[ Note Reply-To ]
"ext Zhang, Xing Z" writes:
> From d-feet, I can see bus name "com.intel.meego.provider", strangely
> there is nothing in "Object Paths"! however, context-provider-example
> rightly register its paths, I can see
> "/org/maemo/contextkit/Example/Count" ...
Ok, I think you need
"Deng, Ying An" writes:
> Hi,
> I tried to use yum tool to find the mx-gtk package, but failed. Could anybody
> tell me where I can get it and install it?
it's in mx project.
the error you saw means the configure cannot find the .pc file. It could
be you didn't install it properly, or you need
Hello Meego people,
I would like to ask what is the community opinion about using open
binder in Meego
http://www.angryredplanet.com/~hackbod/openbinder/docs/html/index.html
.
Of course as usual "using" can be seen in many different aspect as
using as part of the platform, or just using it as a thi
Hi,
I was trying to compile code from git, but got following error:
checking for MX... configure: error: Package requirements (mx-gtk-1.0) were not
met:
No package 'mx-gtk-1.0' found
I tried to use yum tool to find the mx-gtk package, but failed. Could anybody
tell me where I can get it and i
Thanks all.
The document explains many. Unfortunately I still failed :(
I can see provider in context-commander now, it names
"session:com.intel.meego.provi...@contextkit-dbus"
After a while, commander reports:
2010-03-25 09:22:41 [libcontextsubscriber] WARNING [provider.cpp:267:void
ContextSubs
FYI
Note the spirit of this startup with what seems to be a similar MeeGo form
factor.
http://enso-now.com/n/about_us.php
-E
http://vCardCloud.com
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
something that might be good to look into might be uzbl and adapting the
uzbl core to be used on handheld devices
uzbl is a webkit/gtk (written in C) based html displayer and has a decent
api that you can script to fairly easy. they have two python scripts that
make it a full featured browser. it i
On 24 March 2010 19:01, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Yanes wrote:
>>
>> Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" for a
>> company, but is one of the best warranties to offer a complete open
>> source project.
>>
>> Besides, it would be a sig
On 24 March 2010 18:56, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 3/24/2010 10:38, Adrian Yanes wrote:
>>
>> For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
>> default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in
>> the MeeGo project.
>
> how is all of this different from the ha
On Tue, 3/23/10, Clint Christopher Cañada wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Doesn't Qt's web component use webkit integration? Why doesn't Meego use
> that one, since the Meego UI Toolkit would be based on Qt as stated in the
> architecture layout? Nokia uses webkit on their symbian smartphones as well,
>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Yanes wrote:
>
> Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" for a
> company, but is one of the best warranties to offer a complete open
> source project.
>
> Besides, it would be a signal of commitment with the community, and it
> will enc
On 24 March 2010 18:39, Nils Faerber wrote:
> Wichmann, Mats D schrieb:
>> meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
>>> For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
>>> default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in the
>>> MeeGo project.
>>>
>>> Maybe the social
On 3/24/2010 11:10, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in the
MeeGo project.
Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" fo
On 3/24/2010 10:38, Adrian Yanes wrote:
For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in
the MeeGo project.
how is all of this different from the hardware enabling flow already
established on meego.com ???
On 24 March 2010 18:10, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
>> For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
>> default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in the
>> MeeGo project.
>>
>> Maybe the social contract sounds very free-sof
Wichmann, Mats D schrieb:
> meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
>> For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
>> default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in the
>> MeeGo project.
>>
>> Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" for a
meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote:
> For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
> default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in the
> MeeGo project.
>
> Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" for a
> company, but is one of the bes
For this reason a social contract could help us, establishing a
default requirements if you want to integrate a component/driver in
the MeeGo project.
Maybe the social contract sounds very free-software "fanatic" for a
company, but is one of the best warranties to offer a complete open
source pro
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, fpp wrote:
> True also, but only on N900/Maemo5. On the N8x0/Maemo4 platform,
> where the gecko-based Micro-B is very slow and kludgy, Tear is a
> real screamer, fast and slick. It is only less "usable and as well
> productized" because it is a one-man effort in POC
On 03/24/10 09:34, George Matveev wrote:
Rather typical ("believers" versus facts) message.
The key point was:
selection is best on available benchmarks (Acid3, SunSpider, etc).
And best (platform) == popular among developers/distros and reliable.
To get a feeling how GNU/Linux Debian is posi
Rather typical ("believers" versus facts) message.
The key point was:
selection is best on available benchmarks (Acid3, SunSpider, etc).
And best (platform) == popular among developers/distros and reliable.
To get a feeling how GNU/Linux Debian is positioned among others
just open this page:
h
I think that the target is that "reference devices" would have all drivers
open, to establish the driver structure for the category and then vendors,
technology providers could change to other drivers maintaining the API´s and
structure.
Mikk0 Terh0
On 3/22/10 6:07 PM, "ext Turunen Tuukka"
2010/3/24 George Matveev
>
> they do not care
> much about Acid3 test (100/100 achieved by WebKit and Opera on the same day -
> 26March2008, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3) or SunSpider tests (with
> screenshots forwarded to them)
>
The Acid tests are particular annoyance of mine. It's noth
On 3/24/2010 7:47, George Matveev wrote:
Hi,
this browser *engine* question was already touched upon many times
here and it is certainly puzzling and deserves attention of those who are
responsible for (architectural) decision making in this project
(hopefully Intel team is reading this).
I'm
2010/3/24 George Matveev
>
[snip interesting insights]
>
> The end result - very poor browser performance on all Tablets
> (Loading objects, Loading objects, with complete freeze of UI),
> frustrated customers and ultimately the failure of the platform
> (since for most users browser is most popul
Hi,
this browser *engine* question was already touched upon many times
here and it is certainly puzzling and deserves attention of those who are
responsible for (architectural) decision making in this project
(hopefully Intel team is reading this).
My *personal* impression (as someone who was dir
2010/3/24 Liu, Raymond :
>
> So, how can I make it built?
You could build the package with "n900" passed to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
and test it with your N900 (requires libdui from extras-devel) or if
you don't want to create the package you could take a look at
debian/rules about the available switches
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:12:21 +0100, fpp writes:
> True also, but only on N900/Maemo5. On the N8x0/Maemo4 platform, where
> the gecko-based Micro-B is very slow and kludgy, Tear is a real
> screamer, fast and slick. It is only less "usable and as well
> productized" because it is a one-man effort
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
>> Fennec (or really Firefox Mobile) is popular, fast
>
> Two jokes in one sentence.
> Have you ever tried Fennec 1.0 actually on the N900? It is _very, very,
> very_ slow, compared to the builtin browser (which is also gecko based,
> btw). I
>-Original Message-
>From: Robin Bate Boerop [mailto:robin.bateboe...@collabora.co.uk]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:13 AM
>To: Arjan van de Ven
>Cc: Wu, Yong; meego-dev@meego.com
>Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] The nativer rendering model proposal in Fennec
>
>On 23/03/10 11:48 AM, Arjan v
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:41:55 +0100, Jeremiah Foster
writes:
> On Mar 23, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/2010 22:53, Wu, Yong wrote:
>>> Background:
>>> Fennec uses a different rendering model as Firefox,
>>
>> I would be seriously concerned about using either Firefox or
> When I try to build it, it fails with:
>widgets/layoutmenu.cpp:25:29: error: DuiControlPanelIf: No such file or
>directory
>
>And it seems to me DuicontrolPanelIf is not available from libdui in the
>latest commit
>
>And then I check the control file, I think libduicontrolpanel is a stand
Em Quarta-feira 24. Março 2010, às 04.12.56, Rusty Lynch escreveu:
> I don't think the warning has anything to do with the content (i.e. your
> specific signal), but to the
> /QDBusConnectionInterface/::/serviceOwnerChanged/ method provided by
> dbus. I can see that qt4 is taking advantage of t
Hi
I can see that duikeyboard was released at
http://qt.gitorious.org/maemo-6-ui-framework/duikeyboard
When I try to build it, it fails with:
widgets/layoutmenu.cpp:25:29: error: DuiControlPanelIf: No such file or
directory
And it seems to me DuicontrolPanelIf is not available
34 matches
Mail list logo
