On 8/13/2010 8:28 PM, Alistair Buxton wrote:
>
> The problem is I don't know how to tell OBS to rebuild all the
> packages without using prebuilt Meego RPMs to do it - all the
> existing documentation is geared towards someone who wants to build a
> single package against an already bootstrapped
On 08/13/2010 03:36 PM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
if there is not a really clear official response to all
this mess, I don't see any future to Meego. I expected to see a open
distribution able to find a major place into the future market of
devices that converge the desktop and the mobile of
On 08/13/2010 03:31 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
Excerpts from Ware, Ryan R's message of Fri Aug 13 23:20:18 +0100 2010:
True, but the kernels you use now undoubtedly use features of the
instruction set that are not available on older systems. Would you like
us to eliminate those as well? Where i
On Saturday 14. August 2010 00.35.59 Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Thiago Macieira a écrit :
> > On Saturday 14. August 2010 00.04.48 Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >> Sorry but I perfectly live for years with machines that have kernel and
> >> xorg stuff without any SSSE3 instruction. And I a
On Friday 13 August 2010 23:11:52 Ware, Ryan R wrote:
> On 8/13/10 2:53 PM, "Robin Burchell" wrote:
> >Given that MeeGo is arriving a bit late to this game, I think this is
> >something that can be ill-afforded, personally: issues like this aren't
> >going to help us gain developer mindshare. At a
Ware, Ryan R a écrit :
On 8/13/10 2:53 PM, "Robin Burchell" wrote:
Hi,
Excerpts from Jean-Christian de Rivaz's message of Fri Aug 13 21:33:18
+0100 2010:
Agreed, it didn't have much to do about SSE3, but when the accelerated
graphics portion takes over, _that_ is the part it shows up.
Again
Thiago Macieira a écrit :
On Saturday 14. August 2010 00.04.48 Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Sorry but I perfectly live for years with machines that have kernel and
xorg stuff without any SSSE3 instruction. And I am pretty sure that I am
not the only one.
Including low-powered processors lik
Excerpts from Ware, Ryan R's message of Fri Aug 13 23:20:18 +0100 2010:
> True, but the kernels you use now undoubtedly use features of the
> instruction set that are not available on older systems. Would you like
> us to eliminate those as well? Where is that line of, "Which subset of
> the mode
On Saturday 14. August 2010 00.04.48 Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Sorry but I perfectly live for years with machines that have kernel and
> xorg stuff without any SSSE3 instruction. And I am pretty sure that I am
> not the only one.
Including low-powered processors like the Atom, without out
On 8/13/10 3:04 PM, "Jean-Christian de Rivaz" wrote:
>Greg KH a écrit :
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> The booting process has been analyzed by many peoples the last
> couple of years. I have not read all of there conclusions, but from
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Excerpts from Greg KH's message of Fri Aug 13 22:14:19 +0100 2010:
> > And still I fail to see why you are trying to compare MeeGo to Ubuntu.
> > If you like Ubuntu, it's there for you to use, no one is forcing you to
> > use MeeGo,
On 8/13/10 2:53 PM, "Robin Burchell" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Excerpts from Jean-Christian de Rivaz's message of Fri Aug 13 21:33:18
>+0100 2010:
>> > Agreed, it didn't have much to do about SSE3, but when the accelerated
>> > graphics portion takes over, _that_ is the part it shows up.
>>
>> Again, you f
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
The booting process has been analyzed by many peoples the last
couple of years. I have not read all of there conclusions, but from
what I remember, reducing the I/O activity (in number and in
latency) was
Excerpts from Greg KH's message of Fri Aug 13 22:14:19 +0100 2010:
> And still I fail to see why you are trying to compare MeeGo to Ubuntu.
> If you like Ubuntu, it's there for you to use, no one is forcing you to
> use MeeGo, right?
Ah, but there's the rub: if developers can't use it, they can't
Hi,
Excerpts from Jean-Christian de Rivaz's message of Fri Aug 13 21:33:18 +0100
2010:
> > Agreed, it didn't have much to do about SSE3, but when the accelerated
> > graphics portion takes over, _that_ is the part it shows up.
>
> Again, you failed to list a single Meego package that will not su
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:27:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:53:09PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
This was the Meego decision, without the community, to not be based
on a upstream distribution to solve this ki
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:27:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:53:09PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>
> >>This was the Meego decision, without the community, to not be based
> >>on a upstream distribution to solve this kind of
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>The booting process has been analyzed by many peoples the last
> >>couple of years. I have not read all of there conclusions, but from
> >>what I remember, reducing the I/O activity (in number and in
> >>latency) was a far
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
This is the way open source projects
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:53:09PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
This was the Meego decision, without the community, to not be based
on a upstream distribution to solve this kind of issue. Several of
us have warned at that time that this will be a big wast of time.
The
On Aug 9, 2010, at 11:57, Jan-Simon Möller wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> There will be a meeting about the toolchain/sdk/cross-compilers on
I'm sorry I couldn't attend this meeting. Are there any meeting minutes, IRC
log, or similar?
Thanks!
Jeremiah
___
M
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> >>>On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> >>>This is the way open source projects are
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:53:09PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>
> This was the Meego decision, without the community, to not be based
> on a upstream distribution to solve this kind of issue. Several of
> us have warned at that time that this will be a big wast of time.
> The argument w
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
[snap]
I guess people want the official OBS to have the generic i686 target
s
On 13 August 2010 20:12, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Alistair Buxton wrote:
>
>> You show a prjconf for Meego. I already have this, and have loaded it
>> into my OBS server. According to the documentation on Meego wiki I
>> still need to use obs_mirror_project to mirr
'MeeGo is the community' and is helping support Meego though Forum
Triage, the MeeGo Greeters program, new platforms, raising bug reports,
solving big reports etc.
We are all in this together paid/unpaid, Nokia/Intel affiliated or not.
vgrade
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:32:21PM
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
This is the way open source projects are supposed to work. The
people who start the project pick a manageable set of hardware to
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Alistair Buxton wrote:
You show a prjconf for Meego. I already have this, and have loaded it
into my OBS server. According to the documentation on Meego wiki I
still need to use obs_mirror_project to mirror the Meego files.
(http://wiki.meego.com/Build_Infrastructure/Sysad
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
> >>On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
> [snap]
> >>I guess people want the official OBS to have the generic i686 target
> >>so it b
On 8/13/2010 11:32 AM, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
[snap]
I guess people want the official OBS to have the generic i686 target
so it becomes a supported Architecture.
On 13 August 2010 19:13, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
> Maybe something like this:
>
>
> http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-developer-tools/obs-project-config/blobs/master/MeeGo:1.0:Core
You show a prjconf for Meego. I already have this, and have loaded it
into my OBS server. According to the
Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
[snap]
I guess people want the official OBS to have the generic i686 target
so it becomes a supported Architecture.
Are you willing to "support" it? If so, great, but
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Alistair Buxton wrote:
On 13 August 2010 18:26, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
If "the community" is serious about supporting a non-Core-2 arch, then I
would suggest that they set up their own OBS and demonstrate just how
serious they are about supporting it. As far as
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/13/2010 9:01 AM, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
>>
>> I guess people want the official OBS to have the generic i686 target
>> so it becomes a supported Architecture.
>>
>> The logic is valid, this is a community project, why does the x86 port
On 13 August 2010 18:26, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> If "the community" is serious about supporting a non-Core-2 arch, then I
> would suggest that they set up their own OBS and demonstrate just how
> serious they are about supporting it. As far as I can tell, even OBS is in
> Gitorious... s
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
If it's because of the lack of support then why is the answer not
something like - if there are people from the community willing to do
it then we'll add the target on the internal OBS
One reason: because "people from the community" is hard to
de
> your statement keeps being incorrect. the x86 port draws the minimum bar at
> the Core2 instruction set, not the Atom one.
Don't they use the same instruction set? What is the difference?
> (Core2 is a 2006/2007 chip, not super recent by any stretch of imagination)
>
> what is generic i686? Fed
heya, you are an open source activist from nokia and want to push the meego OS,
not only that android from last quarter rised from 1,7 % marketshare
to 17 % marketshare
(and blackberry has 18 %, while nokia struggles for 42 %)
but as well that android is now bundled over the "backdoor" - how
newspa
On Aug 13, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Randolph Dohm wrote:
> Hi Quim
>
> is it true that intel in in discussions with nintendo to bring out a
> mobile phone with a nintendo portable game pad phone?
> http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/psp-mockupengadget.jpg
> http://www.engadget.com/20
I am porting MeeGo on Devkit 8000. In Gst-launch, able to execute 'ogg'
files sucessfully. but i am unable to execute the Mpeg4 using OMX component.
In boot args 'video=omapfb:vram:2M,vram:4M'. In kernel i am loading
dspbridge driver
#modprobe dspbridge
#modprobe bridgedriver
#./cexec /lib/dsp/b
Hi Quim
is it true that intel in in discussions with nintendo to bring out a
mobile phone with a nintendo portable game pad phone?
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/08/psp-mockupengadget.jpg
http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/11/exclusive-sony-ericsson-to-introduce-android-3-0-gaming
On 8/13/2010 9:01 AM, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
I guess people want the official OBS to have the generic i686 target
so it becomes a supported Architecture.
The logic is valid, this is a community project, why does the x86 port
only support the Intel atom? If it's just the speed then we could just
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
> On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >> Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> >> >On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> >> >This is the way open s
On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>> Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
>> >On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
>> >This is the way open source projects are supposed to work. The
>> >people who start the project p
> - Original message -
> From: "Jean-Christian de Rivaz"
> To: "Development for the MeeGo Project (discussion list)"
>
> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] non SSSE3 MeeGo
> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:37:04 +0200
>
>
>Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> > On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wr
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> >On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> >This is the way open source projects are supposed to work. The
> >people who start the project pick a manageable set of hardware to
> >get us s
That was the point of the wiki page to provide some bullet points for
further work.
The discussions and blog post have done the trick and gavanised some people
into doing something.
The maemo obs (OBS3) has been as busy as ive seen it, which has caused its
own problems. Roll on OBS2.
Vgrade
On
Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
This is the way open source projects are supposed to work. The people who start the project pick a manageable set of hardware to get us started just like when Linus only supported 386 with AT drives in the first version of
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> On 12/08/10 00:06, martin brook wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a lively discussion on #meego
>> (http://mg.pov.lt/meego-irclog/%23meego.2010-08-11.log.html from 21:17)
>> I have created a wiki page to further community developmet of a non
>> SSSE3 M
On 8/13/2010 1:35 AM, vinod wrote:
Hi I am trying to integrate aegis Security framework into the N900
kernel. Wihle building the validator module I get following error.
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to
On 13 Aug 2010, at 14:41, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> Bug 5069[1] has some details on how to log debugging messages from
> wpa_supplicant.
Thanks
--
Glen Gray
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/me
Hi Vinod,
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 10:35 +0200, ext vinod wrote:
> Hi I am trying to integrate aegis Security framework into the N900
> kernel. Wihle building the validator module I get following error.
Can you point me to location where I can get the aegis patches and try
compiling it out for N900
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Glen Gray wrote:
Hey Guys,
I've noticed that some users can often have wifi problems.
_BuBU on IRC informed that if he ran wpa_supplicant then
things worked.
I've looked at my unit and I can see wpa_supplicant
running, but I can't see what's launching it. Any info ??
On 13 Aug 2010, at 14:32, Carsten Munk wrote:
> 2010/8/13 Glen Gray :
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> I've noticed that some users can often have wifi problems. _BuBU on IRC
>> informed that if he ran wpa_supplicant then things worked.
>>
>> I've looked at my unit and I can see wpa_supplicant running, but
2010/8/13 Glen Gray :
> Hey Guys,
>
> I've noticed that some users can often have wifi problems. _BuBU on IRC
> informed that if he ran wpa_supplicant then things worked.
>
> I've looked at my unit and I can see wpa_supplicant running, but I can't see
> what's launching it. Any info ???
To my kn
Hey Guys,
I've noticed that some users can often have wifi problems. _BuBU on IRC
informed that if he ran wpa_supplicant then things worked.
I've looked at my unit and I can see wpa_supplicant running, but I can't see
what's launching it. Any info ???
--
Glen Gray
_
Hi Robin,
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:53 +0100, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hi Cornelius,
>
> Excerpts from Cornelius Hald's message of Sun Jul 04 13:04:58 +0100 2010:
> > Here[1] are some screen shots of running a GTK+ application
> > (xfce4-about) on MeeGo/Handset. If mcompositor and mdecorator are bo
Hi,
> I found binary rpm qt-x11-4.7.0~prerelease-6.15.armv7l.rpm at
> http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/1.0.80/daily/core/repos/armv7l/packages/armv7l/,
http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/1.0.80/daily/core/repos/source/qt-4.7.0~prerelease-6.18.src.rpm
Cheers,
Fathi
__
2010/8/13 Francisco Javier Cuadrado :
> Hi!
>
> Sometime ago I created a mock chroot using meego core repository to
> build some packages, but today I've tried to use it again and yum
> doesn't work with that repo, it shows a lot of dependency problems,
> missing packages and non existent package g
Hi!
Sometime ago I created a mock chroot using meego core repository to
build some packages, but today I've tried to use it again and yum
doesn't work with that repo, it shows a lot of dependency problems,
missing packages and non existent package groups.
Does anyone know what it's happened?
Tha
Hi all,
I found binary rpm qt-x11-4.7.0~prerelease-6.15.armv7l.rpm at
http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/1.0.80/daily/core/repos/armv7l/packages/armv7l/
,
But corresponding souce rpm is not present.
Please let mw know the link for source rpm link for qt-x11-4.7.0~prerelease
package.
Regards,
kuma
Auke Kok a écrit :
On 08/12/2010 12:33 PM, Alistair Buxton wrote:
no matter how much we lower the "baseline", there will always be more
people saying "but I have this CPU and that one is not supported".
At one point you have to say "stop", and disappoint people. You can't
satisfy everyone.
Hi I am trying to integrate aegis Security framework into the N900
kernel. Wihle building the validator module I get following error.
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
make[1]: `include/generated/mach-types.h' is up to date.
CALLscripts/checksyscalls
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:00:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:13:24AM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> > > Please express yours. Why do you feel you need these to be ioctls?
> > > What exactly are they doing? Where is the documentation for them all?
>
> You forgot to answer this.
64 matches
Mail list logo
