On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are going to be stuck with this restriction - and have to build > your own fail-over, is there any advantage to using memcache compared > to redis with its much larger feature set?
I agree. If you need durability (i.e. if it would be a big problem to lose some of the data in memcached), then memcached is the wrong tool for you. It aims to provide a level of failover that allows memcached requests to continue to work, but does not aim to maintain data. - Perrin
