On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:13:54 -0800, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I found something interesting, namely a (more than once)
reported bug that looks very similar to The alpha bug. The primary
difference is you get cpu_switch_queuescan rather than cpu_switch in
the trace output.
2003-10-01
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:26:38PM -0700, Ludwig Mises wrote:
It seems that only root can access /dev/rcd0c when using tools such as
cdrdao, cdda2wav and cdparanoia, even when the user is in the operator
group:
$ cdparanoia -v -d /dev/rcd0c -B
Checking /dev/rcd0c for cdrom...
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:11:57AM +, pedro la peu wrote:
I work for an ISP
It shows. Disagree off-list please.
If you insult someone on list, expect the same back, on list, you coward.
hi Siju,
Siju George wrote:
so the DSL Router is working and the username and password is correct.
What could be the problem?
If it is a DSL _router_ you just have to setup a normal network, PPPoE
is handled by the router.
If it is a DSL _modem_ you have to setup PPPoE.
mfG
-- stefan --
Hi,
I would like to load/unload an emule anchor when needed.
Unfortunately it does not work as expected as ort tcp 4662 traffic coming back
to my router is still blocked.
Dec 22 13:05:36.720276 rule 2/(match) block in on pppoe0: 80.239.200.108.34965
158.64.125.147.4662: [|tcp] (DF)
Dec 22
El Jueves, 22 de Diciembre de 2005 13:37, escribis:
Hi,
I would like to load/unload an emule anchor when needed.
Unfortunately it does not work as expected as ort tcp 4662 traffic coming
back to my router is still blocked.
Dec 22 13:05:36.720276 rule 2/(match) block in on pppoe0:
hi
i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
some tip?
thanks
David
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:35:12AM -0300, David fire wrote:
hi
i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
some tip?
man sshd_config
Look for PermitRootLogin
Bernd
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc]
David fire wrote:
hi
i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
some tip?
http://www.google.com/search?q=disable+root+login+ssh
Behold the power of the internets.
Ryan
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of
Thx a lot for replying.
Hmm, I'm a bit lost now ...
Why do I have to move the anchor before the block statement?
Actually (without moving) the anchor authpf works well and no traffic is
blocked.
Having a look here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/authpf.html the anchor is at the bottom too, of
Reza Muhammad wrote:
C Compiler cannot create executable ?
what does it mean ?
It can mean a lot of things, and since this looks like a message from a
configure script, it might be the same issue that happened to me once.
Check your environment variables -- for example, a
Nick Ryan wrote:
We have a problem getting mail from gmail through spamd. Google's gmail
public mail service use a large number of smtp servers. The first time
In addition to that, they also appear to be retrying either too fast or
too slow ... *sigh*
rdr pass on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like to macro pretty much every variable that is used in more than one
place (i.e., hostnames, ports, etc; hostnames are especially likely to
be re-re-re-...-used).
That is very good advice. I tend to advocate that myself.
If you choose good
hi
this days i was doing that debuging the firewall
i do this
i put log in each rule i ant to debug
then i pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
then
pfctl -s rules /home/david/rules.txt
then
tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0 filter option
you can look in the PF pdf for all the filter options
now try each rule
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
I hope this isn't too OT for this list, but...
Hi,
At home, I have your working target :)
I use an OBSD/i386 3.8 box connected to an ADSL router, but configured
in bridge mode (modem-only). If you use a router, you don't have to
configure PPPoE on your OBSD. If you use a bridge (seems to be your
case), you need to configure PPPoE on your
On 12/22/05, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few
Downey Savings - Welcome To A Friendlier Easier Way Of Banking
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
You have added [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a new email address for your
Downey Online Banking.
If you did not authorize this change or if you need assistance with your
account, please contact Downey Savings customer
Quoting from: http://www.onlamp.com/lpt/a/6384
The biggest drawback of svnd is its lack of security in the general use case.
It is vulnerable to an offline dictionary attack. That is, you can generate a
database mapping known ciphertext blocks on the disk back into pass phrases
that can be
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Graham Toal wrote:
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
I hope
Hello.
I've been running other firewalls on this IP address with the same
settings in the past, but am having problems setting up the Gateway
with OpenBSD 3.8. It comes back with no route to host and when I do
a nestat -rn, the Gateway is missing even though /etc/mygate exists.
IP -
On 12/22/05, martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I've been running other firewalls on this IP address with the same
settings in the past, but am having problems setting up the Gateway
with OpenBSD 3.8. It comes back with no route to host and when I do
a nestat -rn, the Gateway is
On Thursday 22 December 2005 13:12, you wrote:
It comes back with no route to host and when I do
a nestat -rn, the Gateway is missing even though /etc/mygate exists.
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
How do you get to the gateway? It isn't on the subnet. Your
--- Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you assigned to
your
external IP. I have a feeling it's a
martin wrote:
--- Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you assigned to
your
external IP. I have a feeling
On 12/22/05, martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:46, Chris Smith wrote:
GW - 209.216.77.6
Oops...I read that as 209.216.76.6 and not 209.216.77.6, so your netmask
would have to be different than what I suggested.
Do you have another network device?
The gateway address is usually the address that your system
On 12/22/05, martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you
On 12/22/05, martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you
Here's something strange. I'm trying to connect from a pf gateway to an ftp
server and it's failing in a very specific manner. Going through the pf
gateway works fine using passive mode, but from the gateway itself using
ftp(1) doesn't seem to work.
Observe:
$ ftp ftp.example.org
[ login as
Are you using PPPoE for connecting to your ISP?
I don't want to waste your time with suggestions about PPPoE-related
troubleshooting if that is not appropriate. I mention this because the only
comparable routing entries that I have seen (to what you describe in your
email) is with tun devices.
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 4:20:28 PM, you wrote:
RCW Would adding the line:
RCW supercede domain-name-servers dns.IP.address.1 dns.IP.address.2;
RCW ...do the job of hardcoding:
RCW nameserver dns.IP.address.1
RCW nameserver dns.IP.address.2
RCW ...into the 'resolv.conf'
Hello,
I used to change the behavior of my keyboard with
/etc/wsconsctl.conf:
keyboard.repeat.del1=200# change keyboard repeat/delay
keyboard.repeat.deln=40
Now I plugged it to usb (see dmesg) - but from then on I am not able
to change the behavior anymore with wsconsctl. I am not sure
How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
thanks
-JD
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:10:56PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
see FAQ 15.2.3.
--
steven
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
On 12/22/05, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:10:56PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
look in cvs. the answer is 1.85 plus some of 1.86 plus some other patches.
see FAQ 15.2.3.
not so useful
At 05:32 PM 12/22/2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/22/05, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:10:56PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
look in cvs. the answer is 1.85 plus some of 1.86 plus some
On 12/22/05, J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
thanks
Check out http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/db/ to
see the one included with OpenBSD, and /usr/ports/databases/db/ for
other versions.
Jason
Hi
You have received a greeting card from hea345tr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You can preview your eCard message below:
-
Believe it or not!
Hey, guys! Check this out. Perfect place for our next ultimate adventure!
Gorgeous
Hi,
This problem has been bugging me for month now. It started
happening a month after 3.8 got tagged. At least, that's when I
started noticing it. So it might be anything. But I suspect the
OpenBSD side the most since returning to an older Linux release on
the client from a liveCD didn't fix the
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:27:12 +0530, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Details of the exact kind of service package you have from your provider
and occasionally info on the DSL hardware you're using are needed to
figure out how things should be set up on your end.
Its a ADSL Router from
On 22/12/05, eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's something strange. I'm trying to connect from a pf gateway to an ftp
server and it's failing in a very specific manner. Going through the pf
gateway works fine using passive mode, but from the gateway itself using
ftp(1) doesn't seem to work.
I just tried installing openbsd on an old hd in the client PC and
exactly the same stuff happens.
And the suggestions made in this message also don't help a bit.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-10/1663.html
# Han
On 12/22/05, Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This problem has been bugging me for month now. It started
happening a month after 3.8 got tagged. At least, that's when I
started noticing it. So it might be anything. But I suspect the
OpenBSD side the most since returning to an older Linux
You have been successfully removed and will not receive any more messages.
46 matches
Mail list logo
