Hello,
We recently implemented memcached to keep our database from crashing
because of too many connections to it.
Now we have two memcached servers which handle the DB-access and as long as
both servers are online we encounter no problems. However when one of the
goes down. Half our users
2012/10/16 SAE simsimil...@googlemail.com
Hello,
Hi
We recently implemented memcached to keep our database from crashing
because of too many connections to it.
Now we have two memcached servers which handle the DB-access and as long
as both servers are online we encounter no problems.
garulf ,
Memcache doesn't automatically comes with Replication facility (High
Avialibility) , i recomend you to use Repcache Patch on top of your
existing mecached for obtaining Replication of data
within your servers .
The only issue i see is that Repcached only works / Successfully
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Memcache doesn't automatically comes with Replication facility (High
Avialibility) , i recomend you to use Repcache Patch on top of your existing
mecached for obtaining Replication of data
within your servers .
The only
Hi,
You can find it at:
https://github.com/rajiv-kapoor/memcached/tree/bagLRU
Let me know if you have any problems.
thanks,
\rajiv
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:05:02 PM UTC-7, 连海东 wrote:
Hi rajiv:
I didn't find the badLRU branch on 1.6 repo, where can I get your branch?
Thanks
在
You should take the following into account:
1. LB will add another network hop and therefore extra latency for each
request
2. Depending on the throughput of your Memcached servers, LB will probably
be the bottleneck (unless you are using HW based LB which is too expensive)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are going to be stuck with this restriction - and have to build
your own fail-over, is there any advantage to using memcache compared
to redis with its much larger feature set?
I agree. If you need durability
Thank you very much .
Another question , If i dont use a LoadBalancer , Will the two Memcache
Servers (Server1 and Server2) with repcache installed on them , will they
be like active active cluster ??
Means , will the load (requests from memcache client ) would be
distributed between
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 294 by ke...@tellapart.com: segfault under low memory conditions
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=294
Under certain low memory conditions, memcached can segfault. I cannot
reproduce this manually, but
I am newbie to Memcached, and I have a questions about cluster deployment:
does memcached support data synchronization betwean cluster nodes? if it
does, how can I determine the scope of synchronization?
Thanks in advance.
10 matches
Mail list logo