Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-12 Thread Richard MacLemale
On 11/12/02 12:03 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > You better add WIN XP to the list. It has a lot of quirks and > inconsistencies compared to Win 98, ME, and 2000. For example, many system > file locations (paths) are different, and many registry entries are under > different (and unexpected) key

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-12 Thread Dar Scott
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 08:15 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: I don't know what gave me the idea that Mac did away with that. Hmm. I had my original computer set up that way, with OS 7.0 and OS 6.0 or some such thing. Interesting... That's how all of us have been doing dual boot with OS X

RE: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-12 Thread Yates, Glen
> If your Mac is fast enough, you can maybe get away with VPC. > Mine isn't... :) Well, actually I was talking about VPC for windows, since there is no processor emulation, there is very little speed hit. VPC for the mac is unacceptably slow for me. > I think you can get away with OS 9, OS X,

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread miscdas
Richard MacLemale writes: [snip] I don't think this is a black and white issue, like "If you can't test I'd test under OS 9.2.2, OS X, and Windows 98. I think you can get away with OS 9, OS X, and Win 98 if you want to develop for Mac and Windows. Richard MacLemale Network Administrator J. W

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
cteno4 wrote: > another reason I love MC since these issues on the dark side > are much, much fewer than other authoring systems! Terrabytes have been consumed by discussions among VB developers about how to avoid DLL conflicts, as have, to a lesser degree, ToolBook users. Meanwhile with MC we c

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread cteno4
One thing to keep in mind is the old permutation problem with drivers and hardware on PCs. yes you can boot multiple OSs on the same pc, but they will be the same hardware/driver permutations. Ive been bitten in the ass before (but rarely with MC) by certain driver/hardware permutations that we

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Richard Gaskin
Shari wrote: >> You can, Shari, although the way I've done it in the past is to partition a >> larger drive into multiple partitions and then install a different OS on >> each partition. Then use the Startup Disk control panel to pick which >> partition to start from. >> >> Ken Ray >> Sons of Thu

RE: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Shari
If your Mac is fast enough, you can maybe get away with VPC. Mine isn't... :) Seemed fast as all getout when I got it. Still fast to me, but by today's standards, probably not. I'm at 350 mhz on a G-3. -- --Shareware Games for the Mac-- http://www.gypsyware.com _

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Shari
You can, Shari, although the way I've done it in the past is to partition a larger drive into multiple partitions and then install a different OS on each partition. Then use the Startup Disk control panel to pick which partition to start from. Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software I don't know what g

RE: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Richard MacLemale
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Testing on multiple platforms > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:56:23 -0800 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> It does not matter which OS I have. My testing will always be on >> that

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Ken Ray
EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ - Original Message - From: "Shari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 7:28 PM Subject: Re: Testing on multiple platforms > >Shari, > >You need to make a distinc

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Shari
Shari, You need to make a distinction between "computers" and "operating systems". You can have one computer that runs many flavors of Windows through different means. For example, Windows has dual-boot option, enabling installing of a variety of OSs on a single drive, and SELECTION of which O

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Pierre Sahores
andu a écrit : > > --On Monday, November 11, 2002 20:39:49 +0100 Pierre Sahores > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > andu a écrit : > >> > > --snip-- > >> > >> The point here is resentment for change as was mentioned in a couple of > >> messages, not lack of solutions. My mac contains os 9.2.2, O

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread andu
--On Monday, November 11, 2002 20:39:49 +0100 Pierre Sahores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: andu a écrit : --snip-- The point here is resentment for change as was mentioned in a couple of messages, not lack of solutions. My mac contains os 9.2.2, OS X (Darwin), Linux on one drive with the op

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Pierre Sahores
andu a écrit : > --snip-- > > The point here is resentment for change as was mentioned in a couple of > messages, not lack of solutions. My mac contains os 9.2.2, OS X (Darwin), > Linux on one drive with the option of running os 9.2.2 within either Linux > or OS X. > --snip-- > > Regards, And

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Mark Luetzelschwab
de of things... -ml From: "Yates, Glen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Testing on multiple platforms Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:56:23 -0800 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It does not matter which OS I have. My t

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Byron
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 09:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shari writes: [snip] I have one OS. Some people have my OS, others do not. Unless you have 5 or 10 computers, you CANNOT test on all OS's. A Window's developer would need at least 4 to test on the various flavours of

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Dar Scott
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 08:56 AM, Yates, Glen wrote: A Window's developer would need at least 4 to test on the various flavours of Windows. Minimum. Or one copy of Connectix's Virtual PC. :-) And a fast PC or a very fast Mac. I use this both on PC and on Mac, but since my Mac is

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread andu
--On Monday, November 11, 2002 11:33:09 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shari writes: [snip] I have one OS. Some people have my OS, others do not. Unless you have 5 or 10 computers, you CANNOT test on all OS's. A Window's developer would need at least 4 to test on the various flavours

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread miscdas
Shari writes: [snip] I have one OS. Some people have my OS, others do not. Unless you have 5 or 10 computers, you CANNOT test on all OS's. A Window's developer would need at least 4 to test on the various flavours of Windows. Minimum. A Mac developer would need at least 3. Minimum.

RE: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Yates, Glen
> It does not matter which OS I have. My testing will always be on > that one specifically. Unless you have 5 or 10 computers, you CANNOT > test on all OS's. > > A Window's developer would need at least 4 to test on the various > flavours of Windows. Minimum. Or one copy of Connectix's Virt

Re: Testing on multiple platforms

2002-11-11 Thread Shari
A word of advice: If you plan to release software for various platforms, and provide features and support for those platforms, you'd better plan on owning those platforms. I have one OS. Some people have my OS, others do not. It has always been this way. Things change not only from platform t