google/documentation/mails. from faq: 2.8 How do I change the key bindings? There is no generic way to reconfigure the key bindings. You can use the Learn Keys dialog to assign keys to some actions listed

Re: [bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-31 Thread Roland Illig
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Roland, On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 08:28, Roland Illig wrote: Just because all other directories have their own ChangeLog, too. Don't you like it? O yes, I do actually. Only I was a bit surprised the same change log entries ended up in src/ChangeLog for HEAD. I

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-25 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #7872 (project mc): Roland, thanks for fixing the removal of @PERL@ and adding a few more makefile interpreters in the file matches. Could you please commit these fixes to PRE as well? As long as it is uncertain from which branch we will eventually see a release I'd

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-24 Thread Roland Illig
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #7872 (project mc): I committed a patch to the syntax/Syntax file that matches this: file ..\*\\.(py|PY)$ Python\sProgram ^#!.\*[\s/]python So the first line only has to contain python (for /usr/bin/env) or /python (for regular interpreters).

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-24 Thread Roland Illig
Update of bug #7872 (project mc): Status:None = Fixed Open/Closed:Open = Closed Release: 4.6.0 = current (CVS or snapshot) Platform Version:

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-23 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #7872 (project mc): [...] We could just as well start matching all possible paths to the binaries. i can't claim i'd understand that paragraph. :} [...] If you could comment on the usefulness [...] i'm can't claim to be a python wiz, either.

Re: [bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-23 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 20:08 +, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Follow-up Comment #7, bug #7872 (project mc): My question is why do we need the extra code to match '/usr/bin/env' if all we need to match is 'perl'? It seems redundant. Like trying to match '/usr/bin/perl',

Re: [bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-23 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 22:43, Pavel Roskin wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 20:08 +, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Follow-up Comment #7, bug #7872 (project mc): My question is why do we need the extra code to match '/usr/bin/env' if all we need to match is 'perl'? It seems

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-23 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #7872 (project mc): i'd prefer to have the exact match as a simple correctness check. oh, well. is just the same as , except that you can embed physical newlines in this type of string. actually reading the BNF in the page i linked to would have revealed that (as it

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-23 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #7872 (project mc): I just don't feel like actually verifying this. Duh. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=7872 ___

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-22 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #7872 (project mc): For the Syntax.diff patch, I suggest that we only check for ^#!.\*/perl This is much easier to read. Roland ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-22 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #7872 (project mc): The use of matching /usr/bin/env seems rather pointless if you are already matching the interpreter on the first line. We could just as well start matching all possible paths to the binaries. Regarding the syntax additions, I don't do python yet. If

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #7872 (project mc): err, i misread it. in fact, this is very similar to what i have submitted some time ago (and somehow i thought it was already committed ... which is sort of like believing in santa claus ;). it's only pointless to look for env somewhere else than in

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-16 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #7872 (project mc): What's the point of the (env\s)? change? And isn't 'context ' a comment? Don't you mean to see changes to the 'context '? Please be so kind to provide a patch (diff -up) so it is more clear what you do want to see changed.

[bug #7872] Suggested changes in Python syntax bindings

2005-05-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #7872 (project mc): What's the point of the (env\s)? change? pointless, imo. env located in any other directory is entirely against the idea of using it in the first place ... And isn't 'context ' a comment? nope. read the lang spec. :-P

Re: keyboard bindings in mcedit

2005-04-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Vitja Makarov wrote: Hi, all! This patch implements user-defined keyboard bindings for mcedit. Bindings are stored in ~/.mc/cooledit/cooledit.bindings file, attached file contains patch against current cvs tree configuration sample. What's the difference between

Re: keyboard bindings in mcedit (fwd)

2005-04-08 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, Please, post to the list and not to my personal e-mail address - I do read the list as many others. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:33:48 +0400 From: Vitja Makarov To: Pavel Tsekov Subject: Re: keyboard bindings in mcedit I've fixed some bugs... Have

bindings

2003-07-30 Thread johnny
Hello, Does anyone have a proper config file (bindings) for mc? I wanna be able to associate some common used file extensions to the following apps: _ xcf psd | gimp | sxw doc rtf xls ppt | openoffice | sk ai | sketch | htm html | mozilla-remote | ogg

Re: bindings

2003-07-30 Thread Russell Shaw
johnny wrote: Hello, Does anyone have a proper config file (bindings) for mc? I wanna be able to associate some common used file extensions to the following apps: _ xcf psd| gimp| sxw doc rtf xls ppt

Re: Reconfiguring key bindings

2003-03-11 Thread Niklas Höglund
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:52:44AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! I've looked in the manual, and in the FAQ, but I can't find how to change the key bindings of mc (version 4.6.0). What I want is to be able to use tab completion in the command line with tab, as my fingers do

Re: Reconfiguring key bindings

2003-03-11 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hi, Peter! I support you, Pavel, on not allowing too flexible key binding. But maybe for such a cool feature, like TAB completion, personal exception coud be granted? 8^) I'm not against flexible key bindings. I'm just stating that it's not available because the goal of Learn Keys is to make

Re: Reconfiguring key bindings

2003-03-09 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! I've looked in the manual, and in the FAQ, but I can't find how to change the key bindings of mc (version 4.6.0). What I want is to be able to use tab completion in the command line with tab, as my fingers do that automatically. Sorry, the only way to do it is to redefine Tab as M-Tab