On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 09:02:47PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> (1) i have 2 blocks of 8 static IPs at my disposal, one at home and one at
> work,
So two /29's ?
> and both connections are 3Mb/512Kb ADSL via PPPoE. the upstream traffic at
> work
> is beginning to saturate the connection an
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Peter Philipp wrote:
> I just tested running hexdump -x on two different systems. One system is a
> macppc and the other and amd64. On the same file the order (endian) of the
> hexpairs are swapped. Is this supposed to be like that?
>
> If there was an effort to make he
On 7/7/06, Epropiedades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This e-mail message is an advertisement and/or solicitation.Este mensaje de
correo electronico es una publicidad y/o solicitada.
Si las imágenes no son visibles en este correo, por favor visite la
versión en linea.
If images are not visible
Jonathan Gray schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 04:14:12PM +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
>> Guido Tschakert schrieb:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> don't know if this is the right place, but I post it anyway.
>>>
>>> I bought an D-Link DUB-E100 which should work on OpenBSD accordingly to
>>> the web site.
>>>
Si vous disirez visualiser ce mail au format html, recopiez l'adresse suivante
dans votre navigateur:
http://www.mdworks.info/view.html?id=1895&ref=112536\n\n\n\nSi vous disirez
vous disinscrire, il suffit de cliquer sur le lien privu ou de recopier
l'adresse suivante dans votre navigateur:
ht
Hi Nick,
On 2006.07.07, at 2:51 PM, Nick Guenther wrote:
I've used R-Studio and it works quite well (and quickly so long as you
keep your computer out of screensavers and things). It's somewhat
expensive at 100$. It works by just scanning the disk for signatures
of files, and is usually able to
On 7/6/06, Shane J Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Vladas,
On 2006.07.06, at 9:56 PM, vladas wrote:
> I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
> (not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
> shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
> of backup of the mess wi
Si vous disirez visualiser ce mail au format html, recopiez l'adresse suivante
dans votre navigateur:
http://www.mdworks.info/view.html?id=1876&ref=112533\n\n\n\nSi vous disirez
vous disinscrire, il suffit de cliquer sur le lien privu ou de recopier
l'adresse suivante dans votre navigateur:
ht
Hello Vladas,
On 2006.07.06, at 9:56 PM, vladas wrote:
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd and put Puffy into
that disk (dedicated install). The pr
On Thursday 06 July 2006 06:23, Andreas Lundin wrote:
> I'm about to deploy OpenOSPFD in a live environment and my question
> goes out to those who have used(or are using) OpenOSPFD that shipped
> with 3.9. It has been running it a lab enviroment for quite some time
> with only minor issues.
I've
i've started doing some background reading on how BGP works and am adrift in a
sea of acronyms. i'm confident that i'll learn how to swim, but there are a few
questions that i'd like answers to before i make the time investment to learn
more. boolean answers are acceptable, more information wouldn'
On Thursday, 6 July 2006 at 17:27:09 +0100, Richard Wilson wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend a load balancer for http/https for OpenBSD?
> Currently I'm using Pound, from http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ which runs
> under OpenBSD
I use pound too.
Version 1.8 and 1.9 work for me.
I can't get version 2
On Thursday, 6 July 2006 at 17:39:26 +0200, mickey wrote:
> > Do you refer to systems with low memory (or at least the need to
> > have the kernel not to occupy more memory than a minimum), for
> > example? If not, some example would be really appreciated to get
> > a deeper understanding of the t
Thank you all for your really informative replies.
On 7. jul. 2006, at 00.11, Clint Pachl wrote:
Richard Wilson wrote:
Hulloo list,
Can anyone recommend a load balancer for http/https for OpenBSD?
Currently I'm using Pound, from http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ which
runs under OpenBSD, and supports connection tracking via IP,
cookie and request
> Is there any way to combine htaccess with one-time-pads?
>
> The problem is the followring: Somebody wanna have acces to serval
> statistics (provided via https). Unfortunately I`ve thos eproblems:
>
> A VPN is no solution because this guy should have acces even from
> public Computers (so stor
Richard Wilson wrote:
Hulloo list,
Can anyone recommend a load balancer for http/https for OpenBSD?
Currently I'm using Pound, from http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ which runs
under OpenBSD, and supports connection tracking via IP, cookie and
request ID (eg PHPSESSID) and seems to do everything I ne
Perhaps this is an old issue?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/1997/06/msg0.html
Then again, perhaps not.
On 7/6/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just tested running hexdump -x on two different systems. One system is a
macppc and the other and amd64. On the same file th
> "victorc" == victorc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
victorc> I heard your interview on Perlcast a few months ago.
victorc> I found it helpful and interesting.
victorc> Josh McAdams does a great job of podcasting and interviewing.
victorc> I know this reply is off topic, but I thought the lis
I just tested running hexdump -x on two different systems. One system is a
macppc and the other and amd64. On the same file the order (endian) of the
hexpairs are swapped. Is this supposed to be like that?
If there was an effort to make hexdump -x endian safe, which order should it
prefer (
Hello list!
It's me again (http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/
2006-06/1876.html).
My system doesn't make it past the bootloader where it says "disk:
fd0". S- and P-ATA disks don't get listed and the system hangs.
My system consists of two Sil3152 with four S-ATA disks, a P-ATA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/05/2006 06:18:41 PM:
> After the heat I took trying to upgrade from 3.7 to 3.8 via source
recompile,
> I took the advice to heart to simply untar some binaries right over the
top of
> my running system, which seemed a lot more scary to me.
>
> However, I'm happy to
Aloha
Am 06.07.2006 um 14:09 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe AMD Geode CPUs are an alternative but I didn`t found any
reseller
wich sells them nor any Board where they`re assembled on (fixed).
http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm
Hulloo list,
Can anyone recommend a load balancer for http/https for OpenBSD?
Currently I'm using Pound, from http://www.apsis.ch/pound/ which runs
under OpenBSD, and supports connection tracking via IP, cookie and
request ID (eg PHPSESSID) and seems to do everything I need.
It is currently n
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:46:43 -0500
Mike Piety <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:15:24 -0400
> "Peter Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Something like:
> >
> > pass in quick on $ext_if from { $friendly_networks } to any port ssh
> > keep state block in on $ext_if from any to
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 04:14:12PM +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> Guido Tschakert schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > don't know if this is the right place, but I post it anyway.
> >
> > I bought an D-Link DUB-E100 which should work on OpenBSD accordingly to
> > the web site.
> >
> > But it doesn't. Ou
> > Do you refer to systems with low memory (or at least the need to
> > have the kernel not to occupy more memory than a minimum), for
> > example? If not, some example would be really appreciated to get
> > a deeper understanding of the technology.
>
> you can start by reading some on the subjec
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:15:24 -0400
"Peter Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something like:
>
> pass in quick on $ext_if from { $friendly_networks } to any port ssh
> keep state block in on $ext_if from any to any port ssh
>
> should work. You can place "$friendly_networks" into a table that
>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:08:56PM +0200, Pablo Mar?n Ram?n wrote:
> > > > > * Improved performance
> > > > there are known scenarios where it does degrades performance.
> > > I meant in the general case.
> > me too
>
> Do you refer to systems with low memory (or at least the need to
> have the ke
> Hmm that's odd. I wonder why that is. I've done "boot dump"'s before in DDB
> and swapencrypt was enabled and it worked then.
It works if you explicitely request it from ddb. It doesn't if it comes from
panic().
Miod
Sorry, I didn't fully comprehend you e-mail (that's what I get for
reading my openbsd mail at work!) the first time around.
Have you attempted to write a script that gets the network address for
a host via `whois` and start expanding the "blacklist"?
For instance, monitor your logs for repeated
On 7/6/06, Bharj, Gagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our server is getting hammered on a daily basis by IPs trying to open
an ssh session.
The archives contain a myriad of options to mitigate the effects of
brute force attacks, etc. This topic has been (repeatedly) beaten to
death on this list, i
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:06:46PM +0200, Miod Vallat wrote:
> Kernel crash dumps are silently disabled if swap encryption is used.
> You need to disable it (e.g. by uncommenting the relevant line in
> /etc/sysctl.conf).
>
> Miod
Hmm that's odd. I wonder why that is. I've done "boot dump"'s bef
Something like:
pass in quick on $ext_if from { $friendly_networks } to any port ssh keep state
block in on $ext_if from any to any port ssh
should work. You can place "$friendly_networks" into a table that
gets loaded from a file if the list is large. And/or update it via
pftcl on the fly.
O
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 04:16:07PM +0200, Pablo Mar?n Ram?n wrote:
> > > * Improved performance
> > there are known scenarios where it does degrades performance.
>
> I meant in the general case.
me too
> > > * Faster recovery latency after a crash
> > this is just not true at all.
>
> Effective
> > > > * Improved performance
> > > there are known scenarios where it does degrades performance.
> > I meant in the general case.
> me too
Do you refer to systems with low memory (or at least the need to
have the kernel not to occupy more memory than a minimum), for
example? If not, some example
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:04:28 +0200 (CEST)
Moritz Kiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> > On 7/4/06, Chet Uber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...
> >> The reason I had said anything is
> >> that when I do forensic work I used to just do MD5's of files, bu
On 6 July 2006, vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I was not clear enough in the first place: due to the first 10Mb being
> gone, I do not expect to find any valid fs anymore. What I still hope
> for are individual files from the 3Gb image file that I have. I mean
> e.g. exe's, or dll's, zip
Hello Folks,
Our server is getting hammered on a daily basis by IPs trying to open an ssh
session. Currently, I'm manually putting the subnets (in a pf table) that are
repeatedly trying to get in. As you can see, this list will eventually get
very big and will be unmaintainable. Is there any wa
>>> vladas 6-Jul-06 13:46 >>>
>
> Thank you for your replies. I was not clear enough in the first place:
> due to the first 10Mb being gone, I do not expect to find any valid fs
> anymore. What I still hope for are individual files from the 3Gb image
> file that I have. I mean e.g. exe's, or dll's,
> > * Improved performance
> there are known scenarios where it does degrades performance.
I meant in the general case.
> > * Faster recovery latency after a crash
> this is just not true at all.
Effectively, background fsck isn't implemented yet under OpenBSD
and NetBSD (FreeBSD has this featur
Guido Tschakert schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> don't know if this is the right place, but I post it anyway.
>
> I bought an D-Link DUB-E100 which should work on OpenBSD accordingly to
> the web site.
>
> But it doesn't. Our lovely vendor D-Link changed the chipset and called
> it H/W Ver.:B1
> here comes
Hi
After reading the replies to my routerboard 44 question I reached the
conclusion that I have no choice but buy the Intel quad NIC (my boss
will hate me ;-)). I've started collecting quotes this morning, but I
was only able to get quotes for the PWLA8494GT card and not for the
PWLA8494MT ca
FTP wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:08:43AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:37:56PM +0200, FTP wrote:
Hi,
the dovecot ports pkg is a bit 'old' but would it make sense to istall this and
then make a second installation from the current source? Does the port packag
sory to create dead horse thread againt because i newbie in pf n openbsd .
ok i try all
thx for all respon
Hello,
don't know if this is the right place, but I post it anyway.
I bought an D-Link DUB-E100 which should work on OpenBSD accordingly to
the web site.
But it doesn't. Our lovely vendor D-Link changed the chipset and called
it H/W Ver.:B1
here comes the part of the dmesg
ugen0 at uhub4 port 4
Pablo Marmn Ramsn wrote:
I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and
I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
enabled by default.
Pros:
* Improved performance
* Faster recovery latency after a crash
* Can handle a security problem that ca
On 7/6/06, Bernd Schoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:33:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any way to combine htaccess with one-time-pads?
Looks like a difficult task, as http is not session based. So, the
brower would ask for a new OTP on every GET reque
vladas wrote:
> due to the first 10Mb being gone, I do not expect to find any valid fs
> anymore. What I still hope for are individual files from the 3Gb image
> file that I have. I mean e.g. exe's, or dll's, zip's, lha's etc should have
> their size written in them or their data structures, not on
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My hardware is a Duron 900Mhz with 3x128MB SD100 and a 6GB HDD.
The NICs are 2x xl (3Com) and one time Ath0 (wlan).
which should be more than enough
It seams to be realy a problem with the userland pppd wich limits the
upload/download so
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:35:51PM +0200, Pablo Mar?n Ram?n wrote:
> > I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and
> > I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
> > enabled by default.
>
> Pros:
> * Improved performance
there are known scen
if there was only one partion with FAT, you#re out
of luck with any standard tool because the
fat is within the first 10 mb.
the are tools out there (google something like 'file
recovery FAT'), but I don't know whether such exist for
OpenBSD: In any case, the more fragmented the
FAT was, the le
> Is there a sysctl flag one can set to make sure that a panic'ing kernel writes
> a core? I have my ddb.panic set to 1 because I want the machine to come back
> when I'm not around, but this doesn't seem to dump core.
Kernel crash dumps are silently disabled if swap encryption is used.
You need
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:33:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any way to combine htaccess with one-time-pads?
Looks like a difficult task, as http is not session based. So, the
brower would ask for a new OTP on every GET request. This means not
only once per page, but multiple time
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to combine htaccess with one-time-pads?
>
>How about using mod_auth_radius and supporting S/Key or OTP in your
>RADIUS back-end? You allow the user to login with realm
>@skey.domain.ext, in order to let the RADIUS server sel
Hi,
Is there a sysctl flag one can set to make sure that a panic'ing kernel writes
a core? I have my ddb.panic set to 1 because I want the machine to come back
when I'm not around, but this doesn't seem to dump core.
Here my sysctl ddb:
ddb.radix=16
ddb.max_width=80
ddb.max_line=24
ddb.tab_stop
On 7/6/06, vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd and put Puffy into
that disk (dedicated install). The problem is tha
> On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> For now I can and will point out the followring:
>> The userland pppd simply just sucks.
>> Sorry but it becomes realy kind of unuseable if you`ve a... "faster"
>> line.
>>
>> I had a 2MBit ADSL-Connection (192kbit/s upload) and had no
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:52:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I wont blame the developers because they offen said the userland pppoe has
> a lot overhead but that`s simply a bad joke. :-(
Userland pppoe copies the pppoe session frame from kernel to userland via
bpf(4) into the pppoe(8) pro
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Philip Guenther wrote:
On 7/4/06, Chet Uber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The reason I had said anything is
that when I do forensic work I used to just do MD5's of files, but it
has gotten called to task in court so we now use both MD5 and SHA1
hashes as it is NP-complete t
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For now I can and will point out the followring:
The userland pppd simply just sucks.
Sorry but it becomes realy kind of unuseable if you`ve a... "faster" line.
I had a 2MBit ADSL-Connection (192kbit/s upload) and had no problem.
Now I`ve a
Hi all.
I have fd up the first 10Mb of the 3Gb fat disk
(not partition, the whole 3Gb disk) full of windoze
shit. Then, due to time limits, made some of sort
of backup of the mess with dd and put Puffy into
that disk (dedicated install). The problem is that
management needs some of that stuff
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to combine htaccess with one-time-pads?
How about using mod_auth_radius and supporting S/Key or OTP in your
RADIUS back-end? You allow the user to login with realm
@skey.domain.ext, in order to let the RADIUS server select
On 7/6/06, knitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd suspect some different issues than just blaming the implementation
of the daemon
sorry, this is of course not about the daemon, but the rest still applies
--knitti
> I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and
> I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
> enabled by default.
Pros:
* Improved performance
* Faster recovery latency after a crash
* Can handle a security problem that can occur (AFAIK) in ba
Is there any way to combine htaccess with one-time-pads?
The problem is the followring: Somebody wanna have acces to serval
statistics (provided via https). Unfortunately I`ve thos eproblems:
A VPN is no solution because this guy should have acces even from public
Computers (so storing a VPN-Key
On 06/07/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Last week I had the same problem switching to T-DSL. Unfortunately I
> > didn't
> > have time for debugging and left it with userland pppoe. But I would
> like
> > also
> > to use the kernel one.
>
> Thanks for all suggestions so far.
* Andreas Lundin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-06 00:44]:
> I'm about to deploy OpenOSPFD in a live environment and my question
> goes out to those who have used(or are using) OpenOSPFD that shipped
> with 3.9. It has been running it a lab enviroment for quite some time
> with only minor issues.
I
> Last week I had the same problem switching to T-DSL. Unfortunately I
> didn't
> have time for debugging and left it with userland pppoe. But I would like
> also
> to use the kernel one.
Thanks for all suggestions so far.
I4ll "investigate" it in the evening or some hours (depends to the work).
sa wrote:
+ afsd_ieee80211_newstate: bogus xmit rate 11 setup
You can reproduce this panic by changing from 11g to 11b.
I reported a quite similar pamic (SIC :) [1] some time ago, but
following source-changes (briefly), I have not seen any changes that I
think would solve it. In my case t
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:02:32AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pppoedev xl1
> !/sbin/ifconfig xl1 up
> !/usr/sbin/spppcontrol \$if myauthproto=pap myauthname=MYTEL \
> myauthkey=MYPASS
> !/sbin/ifconfig \$if inet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
> !/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1
> up
..
Last week I had the same problem switching to T-DSL. Unfortunately I didn't
have time for debugging and left it with userland pppoe. But I would like also
to use the kernel one.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:02:32 +0200 (CEST), sebastian.rother wrote
> Hello everybody,
>
> Lately I switched to a new ISP
On 7/4/06, Chet Uber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The reason I had said anything is
that when I do forensic work I used to just do MD5's of files, but it
has gotten called to task in court so we now use both MD5 and SHA1
hashes as it is NP-complete to find a collision in both of them for
the sa
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:04:02AM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
> tcpresets a connection and then brings the pppoe0 interface down and back up
> it's either in tcpreset(8) or in pppoe(4) that causes this. I'm going to send
Oops I meant tcpdrop(8) of course. (tcpreset was a script of mine once that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Lately I switched to a new ISP in germany wich provides much more bandwith
> (~18Mbit) then my old ISP (~2Mbit).
> Until now I use the pppD and not the kernel-pppoe.
> I read somewhere that the kernel-pppoe may should be better with such fast
> con
Hi,
I'm still getting these "data modified on freelist" messages but now I've been
able to pinpoint whereabouts it may lie. I run a script every minute that
tcpresets a connection and then brings the pppoe0 interface down and back up
in order to re-authenticate and get a new IP address.
When
Hello everybody,
Lately I switched to a new ISP in germany wich provides much more bandwith
(~18Mbit) then my old ISP (~2Mbit).
Until now I use the pppD and not the kernel-pppoe.
I read somewhere that the kernel-pppoe may should be better with such fast
connections so I tried to configure it.
I s
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:08:43AM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:37:56PM +0200, FTP wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the dovecot ports pkg is a bit 'old' but would it make sense to istall this
> > and then make a second installation from the current source? Does the port
> >
I have seen no feedback on this kernel panic.
I'd like to know if this could be a kernel bug or it may be caused by
some hardware problem.
Thanks.
Original Message
Subject: Kernel Panic with 3.9-stable MP
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:37:32 +0200
From: Federico Giannici <[EMAIL
Hi,
I just got me a Ralink minipci for my Soekris 4501. Chipset is:
begin
ral0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "Ralink RT2561" rev 0x00: irq 10, address
00:08:a1:xx:xx:xx
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2661B, RF RT2527
end
I'm running a 3.9-current snapshot (5 June).
I got it working in 11b without a pro
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:32:13AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/07/06 00:13, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > The OS shouldn't use the disk much, but adding CF will make your server
> > more complex, more expensive, and slower. I really don't see the point.
>
> OTOH, if files on the HD are
Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Meanwhile, ipsecctl has gained support for pre-shared key
authentication.
So in 3.9, things are simpler still:
Sounds great and thx a lot for your help :-))
For those who are interested and have wifi windows xp clients.
Recently I came across a t
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:43:46PM -0500, Patrick McNamee wrote:
> I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 stable, arch i386. Also
> autoconf-2.59. I'd install the nmap package, but
> it's an older version.
>
> When I run ./configure --with-openssl=/usr/sbin/ I get a
> number of warnings like the following:
Try
Never had any problems with RHINE nic's :)
-Original message-
From: Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:35:36 +0300
To: Edgars [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mikrotik's routerboard 44
> > Mikrotik uses VIA RHINE chipset, so it must work :)
>
> Why people would expect
> Mikrotik uses VIA RHINE chipset, so it must work :)
Why people would expect Via Rhine ethernet interfaces to work is beyond me.
Everyone should know that ``rhine'' is an abbreviation for ``avoid me at
all costs''.
Miod
On 2006/07/05 21:45, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > I'm in the process of building firewall (Obviously it will run OpenBSD)
> >and I need to put in a quad NIC card. There's Intel Quad card that I had
> >a success with in the past but is expensive as hell. I found a company
> >called Mikrotik that mak
Hi!
Mikrotik uses VIA RHINE chipset, so it must work :)
Would be great to get working openbsd on Mikrotik Routerboard 5xx with IDT
MIPS32 cpu :)
-Original message-
From: Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 04:45:42 +0300
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Mikrotik's ro
87 matches
Mail list logo
