On May 17, 2012, at 6:02 PM, kd6...@yahoo.com wrote:
In that case, why have standards at all if the results from non-compliant
software will be accepted anyway? Rejection of non-standard data (including
messages) should give sufficient motivation to fix broken software.
Except in the
On 19/04/2006, at 12:23 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? We see it quite a lot, and always from
cable modem
or DSL machines (probably cracked Windoze boxes.)
i haven't had time to do the forensics yet but i'm definitely of the
opinion that greylist aint working so well
On 02/12/2005, at 4:20 PM, Alan Premselaar wrote:
You can do all of that with Graphdefang, which should be in the
contrib directory of MIMEDefang. I haven't checked to see if it's
still
included, but it used to be.
..finally prodded to do something about it on my debian systems, i
[Apologies for being flustered and hitting send before i'd added some
proper diagnostification :-) let's start again]
Hi List..
mimedefang 2.51-2 on debian with sendmail 8.13.1-16, clamav 0.85.1-2
and spamassassin 3.0.2-1 on a 2.4GHz Celeron with 2G RAM is working
like a charm, until
Hi List..
All of a sudden in the last few days i'm getting complaints of 0-byte
attachments* appearing from various senders. I'm wondering if i'm
right to put this down to virus activity though - but i can't see
anything in my logs that would indicate mimedefang has suddenly
decided to
straying a little OT but..
On 19/11/2005, at 4:43 AM, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
Luckily, this time, you would be able to tell I can't do
anything about it, it is erorr in client's software that generated
those
emails, and it can only be fixed in that software.
..i've been saying that
On 12/08/2005, at 10:27 AM, Stewart wrote:
I applied the patch the other day using the debian package of ytnef
(cuz i'm lame and prefer to use apt-get wherever possible :)
Tested it a bit and it seemed fine but all sorts of things went
awry the next day - attachments went missing
On 15/08/2005, at 12:53 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Stewart wrote:
Is it that the attachments are being processed in the same
directory and under load some messages are being processed at the
same
time as each other out of the same directory?
No, that's not possible at all.
That's
Hi list..
I've just resubscribed to the list for just this thread so forgive me
for jumping in with my own issue here..
I applied the patch the other day using the debian package of ytnef
(cuz i'm lame and prefer to use apt-get wherever possible :)
Tested it a bit and it seemed fine but
Simply remove the line in the sendmail.mc file that enables the MD
Milter then issue the appropriate commands on your system to regenerate
the sendmail.cf
under debian it is sendmailconfig - under solaris you do it by hand with
a m4 command, dont know about other platforms. Review the docs that
quick.
Thanks David,
Stewart
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
more than needed).
Does anyone have any thoughts on it? (In the mean time I will try
altering my -filter)
Stewart
This is in sub filter_begin():
my($code, $category, $action) = message_contains_virus();
This is near the top of sub filter():
if ($FoundVirus) {
my($code
,
Stewart
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
.
So doing it by hand the clamav finds these viruses, but through
mimedefang they are being missed.
I am at a loss where to go from here. clamav can detect them, but clamav
+mimedefang is missing them.
Any thoughts or tips?
Stewart
___
Visit http
to hold out for
the debian package to hit testing (where I nabbing my clamav packages
from).
Thanks Bill.
If things are still the same after .73, I'll wave a chicken in the air
then re-email the issue. :)
Stewart
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 11:07 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
Stewart James wrote:
OK here
looking at why not of it all.
I will let the list know the outcome :)
Cheers,
Stewart
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
wrong?
Thanks,
Stewart
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
, they really need to go to
/dev/nullmaybe I should redirect all detected viruses to managements
mailboxes and they can sort out what to do with them ;)
Cheers,
Stewart
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
From a different perspective it would seem perhaps approriate to have a
Variable $VirusScannerName set by the various routines that invoke virus
scanners e.g. This would mean the Name of the scanner would be available
to mimedefang-filter as VirusScannerMessage is.
It does not look too have
COntinued from previos message (why is send and attach so close in
evolution?)
Finally this was done on mimedefang.pl that comes with Debian Unstable:
2.42-1
Attached is the patch.
Regards,
Stewart James
--- /usr/bin/mimedefang.pl 2004-05-04 19:46:41.0 +1000
+++ mimedefang.pl 2004
definition of the virus). But I really dislike
running local hacks in upstream code (only from a management
perspective), what would the possibility of this getting put into
mimedefang proper? Or is there an even better way to handle this?
Thanks again,
Stewart
to send mail
via their own mail server by blocking outgoing connections to port 25.
VPN is overkill in my view. I'd rather use SSL based services for secure
remote access.
--
John Stewart -- Computing and Communications Services, Carleton University
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED
22 matches
Mail list logo
