I wouldn't worry about it. It is a lot easier to catch up double-checks
than it is to get ahead doing first times.
Carleton Garrison
- Original Message -
From: "Daran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:37 PM
I did a Windows Update.
Checking Task Manager shows Prime95 getting 99% CPU, but a EXPLORER.EXE
process keeps jumping up to get 1% which is activity I don't remember from
before.
- Original Message -
From: "Jud McCranie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Carleton Garrison&q
I have a Dell Inspiron 8000 with a ATI Mobility M4 which I'm pretty sure is
PCI.
- Original Message -
From: "Jud McCranie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Carleton Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 10,
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 5:52 AM
Subject: Mersenne: timings
> Well, this means almost 58% slower than expected.
Well, I hope you figure it out because the same has happened to me. Have
you done any Windows
point you can Prime95 service
install again.
I don't know, it is hard to tell. I don't think your problems happen when
doing it by hand, so something must be wrong with the image?
Carleton Garrison,
#105 www.teamprimerib.com
- Original Message -
From: "Steinar H. Gunderso
LL-test if someone else
> finds a factor later, or if two other independant checks prove your
> result to be wrong.
Me too. I understand that George's top producer page does this, while the
PrimeNet stat page does not. PrimeNet really needs this capability.
Carleton Garrison LL#16
> At 04:07 PM 9/30/2001 -0700, Daniel Swanson wrote:
> >I went through the Cleared Exponents
> >report looking for other examples of factors found during
> double-checks that
> >should have been found during the initial factorization.
> > 5977297 53 DF6726544627832489
> > 6019603 57 DF
a that would allow me to compare factoring
contributions as well?
Thanks,
Carleton Garrison
_
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
ss of credit. Is this up-to-date stat policy? Does
this apply only to LL stats or is it possible to lose credit for factoring if
later factoring proves more successful? How many such scenarios are
there?
Thanks,
Carleton Garrison
How did you get -1?
Lucas-Lehmer Test: For p odd, the Mersenne number 2p-1 is prime if and only
if 2p-1 divides S(p-1) where S(n+1) = S(n)2-2, and S(1) = 4.
You missed the premise "for p odd".
And even so, S(p-1)/(2p-1) with p = 2; S(1)/3 = 4/3.
Carleton
- Original Message -
From: "N
red
to wait for 190 days, but 16 days later I'm at 211. I don't think I'm going
to be happy with 360 days let alone something along the line of 1168!
Carleton
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Kriesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CARLETON GARRISON" &l
George,
> I'll see if I can work out a solution with Scott. A minimum solution
would
> have
> the server return whether or not the exponent has already had P-1
factoring
> done. A better solution would include giving CPU credit for P-1
> factoring and making it a separate work type.
Right
TECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: P-1
> > From: "CARLETON GARRISON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I honestly thought that the long term goal (maybe not by this panel but
for
> > others) w
I honestly thought that the long term goal (maybe not by this panel but for
others) was to factor all these numbers and that we were setting/recording a
lower boundary for that effort.
Carleton Garrison
- Original Message -
From: "Brian J. Beesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Daran,
I waited a few days for someone more able than myself to reply. They
must all be busy, so I'll give a response as best I can...
I read somewhere that factoring has a success rate of 20%.
Version 19 fixed a bug that was underestimating the time necessary, in
the early stages
Daran,
Again I'm not the most qualified person to reply but...
The name of the game is validate - by duplication. You cannot make a
case without duplicating the result. This is to safeguard against the many
gremlins that can occur - faulty overclocked CPUs, etc. If someone finds a
fac
Russ that IS an impressive milestone! I've only been processing 9 days but
we all have to start somewhere. Tell you what, check out
http://arstechnica.infopop.net/OpenTopic/page?q=Y&a=tpc&s=50009562&f=1220975
61&m=3680928671&p=1. We are looking for some "founding fathers". It'd be
like getting
17 matches
Mail list logo
