Re: MD: too much of a god thing: a drawback of MDLP

2001-08-19 Thread Stuart Howlette
There seems to be too much attention placed on the limitations of MD's titling capabilities, but, as in the MD vs MP3 debate we had recently, only that and the transfer came up as flaws with the system. Titling, to me, is more of a novelty than as a compulsory part of recording. Now, this is

Re: MD: too much of a god thing: a drawback of MDLP

2001-08-19 Thread David W. Tamkin
Stuart Howlette wrote, | Titling, to me, is | more of a novelty than as a compulsory part of recording. And for me it is a nicety rather than a necessity. That's why I called hitting its limit a drawback of MDLP in the subject line and not the downfall of MDLP. | Maybe the best idea, though,

Re: MD: too much of a god thing: a drawback of MDLP

2001-08-19 Thread Stuart Howlette
Maybe something thats minor would actually be worth hinting to Sony, simply because they are more likely to change a little part of MiniDiscs than the whole infrastructure as some were mentioning in the debate. From where I see it, it would only be the case of updating the firmware.

MD: too much of a god thing: a drawback of MDLP

2001-08-18 Thread David W. Tamkin
Dang. It's nice to put loads of music and lots of tracks onto a single MD. But when it's a compilation and each track needs to be noted with song title and artist (in contrast to copying an album or several by one artist, where the performer need be named once in the disc title and not on

Re: MD: too much of a god thing: a drawback of MDLP

2001-08-18 Thread PrinceGaz
From: David W. Tamkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's nice to put loads of music and lots of tracks onto a single MD. But when it's a compilation and each track needs to be noted with song title and artist (in contrast to copying an album or several by one artist, where the performer need be named