On 4/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me, I just lurk here but:
> 1) if having / ro would actually improve security,
> they would have done so long ago.
> 2) There are probably essential reasons why / cannot be read-only
> on a useable system. Involving /etc, ma
On 2006.04.14, at 11:05 PM, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Well, I wonder how people who pre-orded their CDs, got them,
installed 3.9-RELEASE and run Sendmail are going to patch their
systems?
Use the source code from the CD's themselves and then download the
patch from
http://www.openbsd.org/er
Joco Salvatti wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> To increase the security level of my OpenBSD system I have defined at
> /etc/fstab that the root partition should be read only. /etc/fstab
> follows:
Me, I just lurk here but:
1) if having / ro would actually improve security,
they would have done so lo
Hi all,
To increase the security level of my OpenBSD system I have defined at
/etc/fstab that the root partition should be read only. /etc/fstab
follows:
/dev/wd0a / ffs ro,softdep 1 1
/dev/wd0g /home ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid,noexec 1 2
/dev/wd0f /tmp ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid,noexec 1 2
/d
Maybe I'm the only one around who still uses it, but there's one
option in mailx from SysV that I miss with OpenBSD: ~a. It would
be simpler to have either ~a to add the "-- " with newline, and
read in my .signature, or a .mailrc option that automates the
additions, (preferably both). As it is n
[IMAGE]
personal & business account
Security Alert
Please note that Your Halifax Online Account is about to expire. In order
for it to remain active, please use the link below to proceed and restore
access to Your Account.
# pfctl -F all && pfctl -d
# nmap -vv -sP '0.0.0.*'
Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-04-15 01:58 UCT
sendto in send_ip_packet: sendto(3, packet, 40, 0, 62.201.118.82, 16) =>
No buffer space available
Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying
openbsd 3.7 over a pppoe conecti
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:41:56AM -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
>
> I have the following gmail servers whitelisted in my /etc/whitelist
>
> #gmail
> 64.233.162.192/28 # zproxy gmail
> 64.233.170.192/28 # rproxy gmail
> 64.233.182.192/28 # nproxy gmail
> 64.233.184.192/28 # wproxy gmail
> 66.24
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> everybody who replied CC'ed me, so i got 3 duplicate replies
> since i'm subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] why the CC fellas?
Add a recipe to your mailfilter; something like this:
# You don't want to miss you are CC-ed after all. You just don't want
# them in your maildir
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:22:00AM +0200, Alex Holst wrote:
> I'm trying to find supported GPRS/UMTS modems in stores around here,
> which is harder than you might think. According to i386.html, these two
> are supported:
> # Sony Ericsson GC75 GSM/GPRS modems
> # Sony Ericsson GC89 GSM/EGDE modem
I'm trying to find supported GPRS/UMTS modems in stores around here,
which is harder than you might think. According to i386.html, these two
are supported:
# Sony Ericsson GC75 GSM/GPRS modems
# Sony Ericsson GC89 GSM/EGDE modems
Thus far I've found a Sony Ericsson GC85 - anyone happen know if i
Hi,
I'm prolly going to "USENIX Security Symposium" in Vancouver and
"Defcon" in Las Vegas.
I'm wondering if there are any other symposia or conferences in the US
or Canada that are worth visiting or that might have a high interest
towards security and OpenBSD during that period (end July / start
>>> ksh: cannot fork - try again
>>
>>[rest deleted for brevity]
>>
>>Are you maybe running out of memory? Is your swap partition big enough?
>>
>>CU, Sico.
>>
>>--
>>
>
> i have 730MB of 1GB available and that likely answers your question about
> swap.
I suppose.
> i am also not running KDE, i u
Original message
>Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:05:55 +0200 (CEST)
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ksh: cannot fork - try again ??
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>
>> since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine,
>> i've
>> had a problem wi
> since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine,
> i've
> had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following
> message when
> trying to issue shell commands:
>
> ksh: cannot fork - try again
[rest deleted for brevity]
Are you maybe running out of memory
On 4/14/06, Will H. Backman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> unofficial patch? I never did see anything that said OpenBSD was
> affected by the problem, and I'm always hoping that some of the OS level
> protections might help in situations like this.
not likely.
2006/4/14, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine, i've
> had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following message
> when
> trying to issue shell commands:
>
> ksh: cannot fork - try again
>
> looking at
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine, i've
> had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following message
> when
> trying to issue shell commands:
>
> ksh: cannot fork - try again
>
> looking at m
Thanks folks.
On 4/14/06, Tim Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 April 2006 10:56, Joco Salvatti wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
> >
> > # /dev/rwd0c:
> >
> > My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
> >
> > Thanks..
> >
>
> From `man d
since i've started doing C programming on my openbsd-3.8 release machine, i've
had a problem with running processes. sometimes i get the following message when
trying to issue shell commands:
ksh: cannot fork - try again
looking at my ulimit output, i see the following:
$ ulimit -a
time(cpu-seco
I met Nikolay at the BSD booth at Linuxworld Boston and he is interested in
putting together a BSD booth at OpenFest in Sofia, Bulgaria later this year. Do
we have any contacts in that part of the world who can make sure that there is
some OpenBSD swag at the booth? Please cc Nikolay in any resp
On Friday 14 April 2006 10:56, Joco Salvatti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
>
> # /dev/rwd0c:
>
> My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
>
> Thanks..
>
>From `man disklabel`:
diskSpecify the disk to operate on. It can be specified either by
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Joco Salvatti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
>
> # /dev/rwd0c:
>
> My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
Because disklabel opens the raw device, block devices are normally
only used to access filesystems.
-Otto
Hi all,
When I run 'disklabel wd0', it returns:
# /dev/rwd0c:
My question is: why /dev/rwd0c instead of /dev/wd0c?
Thanks..
--
Joco Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://www.openbsd-pa.org
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So you say that the patch should go into OPENBSD_3_9 branch after 3.9
is *officially* released? Well, I wonder how people who pre-orded
their CDs, got them, installed 3.9-RELEASE and run Sendmail are going
to patch their systems?
I got 3.8 almost 2 weeks early, and seem to remember app
sigh
-Original Message-
From: Ms.KIMAEVE LIOUDMILA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 14 april 2006 12:30
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Thank you my dear GOD bless you.
My Dear.
I have a profiling amount in an excess of US$123M, which I seek your
partnership in accommodating fo
On 4/14/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No. All patches past the _BASE tag always go into -STABLE. In this
> > case, correctly into OPENBSD_3_9. This is not special AFAIK.
>
> *sigh*
> HELLO... Topic is WHEN they go in.
> 3.9 is not official yet. This patch set went into -stable
Michael Flanagan wrote:
I found myself needing up apply the recent patch for sendmail against
an aging 3.6 stable box.
I took the sendmail patch for the 3.7 stable branch and applied it
against 3.6 stable. It applied cleanly with the exception of a half
dozen hunks in a couple of files. I mer
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:16:17PM +0200, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> On 4/14/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c
> >
> > OPENBSD_3_9_BASE is tagged...and that's it. (well..usually. I'm sure
> > there's som
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:49:20PM +0200, Lukasz Sztachanski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:24:33PM +0200, Dick Visser wrote:
> > Hi guys
> >
> > Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
> >
> > You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mas
On Friday 14 April 2006 07:45, OS rider wrote:
> Hi all , my name is takesima , a japanese .
> i can manipulate a windows 2000 machine ( which address is 192.168.1.222
> ) via internet .
>
> the point is " rdr on tun0 inet proto tcp from any to 10.4.0.2 ->
> 192.168.1.22 in pf.conf " and " vncviewe
Hi,
I'm trying to connect to a Wifi ISP over PPPoE, with the hardware:
Soekris net4511
Senao NL-2511CD PLUS EXT2 PCMCIA (wi driver)
13dBi Patch antenna
using OBSD 3.8 GENERIC kernel via flashdist.
Using the same PCMCIA and the same antenna, at the same location,
on a Windows98 laptop with RASP
I found myself needing up apply the recent patch for sendmail against
an aging 3.6 stable box.
I took the sendmail patch for the 3.7 stable branch and applied it
against 3.6 stable. It applied cleanly with the exception of a half
dozen hunks in a couple of files. I merged those by hand and
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 12:24:33PM +0200, Dick Visser wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
>
> You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
> Having networks in AllowUsers would be extremely usefull.
>
> Best regards
Hi guys
Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
Having networks in AllowUsers would be extremely usefull.
Best regards,
--
Dick Visser
TERENA (IT Support Officer)
Singel 468D 1017AW Amsterdam
On 4/14/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.sbin/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c
>
> OPENBSD_3_9_BASE is tagged...and that's it. (well..usually. I'm sure
> there's some exception somewhere...)
>
> The patches were put into OPENBSD_3_9 (a.k.a.,
Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
...
It was fixed. First time I've seen it happen before official release
though.
Well, security problems just before releases are not that common. ;-)
If I understand this right. This commit is in OPENBSD_3_9_BASE in cvs but it's
not on CD's. Isn't it ?
n...
A
Hi all,
I'm having a weird problem with my connection, I switched from cable to
dsl (covad), and they gave me a netopia router to be setup in bridge mode
so that my OpenBSD 3.9 current can acquire the IP address. My 3.9 has 2
NIC, (fxp0 and xl0). My xl0 is my public IP, my fxp0 is 192.168.3.2, one
Hi
2006-04-14, 10:37:47, you wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:19:28PM -0400, John L. Scarfone wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Joachim Schipper stated:
>> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
>> > > So, where do these commits go now ? To OPENB
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:19:28PM -0400, John L. Scarfone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:05:37AM +0200, Joachim Schipper stated:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
> > > So, where do these commits go now ? To OPENBSD_3_9_BASE ?
> > > People say they received
Jeg har en ny e-mail-adresse!Nu kan du e-maile mig pe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toto Lotto NL
Spadestraat 1,
Oosterhout,
The Netherlands.
Dear Lucky Winner,
We are pleased to announce you as one of the 3 lucky winners in the Toto Mega
Jackpot Lottery
draw held recently. All 3 winning address
41 matches
Mail list logo
