[MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset - (was: Re: Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?)

2011-05-03 Thread Robin Burchell
On 03/05/11 09:21, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote: Yes, they are in Harmattan. Does they have real-world use just depends that do you like offer optimum user experience for certain class of devices. Intel components offers best match with Intel's tablet UX, Harmattan components offer best user

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset - (was: Re: Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?)

2011-05-03 Thread Tom Swindell
Though I agree with most of what you're saying, I think a lot of app developers, at least the professional kind, will probably end up using pure QML based UXs tailored to their apps. MeeGo/Qt/Harmatten Components I suppose give certain developers/applications the ability to camouflage themselves

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo vs Harmattan; Tablet vs Handset - (was: Re: Qt/QML or Meego Touch Framework?)

2011-05-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Tuesday, 3 de May de 2011, às 13:41:20, Tom Swindell escreveu: I think from my perspective, I'd probably be writing several QML UXs for my apps anyway, one for tablets (large screen) and another for handsets, the main reason being, though a perfect UX designed in QML could be scalable