On Nov 19, 2004, at 2:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am investigating the options available for peer-to-peer messaging
and
direct data transfer for The Scripter's Scrapbook. If anyone has
experience in
sockets and would like to be involved, please contact me off-line at
[EMAIL PROT
I am investigating the options available for peer-to-peer messaging and
direct data transfer for The Scripter's Scrapbook. If anyone has experience in
sockets and would like to be involved, please contact me off-line at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hugh Senior
The Flexible Learning Compan
I have been using sockets successfully (in MC and RunRev) for quite a while
now...it is one of their strengths. Now I need to use datagram sockets, (in
particular 'broadcasting') and I am discovering that this seems to be very
different...and I cannot get datagram broadcasting working i
Haven't tracked this down yet... but in moving a simple http server
stack over to run under the Linux 2.4.3 engine - I get no connection.
The same stack serves up files fine with the 2.4.2 MacOs PPC version.
I note there have been some changes to the way datagram sockets work in
2.4.3:
> MetaCard 2.4.3 alpha 2 is now available in the directory
ft> p://ftp.metacard.com/MetaCard/2.4.3/
> See the README file in that directory for more information.
> Scott
Sorry Scott, but opening TCP sockets on MacOS PPC (OS 8.6) is still
broken...or have you severely changed some
Thanks for the socket references. I've got some homework to do.
Greg
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
There is a sockets example on the Runtime website, have a look at the user
contributions section on the page below.
http://www.runrev.com/revolution/developers/index.html
Cheers,
Rod
Rod McCall
Runtime Revolution Ltd, Edinburgh UK
www.runrev.com
- Original Message -
From: "Phil
Hi Greg,
There's a lot of info out there about sockets. Some of it can even be
understood by non-network-engineer types! No MetaTalk examples, but
you'll get it anyway.
Here's a nice definition:
http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/20.htm
You may gain more insight by comparing t
Hi Everyone,
Where can I find a primer on sockets, something like "Sockets for Dummies" with lots of MetaCard examples.
Regards,
Greg
Gregory Lypny
Associate Professor
John Molson School of Business
Concordia University
_
"Absence of evidence is
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 Rodney Tamblyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some socket questions:
> When using sockets to read and write I have been using the
> following approach: write the length of the packet on a line
> followed by the data, at receiving end read for one line, t
- Original Message -
From: "Rodney Tamblyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 10:08 PM
Subject: sockets
> I have been having fun working with sockets in Metacard, and in
general everything seems to work fine.
>
>
>From: Rodney Tamblyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: sockets
>Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:08:59 +1200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I have been having fun working with sockets in Metacard, and in
>general everything seem
I have been having fun working with sockets in Metacard, and in general everything
seems to work fine.
Some socket questions:
When using sockets to read and write I have been using the following approach: write
the length of the packet on a line followed by the data, at receiving end read for
CTED]
> Subject: Re: Interconnecting Metacard apps via sockets...
>
>
>
>
> > From: Geoff Canyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Interconnecting Metacard apps via sockets...
> >
> > At 10:04 PM +0100 8/14/01, David Bovill wrote:
> >>
> From: Geoff Canyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Interconnecting Metacard apps via sockets...
>
> At 10:04 PM +0100 8/14/01, David Bovill wrote:
>>>> I am looking for a way to interconnect apps running on the same machine (on
>>>> any platform)
At 10:04 PM +0100 8/14/01, David Bovill wrote:
>>> I am looking for a way to interconnect apps running on the same machine (on
>>> any platform), and thinking of using sockets. I will be programming the
>>> basic modules in MC, but want to leave the door open for modul
Second go at this one -:(
Given that a user is online - anyone know if it is possible/the pitfalls of
using sockets for Inter Application Communication (IAC) or just plain inter
stack communication?
Hope I'm not talking to myself here!
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/met
Thanks Richard,
the problem is not with how to use sockets in MC, more issue with using and
routing socket connections across a variety of platforms. Stuff like:
1) What problems should I expect trying to connect two apps on the same
machine (localhost)?
2) Do they have to be separate
David Bovill wrote:
> I am looking for a way to interconnect apps running on the same machine (on
> any platform), and thinking of using sockets. I will be programming the
> basic modules in MC, but want to leave the door open for modules to be coded
> in other languages, and on ot
I am looking for a way to interconnect apps running on the same machine (on
any platform), and thinking of using sockets. I will be programming the
basic modules in MC, but want to leave the door open for modules to be coded
in other languages, and on other machines...
Anyone got any tips
Hi all,
I recently tried supporting keep-alive sockets with my Metacard server app
(HTTP - based originally on metacard-httpd). However, I get strange behavior.
Frequently when a new request comes in, I get duplicate sockets (not always,
but usually within a few minutes and a couple dozen
Phew ;-) thought it was just me.
> There seems to be a problem downloading those files. BTW it looks better
> in Netscape Linux now.
>
> Andu
>
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
> Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
> Please send bug reports t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I see said the blind man ;-)
>
> ...as he picked up his hammer and saw...(think it only works if you say it and not
>read it) ;^P
>
> PS: If anyone is interested, mctools has an old Oracle SQL database connectivity
>solution for MetaCard. Code is available, h
I see said the blind man ;-)
...as he picked up his hammer and saw...(think it only works if you say it and not read it) ;^P
PS: If anyone is interested, mctools has an old Oracle SQL database connectivity solution for MetaCard. Code is available, hopefully someone can code it for mySQL.
Archi
> I would
> open datagram socket to host:port with message X
>
> and
>
> on X
> write tData to host:port
> close datagram socket host:port
> end X
>
> or something like that.
>
I see said the blind man ;-)
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xwor
Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> Just a few of questions:
>
> How do you stop accepting conections? I had a look at mchttpd and it seems
> like Andu is just closing all the open sockets but does this stop new ones
> from being opened?
As long as you don't clo
Hi All
Just a few of questions:
How do you stop accepting conections? I had a look at mchttpd and it seems
like Andu is just closing all the open sockets but does this stop new ones
from being opened?
Can someone please outline the syntax for sending a UPD datagram. The
documentation seems to
Title: sockets - sending email
attachments
I have merged
two sockets email scripts I after looking
through the
archives. I can get Andu's file attachment scripting
to work fine
except for attachments over 250k (approx) in size.
Smaller
attachments are sent just fine.
I'm posting
andu,
>
>
> Reading from the socket until empty is *not* the way to go. Try to
> device a protocol (say like http) where you give the server a more
> reliable parameter for its read, like the size of the message or some
> character that would mark the end of it.
> Also you can make use of "sock
jbv wrote:
>
> Hi boys & girls,
>
> Here comes the sockets thread again.
>
> I actually spent the afternoon scripting a small chat
> program under MC and it works very well between
> the various machines of our LAN (Macs, Win98 &
> Linux).
>
> Now I wa
- Original Message -
From: "jbv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: Sockets again
> Hi boys & girls,
>
> Here comes the sockets thread again.
>
> I actually spent the afternoon scripting a s
Hi boys & girls,
Here comes the sockets thread again.
I actually spent the afternoon scripting a small chat
program under MC and it works very well between
the various machines of our LAN (Macs, Win98 &
Linux).
Now I want to move to larger scale prof. projects :
basically a MC app runn
Robin-David Hammond wrote:
>
> It looks like the close sockets function does not accept the name of the socket,
> but the host:port pair. this would make opening multiple sockes to the same port
> rather difficult.
I'm not sure about 2.3.x but in 2.4 you can "number"
>
>On 3/23/01 2:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I've been seeing a lot of references to sockets on the list. This is one
>> topic (among many) that I am completely ignorant of. Can someone point me to
>> a book or site where I could read up on the
On 3/23/01 2:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been seeing a lot of references to sockets on the list. This is one
> topic (among many) that I am completely ignorant of. Can someone point me to
> a book or site where I could read up on then and how to use them?
Socket disc
>
>I've been seeing a lot of references to sockets on the list. This is one topic (among
many) that I am completely ignorant of. Can someone point me to a book or site where I
could read up on then and how to use them?
Unfortunately "sockets" hardly describes what it ac
I've been seeing a lot of references to sockets on the list. This is one topic (among
many) that I am completely ignorant of. Can someone point me to a book or site where
I could read up on then and how to use them?
Philip
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runre
> Collocation - there are quite a few major providers offering a
> dedicated raq
> server, running Linux for $99 a month.
I'm in ;-)
But there is also a cheaper company than this. For 25 pounds (after a setup
fee) a company named UK2.net will give you a dedicated 10.2 GB Cobalt Raq3
server. What
>> This is the sort of thing that you need to do with matching genetic
>> sequences, so I'm sure the algorithms are out there ...
>
> Sounds like a job for GREP! (which MetaCard does natively)
>
I think it's a bit more complicated than that -:) I mean before you start
testing you don't know wha
> What would be really nice is to have something which would analyse two
> text files and colourize the bits that differed.
BBEdit might be just what you need.
> This is the sort of thing that you need to do with matching genetic
> sequences, so I'm sure the algorithms are out there ...
Soun
-- MESSAGE metacard.v004.n219.8 ---
From: jbv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sockets vs. POST
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 16:23:44 +
>Actually, that's what I'm planing to do. I have a few pending
>projects for which the clients want a CD-ROM versio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> I recommend you duke it out with the CGI protocol some more before giving up on this
>relatively easy protocol. Unless, of course, you have some very special protocol
>needs that CGI is not designed to handle or to handle-well. IOW, with sockets, you
>could
> From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 12:44:10 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sockets vs. POST
>
>> What kind of trouble?
>> Trouble with extracting the posted data ?
>> Trou
1. Would it be any easier to take control over the whole transaction by
>> using sockets instead of relying on MC's POST? My first hunch is that it
>> would not...
>
> Your hunch is correct. Sockets are much more complicated because they are at a
> lower level of abstractio
ntrol over the whole transaction by
> using sockets instead of relying on MC's POST? My first hunch is that it
> would not...
Your hunch is correct. Sockets are much more complicated because they are at a lower
level of abstraction, e.g. more details to attend to than would normally be t
Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> While working on some routines to send POST data to CGIs, I'm having some
> trouble getting the data in the right format and it's raise two questions:
>
> 1. Would it be any easier to take control over the whole transaction by
> using socket
> From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 10:07:51 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sockets vs. POST
>
> While working on some routines to send POST data to CGIs, I'm having some
> trouble getti
With HTTPtracer I discovered that
> the POST from Netscape/Microsoft actually goes in two
> parts. First it POSTS the headers, then it POSTS the
> data, in a following message. I concluded that
> Metacard just POSTS once, so the data doesn't get
> through.
Thank's Michael
ta to
> CGIs, I'm having some
> trouble getting the data in the right format and
> it's raise two questions:
>
> 1. Would it be any easier to take control over the
> whole transaction by
> using sockets instead of relying on MC's POST? My
> first hunch is tha
While working on some routines to send POST data to CGIs, I'm having some
trouble getting the data in the right format and it's raise two questions:
1. Would it be any easier to take control over the whole transaction by
using sockets instead of relying on MC's POST? My first h
I asked:
>is there any way of finding out the IP address of the
>current computer a stack is running on without making
>a socket connection to another machine?
Thanks for the replies from LiangTyan Fui and Michael Kann.
Cheers
Peter
--
P
Peter Reid asked --
is there any way of finding out the IP address of the
current computer a stack is running on without making
a socket connection to another machine?
-- on Windows98 I've had success with the following:
on mouseUp
put empty into fld "ipconfigfld"
set hideConsoleWindows to
On 1/2/01 1:44 AM, Peter Reid wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm just starting to experiment with very simple sockets for message
> between two computers on the same TCP/IP LAN. I'm taking the scripts
> posted by Kevin on 6 Nov and Mark on 1 Jan as my starting point.
>
> I&#x
Hi
I'm just starting to experiment with very simple sockets for message
between two computers on the same TCP/IP LAN. I'm taking the scripts
posted by Kevin on 6 Nov and Mark on 1 Jan as my starting point.
I'm hoping to use the same stack on both computers, each acting as
bo
Mark Luetzelschwab a écrit :
>
> Since I have been mucking around with sockets (as others on this list
> have), I decided to make a simple stack that acted as both a client
> and a server and could send any data between the two.
>
> My current plan is to make it a stack
Since I have been mucking around with sockets (as others on this list
have), I decided to make a simple stack that acted as both a client
and a server and could send any data between the two.
My current plan is to make it a stack that can act as a library so I
can use it at either end and
s all use their own protocols, you would have to have inside
information or some documentation to have any chance of figuring out how to
talk to them. However, if you just want to try out sockets, a most basic
example (posted previously) would be:
> The following scripts work well for me in local o
Spade.org)
in quake, you have to send it datagrams (thanks to Qstats and source code at
http://www.activesw.com/people/steve and Luc the fragmaster at
http//3d.win.be/
if you dont do that, you wont get anything...
i still havent got anything from any quake servers yet but soon i hope!
The FTP clie
On 4/11/00 4:02 pm, Monte Goulding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be a bit off your topic but it's still about sockets. I have never
> played with this so am just asking through curiosity. My field of study and
> work is in Exercise and Sports Science. In this fie
half Of Monte Goulding
> Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 5:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: sockets: a revelation
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> This may be a bit off your topic but it's still about sockets. I
> have never
> played with this so am just asking through
Hi
This may be a bit off your topic but it's still about sockets. I have never
played with this so am just asking through curiosity. My field of study and
work is in Exercise and Sports Science. In this field (and may others I
might add) there are a lot of gadgets as you would under
>
>At 10:27 AM -0500 11/3/00, andu wrote:
>
>>Well, if you consider a server some app that's just listening.
>
>Hi Andu
>
>I was thinking of the ease of installation, not the complexities of
>the server app itself. Your http stack is a great example of this.
>I'm still surprised that clicking t
At 10:27 AM -0500 11/3/00, andu wrote:
>Well, if you consider a server some app that's just listening.
Hi Andu
I was thinking of the ease of installation, not the complexities of
the server app itself. Your http stack is a great example of this.
I'm still surprised that clicking the "Start Se
>
>Hi all,
>
>Sorry for this rambling mail, but I just had one of those "see the
>light" experiences that leaves you feeling both like a genius and an
>idiot at the same time.
>
>Like others I guess, I've been trying to get to grips with the new
>so
Hi all,
Sorry for this rambling mail, but I just had one of those "see the
light" experiences that leaves you feeling both like a genius and an
idiot at the same time.
Like others I guess, I've been trying to get to grips with the new
sockets features of Metacard, and seeing h
65 matches
Mail list logo
