[Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Kenneth Porter
What are people on this list doing about the recently-announced vulnerability in Acrobat Reader? Some recent coverage: http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-nice-weekend-pdf-love.html http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/24/0032201

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Recommending that people disable JavaScript in Adobe I believe is the only current course of action other than blocking PDFs which will likely cause people wth pitchforks and torches to storm the IT Castle. Other than that, unfortunately I'm hoping March 11th when Adobe is supposed to patch

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread WBrown
Kevin wrote on 02/24/2009 02:16:38 PM: Recommending that people disable JavaScript in Adobe I believe is the only current course of action other than blocking PDFs which will likely cause people wth pitchforks and torches to storm the IT Castle. Blocking PDF's is not going to be popular.

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Blocking PDF's is not going to be popular. Can/will the AV definitions be able to detect malicious files? I don't know. I don't think many people have much information about the exploit. Other than that, unfortunately I'm hoping March 11th when Adobe is supposed to patch comes quickly

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Ben Kamen
Kenneth Porter wrote: What are people on this list doing about the recently-announced vulnerability in Acrobat Reader? Some recent coverage: http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-nice-weekend-pdf-love.html http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/24/0032201 Turning off

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread David F. Skoll
wbr...@e1b.org wrote: Blocking PDF's is not going to be popular. Can/will the AV definitions be able to detect malicious files? According to http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-nice-weekend-pdf-love.html, ClamAV has signatures. The clam sigs are called Exploit.PDF-26,

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread WBrown
Looks like ClamAvV has added definitions for some PDF vulnerabilities today: http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20090224.162205.44ab94c8.en.html -- May you solve interesting problems William Brown Web Development Messaging Services Technology Services, WNYRIC, Erie 1 BOCES (716)821-7285

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Ben Kamen
David F. Skoll wrote: I think I'll stick to xpdf for now. Yay xpdf!! -ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. = Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net As seen somewhere on the net:

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 20:09, wbr...@e1b.org wrote: Looks like ClamAvV has added definitions for some PDF vulnerabilities today: Snort have released signatures, though I don't know whether they are for the exploits or the vulnerability. -- Please keep list traffic on the

Re: [Mimedefang] PDF vulnerability

2009-02-24 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:42 PM -0500 Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote: I don't know. I don't think many people have much information about the exploit. The blog link I posted earlier indicates that it's the jbig2 decompression code that fails with a crafted jbig2 object,