Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Josh Luthman
Message- > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com on behalf of Robert Andrews > Sent: Mon 5/4/2009 7:41 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question > > Depending upon pseudobridge for this will bite you in the future... > Do

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
t, just trying to get my ducks in a row before my goose is cooked ;) thanks, ds -Original Message- From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com on behalf of Robert Andrews Sent: Mon 5/4/2009 7:41 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Depend

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Robert Andrews
Depending upon pseudobridge for this will bite you in the future... Don't do it, it will get guaranteed. Is there some reason you cannot route to the AP? Give the AP it's own subnet? Robert Butch Evans wrote: On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:33 -0500, David Smith wrote: Sry, arp. Im in the

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Butch Evans
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:33 -0500, David Smith wrote: > Sry, arp. Im in the car ;) Static ARP will not fix this. The problem is related to 802.11 (as you have pointed out in your question). IF you run a netwatch script to ping the remote devices from time to time, it may help. -- *

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Butch Evans
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 17:50 -0500, David Smith wrote: > I cant implement WDS. In this case, the best solution is to route or NAT (if you have that option). Layer2 will be broken for you due to the network configuration. -- *

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
Sry, arp. Im in the car ;) -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:30 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Static nat or static ARP? Static ARP is /ip arp On 5/4/09, David Smith wrote: > Got it. I

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Josh Luthman
PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question > > Yep - /tool netwatch > > Pretty self explanatory, but simply put: > > You give it an IP (not host name =(, error timeout and duration and it pings > that IP every duration and i

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
Got it. I was looking at setting up a pinger of some sort to keep it refreshed. How can i add static nat? -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:15 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Yep - /tool

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Josh Luthman
mith < david.sm...@preferredtechnology.com> wrote: > Netwatch? > > -Original Message- > From: Josh Luthman > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:06 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question > > Looks like you are right: > *stati

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
Netwatch? -Original Message- From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:06 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Looks like you are right: *station-pseudobridge* - wireless station that can be put in bridge. MAC NAT is performed

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Josh Luthman
Cell: 972-898-2626 > Fax: 972-644-4911 > > > > -Original Message- > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto: > mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:47 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re:

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:47 PM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Bridging is more like a switch. Not sure what you mean by NAT for MACs... The bridge will learn MACs and, like a switch versus a hub, it will only send the traffic to the po

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Josh Luthman
; Cell: 972-898-2626 > Fax: 972-644-4911 > > > -Original Message- > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com [mailto: > mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:35 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Shouldn't have a problem...if you're really concerned you can put the MACs in staticly but if you have a delay in ARP resolution then you have a poor link. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-55

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question Shouldn't have a problem...if you're really concerned you can put the MACs in staticly but if you have a delay in ARP resolution then you have a poor link. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-55

Re: [Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread Josh Luthman
Shouldn't have a problem...if you're really concerned you can put the MACs in staticly but if you have a delay in ARP resolution then you have a poor link. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 "When you have eliminated the impossible, that

[Mikrotik] pseudobridge polled devices question

2009-05-04 Thread David Smith
I have a rb433 with (2) 52 radios. One radio (WLAN1) is 802.11a and connects to an ap which is connected to the default gateway. The other radio (WLAN2) is 802.11bg and allows client access with 1 SSID. WLAN 1 is Station pseudobridge, and WLAN2 is ap-bridge. On the WLAN2 side, the clients consi