On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:29:51AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> This implements the mbox.gz retrieval. I didn't want to deal
> with HTML nor figuring out how to expose more elements,
> yet; but I figure mbox.gz is the most important.
>
> Now deployed on 80x24.org/lore:
>
>
Eric Wong wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> > I can't easily test this, because lore is currently mostly on 1.9 and the
> > patch doesn't cleanly apply to that tree. However, I will be happy to test
> > it
> > out once 2.0 is out and we've updated to it on our systems.
>
> Fwiw, master is
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> I can't easily test this, because lore is currently mostly on 1.9 and the
> patch doesn't cleanly apply to that tree. However, I will be happy to test it
> out once 2.0 is out and we've updated to it on our systems.
Fwiw, master is good on Linux for mail.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:29:51AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Per-thread search is something I've wanted for a while, anyways,
> > so I think I'll do /$MSGID/?q= in between ongoing work for
>
> This implements the mbox.gz retrieval. I didn't want to deal
> with HTML nor figuring out how to
Eric Wong wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> > However, if you do want to add ability to cheaply do a "give me just the
> > newest messages in this thread since this datetime", that would be great for
> > my needs. :)
>
> Per-thread search is something I've wanted for a while, anyways,
> so
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> I'm fine with either of these, and just to stress, it's not really blocking
> anything I'm working on -- bugbot is in initial rollout stages, so while the
> number of tracked bugs/threads remains low, even if we re-download a hundred
> threads every 10 minutes, it's
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 10:08:30PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > I think this is a workable approach, but would require a reindex, right?
>
> Yes, it requires a reindex to take effect, which takes ~2 days
> on my lore mirror. The biggest problem is MUAs are likely to
> cull References: when
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 07:45:49PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > C) index References:/In-Reply-To: so searching `ref:$MSGID'
> >can work. This doesn't work for some MUAs and deep
> >threads, though.
>
> I think this is a workable approach, but would require a
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 07:45:49PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> C) index References:/In-Reply-To: so searching `ref:$MSGID'
>can work. This doesn't work for some MUAs and deep
>threads, though.
I think this is a workable approach, but would require a reindex, right?
-K
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:38:49PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > I thought about that, too; but I'm worried about having one-off
> > stuff that ends up needing to be supported indefinitely.
> >
> > JMAP for this would take more time, but I'd be more comfortable
> >
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:38:49PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> I thought about that, too; but I'm worried about having one-off
> stuff that ends up needing to be supported indefinitely.
>
> JMAP for this would take more time, but I'd be more comfortable
> carrying it long-term.
>
> I don't expect
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:10:49PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > > For the bugzilla integration work I'm doing, I need a way to check if
> > > there
> > > were any updates to a thread since the last check. Right now, I'm just
> > > grabbing the full thread, parsing it
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:10:49PM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > For the bugzilla integration work I'm doing, I need a way to check if there
> > were any updates to a thread since the last check. Right now, I'm just
> > grabbing the full thread, parsing it and seeing if there are any new
> >
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> Hello:
>
> For the bugzilla integration work I'm doing, I need a way to check if there
> were any updates to a thread since the last check. Right now, I'm just
> grabbing the full thread, parsing it and seeing if there are any new
> message-IDs that we don't know
Hello:
For the bugzilla integration work I'm doing, I need a way to check if there
were any updates to a thread since the last check. Right now, I'm just
grabbing the full thread, parsing it and seeing if there are any new
message-IDs that we don't know about, but it's very wasteful. Any way to
15 matches
Mail list logo
