4 pixel border. So I'll add that to the list as number
1:
1) Group rect visible rect if margin 0 and showborder is off.
2) ?
From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: borderwidthSolution?: effective rect
Last week we were discussing the relative merits of having one fixed
David Bovill wrote:
I think I may have missed a little of this thread, but I'd suggest that the
most important property to most people was the visible rect. In other
words the user usually want the rect so they can position the borders to
line up visually with other objects.
I haven't yet
Title: RE: borderwidthSolution?: effective rect
Actually, I believe it is the *margin* property that is set to 4 by default. My first action when making a group is to immediately set the margins of groupID to 0.
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http
Ken Ray wrote:
Actually, I believe it is the *margin* property that is set to 4 by default.
My first action when making a group is to immediately set the margins of
groupID to 0.
Correct -- good catch.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Multimedia Design and
Richard Gaskin wrote/ schreef:
I would like to propose that we consider adopting the effective rect,
which would return the complete rect of an object including any temporary
decorations like the focusBorder.
Would this be acceptable to the readers here (and more importantly, to
Scott)?
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sjoerd Op 't Land
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 7:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: borderwidthSolution?: effective rect
Richard Gaskin wrote/ schreef:
I would like to propose that we consider adopting the effective rect,
which
Last week we were discussing the relative merits of having one fixed rect
for a field regardless of the ephemeral focusBorder, or whether the
focusBorder should be included in the rect as it is in 2.4b4. There seemed
a consensus that a fixed rect was more useful than a dynamic one based on
this
