From: "J. van de Griek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeanmougin schrieb:
I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more read
errors.
Well, that would be a problem with the CD burner, not with the player.
If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all
"J. van de Griek" wrote:
See, the problem in this situation is that the actual problem itself can be
anywhere in either the burner, the media, the player, or in a combination of
any of them...
Hopefully, more and more drives will start coming out with "burnproof"
technology, like the
las wrote:
"J. van de Griek" wrote:
See, the problem in this situation is that the actual problem itself can
be
anywhere in either the burner, the media, the player, or in a
combination of
any of them...
Hopefully, more and more drives will start coming out with "burnproof"
JT wrote:
Neither of those are accurate. The *.cda files are a virtual
filesystem Windows 9x imposes on CDs. There are no files on am
audio CD, just 44.1KHz PCM audio data. The CD burning program
converts the waves to that data when it burns the CD.
No, I stated just what you mentioned
PrinceGaz a ecri:
From: "J. van de Griek" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all
that,
chances of burn errors or poorly readable result discs are higher.
And that is probably what the originator of this thread meant. So, in
that
case,
to be able
to read it. That's probably why you can only play it in your cd-rom.
Nathan White
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mike Burger
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding
"J. van de Griek" wrote:
You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.
Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.
That's right. I wonder where Mike got that one from? I think that he has
either
Jeanmougin wrote:
I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more read
errors.
Not if your equipment can handle the speed.
Larry
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
I don't think it matters on how fast you burn the CD. If you want your audio
CD to be playable by other stereo or boombox, you will have to choose the
option "close disc" in your CD burning software. If you don't close the disc,
you can make changes but
2000 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding
Wish I could concur...I have a Ricoh 2x burner, and when I burned my
audio CDs at 2x, my Pioneer CD player wouldn't play them. My other
CD-ROMS would read them just fine, but my regular a
Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned a couple of
audio CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R in my
burner) at 2x (maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc
changer in the next room could not play the CD. Any CD-ROM
I use Easy CD Creator, and I have to decide if it will be a data CD or
an audio CD that will play on any Cd player before I start the
recording.
Mike Burger wrote:
The procedure for copying my audio CDs is no different the than the
procedure for burning my data CDs...copy the tracks from
Where I "got that one from" was experience...I burned
a couple of audio
CDs (copying an audio CD in my CD-ROM drive to a CD-R
in my burner) at 2x
(maximum speed of my burner), and my Pioneer 6-disc
changer in the next
room could not play the CD. Any CD-ROM in the house
could (and I
It's digital. As long as there are ones and zeros to be read correctly,
it will work. If it keeps getting coasters at 6x, you have a problem.
If not, you are ok.
PrinceGaz wrote:
I've finally replaced my Creative Labs CD burner with a drive which
actually works, the Ricoh MP9060A which
* "J. Coon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 06 Nov 2000
| I think you are wrong on that.
He is wrong on that. I burn at 4x-8x and play on several different CD
players, no problems.
--
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ accelerate to
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
Wish I could concur...I have a Ricoh 2x
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, las wrote:
"J. van de Griek" wrote:
You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.
Burn your audio CD's as fast as you want, your CD player will still play
them at 1x speed, since that's what it's designed to do.
That's right. I wonder where Mike got
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is
saying "Sup!?!" :)
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding
Wish I could concur...I have a Ricoh 2x burner, and when I burned my
Mike Burger wrote:
The one thing that I didn't see noted, yet, is that if you're burning CDs
for use in regular CD players, it doesn't matter how fast your burner can
run...you still need to burn the CD at 1x for a regular CD player to read
them.
You didn;t see that noted because it's
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds
Jeanmougin schrieb:
I tought that when you burnt a CDR at speeds over 1x or 2x, u had more
read
errors.
Well, that would be a problem with the CD burner, not with the player.
If the burning device is of mediocre quality, or the media isn't all that,
chances of burn errors or poorly readable
and drop MP3. It will be
converted to wave file on the fly to burn to audio cd.
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan White" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:37 PM
Subject: RE: MD: Speeding
Larry wrote:
Nate, I'm not sure if that is ac
The burner is a Ricoh 6200S, running on an Adaptec 2940U2W. The only
issue I've ever seen, really, is what I've described, when it comes to
this type of burn. Other than the obvious overrun/underrun which
occasionally happens, no matter what software/burner/interface, etc you
use, this is
on the about CDR link.
- Original Message -=20
From: "Mike Burger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: MD: Speeding
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, las wrote:
=20
=20
"J. van de Griek" wrote:
=20
You didn;t see that noted because it's hogwash.
Nathan White wrote:
You need to convert your
audio files to *.cda (I think that's what it is) for CD players to be able
to read it. That's probably why you can only play it in your cd-rom.
Nate, I'm not sure if that is accurate. I believe that a CD player can also
read wave files (if
yea...like i said the media _OR_ the player...many consumer entertaintment
products...especially older ones dont have the laser that will recognize
cdr/cdrw but the newer ones do...tho one thing i noticed is that sometimes
blank audio cds are recognized but not at all times
I don't think
On 6 Nov 2000, at 9:39, Les@musicmixers wrote:
The most important factor to consider is the blank you use. Unlike
MD, CDR media has a wide range of quality and not all will even be
recognized in a picky cd player.
This cannot be stressed enough. Especially with CDRW's. And
just because
You need to convert your
audio files to *.cda (I think that's what it is) for CD players to
be able to read it.
Nate, I'm not sure if that is accurate. I believe that a CD player
can also read wave files (if they can't then the wave files are
somehow automatically converted because
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
Mike Burger wrote:
..I burned a couple of
I've finally replaced my Creative Labs CD burner with a drive which
actually works, the Ricoh MP9060A which can burn CD-R at up to 6x.
My question is, assuming the PC can get the data to the drive quick
enough to avoid under-runs (which it can) is there any disadvantage to
burning at 6x (the
PrinceGaz wrote:
is there any disadvantage to
burning at 6x (the discs I have are rated for up to 8x burning) rather
than 4x?
I'd rather not go back to 2x burning but would a slightly slower than
max speed; 4x rather than 6x give better more readable discs and be
worth the extra six or so
32 matches
Mail list logo
