Re: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]

1999-06-05 Thread Paul Derbyshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, you've dropped the annoying Mandelbrot quote, but you're still trying to stir up trouble on my favorite mailing list. I'm not trying to stir up trouble. However, between your insulting of my sig file (absent temporarily, due to my ISP's mail trouble and my

RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]

1999-06-05 Thread Rick Pali
From: Paul Derbyshire and your accusing me of flame-baiting, I begin to suspect that you, who I formerly had not even noticed, are in fact trying to flame-bait the list. I don't think that anyone's trying to flame anyone at all, but I can't Evidently you haven't been monitoring the list.

Re: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]

1999-06-05 Thread Joe Decker
Paul Derbyshire wrote: Sounds like a lot to me. This CPU I have can finish LL tests in that kind of time, except that I have a habit of using it for other things a lot of the time. It may seem like a long time to you, but I've been interested in Mersenne Primes as an observer since around

RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]

1999-06-05 Thread lrwiman
All, alright, everybody break it up! Well, you've dropped the annoying Mandelbrot quote, but you're still trying to stir up trouble on my favorite mailing list. I'm not trying to stir up trouble. However, between your insulting of my sig file (absent temporarily, due to my ISP's mail

Re: [RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]]

1999-06-05 Thread Paul Derbyshire
"Rick Pali" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that anyone's trying to flame anyone at all, but I can't [the rest is missing] ??? ... might it not be a good idea to ask to be apprised of the situation before accusing the very people who make all this possible of being "completely

RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]

1999-06-05 Thread Aaron Blosser
Paul Derbyshire wrote: Sounds like a lot to me. This CPU I have can finish LL tests in that kind of time, except that I have a habit of using it for other things a lot of the time. It may seem like a long time to you, but I've been interested in Mersenne Primes as an observer since

Re: [RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]]

1999-06-05 Thread Paul Derbyshire
Here are my ideas on bugs: Bugs happen! They're a fact of life, omnipresent in all software. Showstopper bugs should not slip through testing and into release software. Bugs should allways be caught in the testing, but so often they aren't. Minor bugs yes, massive showstoppers no. In the

Re: [RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]]

1999-06-05 Thread Paul Derbyshire
My motivation is to help. This spectacular bug caused some of my help to have been wasted. Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

Re: [RE: [Re: [Re: Mersenne: Serious problems with v.18]]]

1999-06-05 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Sat, Jun 05, 1999 at 11:07:04PM -0600, Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erm? Regardless of when I found out, it remains a fact that to release non-beta software to the general public without a thorough testing *is* a rash act. The software *was* tested - the testing missed this