Hi Henrik,
could you please tell me how can i remove the dead node from the pool,
or can you provide me any documentation of BeIT memcached client so
that i understand it easily.
Actually, In BeIT client there is method to detech the status of the
host, i want to remove it from the socket pool
First, check SocketPool.cs, around line 160. That's the code that fires if
it failed to open a socket. You want to check if
deadEndPointSecondsUntilRetry is larger than some sort of threshhold (A
minute or so, you don't want to remove servers the first time they fail, you
can have short temporary
All memcached clients handle the distribution of items between servers, you
just need to tell it which machines are in the pool, and never worry about
where specific items end up. Normally you really shouldn't worry about that
sort of thing. Good memcached clients offer you ways to choose failover
in a
10+ server pool.
- Steve
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Henrik Schröder wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:13:23 +0200
From: Henrik Schröder skro...@gmail.com
Reply-To: memcached@googlegroups.com
To: memcached@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: memcached failover solution?
All memcached clients handle
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:34, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
http://blogs.sun.com/trond/date/20090625
^ client side replication.
I like this and feel it's more powerful, since tt scales past two severs
implicitly, and you can enable/disable it per key or key type. So instead
of
Thanks to All,
In a web farm where two memcached server is hosted separately, when
one server is down could all request served from server 2
automatically or we need to remove the dead node explicitly from the
client?
I have tested a scenario:
Key1, Data1 Cached on Server1
Key2, Data2 Cached
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Henrik Schröder skro...@gmail.com wrote:
How it works depends on which client you use. If you use the BeITMemcached
client, when one instance goes down it will internally mark it as dead,
start writing about it in the error log, and all requests that would end
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 03:34, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
http://blogs.sun.com/trond/date/20090625
^ client side replication.
I like this and feel it's more powerful, since tt scales past two severs
implicitly, and you can enable/disable it per key or key type. So instead
of
well this is a bit like mixing together couple of things, i thing if you are
having multiple memcached instance you have to handle it from your app or
write a proxy what checks the memcached servers and distributes the load and
removing the dead one from the pool like load balancers do with http
On Oct 18, 12:22 am, moses wejuli m.wej...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Dustin.
I guess what i'm really askin is: would you recommend using memcached for
session management in PHP.. the PHP extension for memcache has got a
facility for manging sessions. This behaviour (using memcache for
On Oct 18, 1:27 pm, Ren jared.willi...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Oct 18, 12:22 am, moses wejuli m.wej...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Dustin.
I guess what i'm really askin is: would you recommend using memcached for
session management in PHP.. the PHP extension for memcache has got a
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 00:47, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Anyone interested in getting one of the windows clients to support
libmemcached, or at least the same replication method that the windows
client uses?
What do you mean? What would be required for this?
/Henrik Schröder
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Henrik Schr?der wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 00:47, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
Anyone interested in getting one of the windows clients to support
libmemcached, or at least the same replication method that the windows
client uses?
What do
Hi Henrick,
When you say:
If your application requires that all memcached instances are up
and running all the time, it's pretty likely that you are doing something
wrong, that you are using memcached in a way it was not intended for.
Does this mean you cannot use memcache for session
Thanks Dustin.
I guess what i'm really askin is: would you recommend using memcached for
session management in PHP.. the PHP extension for memcache has got a
facility for manging sessions. This behaviour (using memcache for session
mgmt) can be turned on in the PHP ini file.
I know/believe C is
On Oct 17, 4:22 pm, moses wejuli m.wej...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Dustin.
I guess what i'm really askin is: would you recommend using memcached for
session management in PHP.. the PHP extension for memcache has got a
facility for manging sessions. This behaviour (using memcache for
the article is very good, incisive and convincing -- in summary, it requires
that you treat sessions as any other data -- stored in the DB, and cached in
m/cache, blah blah blah
i suppose i'll have to implemnt it first before i can come up with better
questions -- for the time being though, many
Hi,
I am using memcached on windows server 2003 in a web cluster
environment setup through NLB (Network load balancer) and using two
different memcached server for caching, using BeIT Memcached client.
I want to know if memcached doesn't provide failover explicitly than
is there any way to
Hi Adi,
Why do you want failover? It's just a cache, so your application should be
able to run ok if part of the cache cluster is unavailable, you would
experience a slightly higher cache miss ratio.
If your application requires that all memcached instances are up and running
all the time, it's
19 matches
Mail list logo
