On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Ralph Smeets wrote:
> Why should it be a bug? It could be a way to get around the following
> problem:
> L = -R Ie, The left channel has the opposite phase of the right
> channel. Thus (L+R)/2 would result in 0 With (L(t)+R(t-1))/2 you keep
> a signal!
You have a go
Ralph pointed out,
| Why should it be a bug? It could be a way to get around the following
| problem:
| L = -R Ie, The left channel has the opposite phase of the right
| channel. Thus (L+R)/2 would result in 0 With (L(t)+R(t-1))/2 you keep
| a signal!
(Would stereo where L=-R sound lik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jonathan Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So, to conclude, Sony's monauralizing algorithm has the channels out of
> > sync. by one sample, with the left channel one sample in front of the
> > right channel. I don't think this is occuring in the SPDIF data st
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Eric Woudenberg wrote:
> May I ask that you please write up your findings carefully and let me
> post it as its own web page on the MDCP?
Sure. I'll get on to it tomorrow.
> It would be interesting to try this experiment on some other
> equipment, a portable, and a machin
I have been messing around with my MD recorder again this morning and I
think I may have figured out what is happening.
The results I posted previously show a frequency dependant loss in volume,
which increases as the frequency increases.
If the signals from the two input channels were out of p
