Firstly, Thank you Tim and Stuart for the great advice.
Secondly, sorry for spamming the wrong tree.
I find myself at another cross road, that is that I can not find the
driver files under /usr/src/sys/dev/pci. Let me just admit that I
havent searched hard enough yet, thought I'd post this
thus Chris Kuethe spake:
On 8/2/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i have an amd64 system running for about six months now flawlessly
(however, due to following -current, not with uptimes 10 days).
today it crashed twice when i had two torrents active (not very big
ones, one
Hi,
I've got some trouble with in-kernel pppoe and adsl.
From time to time the connection just hangs up:
# grep pppoe /var/log/messages
[...]
Jul 26 09:41:21 dslgw /bsd: pppoe0: LCP keepalive timeout
Jul 26 10:34:51 dslgw /bsd: pppoe0: LCP keepalive timeout
Jul 26 10:34:57 dslgw /bsd: pppoe0: pap
is there any other way of getting ftp+ssl to pass normally on a bsd box?
soul.
Die Gestalt wrote:
All I can tell you is I had for a while a ftp + ssl server running
(and yes ftp + ssl is useful in some scenarii) behind a pf machine and
it all worked perfectly well.
The problem is that
Is there any solution for connecting web via Microsoft ISA Server?
I''ve got on at my office, and the only app successfuly comming
through is Firefox, while all the rest can't.
Setting HTTP_PROXY=http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 doesn't help.
--
.0.
..0
000
Hello,
Running Openbsd 4.1 i386 as a firewall/nat box. I have connected to it a 6
mbps DSL pppoe connection.
The pppoe works fine, as do all machines behind the openbsd box, they all
can max out the 6mbps.
But, transfers directly on the openbsd box (wget, ftp, whatever) all are
limited to
You mean with or without ftp-proxy?
On 8/3/07, soulshepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any other way of getting ftp+ssl to pass normally on a bsd box?
soul.
Die Gestalt wrote:
All I can tell you is I had for a while a ftp + ssl server running
(and yes ftp + ssl is useful in some
On 8/3/07, Daniel Melameth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is likely a BPD issue--see
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=111910098716125w=2 for details.
Yep, that fixes it.
Always someone better out there at searching than yourself. :-)
Thank you. (and wow at the quickness!) :-)
Mark
just out of curiosity...
did you try kernel pppoe?
man 4 pppoe
I found that to be much faster and more robust than userland
pppoe, but still doesnt explain your issue...
CPU usage dramatically dropped when using kernelmode pppoe.
-JD
At 08:42 AM 8/3/2007 -0400, M. Parsons wrote:
Hello,
hi,
On 03:22 03 Aug 07, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
Is there any solution for connecting web via Microsoft ISA Server?
I''ve got on at my office, and the only app successfuly comming
through is Firefox, while all the rest can't.
Setting HTTP_PROXY=http://username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8080 doesn't
On 2007/08/03 15:27, Hugo van Niekerk wrote:
[...]
pcn(4) can be persuaded to send frames large enough to hold vlan tags
and a 1500-byte packet with the diff below, but on the vmware I just
tried, I can't get it to receive frames that size. Then again, neither
does em(4) with Ethernet0.virtualDev
On 2007/08/03 15:45, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/08/03 08:11, Michael Gale wrote:
We are currently testing out OpenBSD 4.1 and have a requirement where
we
need to support multiple PPTP connections to a single server where the
clients are behind a single NAT device.
On 2007/08/03 08:11, Michael Gale wrote:
We are currently testing out OpenBSD 4.1 and have a requirement where
we
need to support multiple PPTP connections to a single server where the
clients are behind a single NAT device.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/frickin/
On 8/3/07, JD Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just out of curiosity...
did you try kernel pppoe?
My fault for not saying I already am using kernel pppoe (and yes I find it
to be very low on CPU usage)
Clearing out pf doesnt seem to help either.
Mark
Well, looks like I was doing something wrong, 'cause now I'm
connecting OK with http_proxy set to ISA Server (as well as to local
ntlmaps).
Still no connection avaliable on ICQ (the same configuration
--
.0.
..0
000
Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:23:59PM +0200, Sven Ulland wrote:
I'm very (that's putting it mildly) interested in the issues with 4.0
that you mention. Would you be able to shed some more light on which
issues they were, or point me to references? It would be most
Hi,
try Ntlmaps from http://ntlmaps.sourceforge.net/
Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
Is there any solution for connecting web via Microsoft ISA Server?
I''ve got on at my office, and the only app successfuly comming
through is Firefox, while all the rest can't.
Setting
Sorry, I'm Running 4.1 (-STABLE from 1. March) on i386.
On Friday 03 August 2007 10:10, Chris Cohen wrote:
Hi,
I've got some trouble with in-kernel pppoe and adsl.
From time to time the connection just hangs up:
# grep pppoe /var/log/messages
[...]
Jul 26 09:41:21 dslgw /bsd: pppoe0: LCP
hello,
i'm looking for a server compatability list. Does there exists an
offical one?
I only found
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html
which only covers a few servers.
mfG
-- stefan --
hi all, i have this problem, on hp proliant dl585 g2 (is a server with 4
amd opteron dual core and 8gb ecc ram, the bios recognizing all ram) i try
to run openbsd 4.1 and openbsd 4.2-beta but only recognize 2gb ram
i try to run obsd without mp but the problem don't change... so i try the
Hi Ronnie,
Now i wonder if i still can use 4.1-release packages, from any mirror.
Set up $PKG_PATH to point at your favo(u)rite mirror. Depending on your
architecture, you get updated packages with `pkg_add -ui`.
The answer, in short, is 'yes, but check for updates'.
HTH... Nico
On 2007/07/31 22:01, Tom Cosgrove wrote:
This diff fixes a long-standing interoperability issue between OpenBSD
isakmpd and Cisco IOS (and possibly others).
possibly others includes zyxel 662, and this fixes it.
Hello,
I was used to run only -release systems until yesterday. I updated to
4.1-stable, built a release, and installed other fresh 4.1-stable systems.
Now i wonder if i still can use 4.1-release packages, from any mirror.
Reading http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors make me feel that
On Friday 03 August 2007 10:38, you wrote:
Hi Chris,
* Chris Cohen wrote/schrieb:
Would really like to provide a dmesg but the pppoe messages flooded away
the boot messages.
I can't really answer your question, but you can find the boot dmesg
in /var/run/dmesg.boot
Nope, It's also full
Hey,
We are currently testing out OpenBSD 4.1 and have a requirement where we need to support multiple PPTP connections to a single server where the clients are behind a single
NAT device. It does not look like OpenBSD can support this requirement, are my assumptions correct ?
I came across
On 8/3/07, Die Gestalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean with or without ftp-proxy?
On 8/3/07, soulshepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any other way of getting ftp+ssl to pass normally on a bsd box?
[snip]
A way to pass sslized ftp has been suggested in
On 8/3/07, M. Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running Openbsd 4.1 i386 as a firewall/nat box. I have connected to it a 6
mbps DSL pppoe connection.
The pppoe works fine, as do all machines behind the openbsd box, they all
can max out the 6mbps.
But, transfers directly on the openbsd box
Michael Gale [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are currently testing out OpenBSD 4.1 and have a
requirement where we need to support multiple PPTP connections to a
single server where the clients are behind a single NAT device. It
does not look like OpenBSD can support this requirement, are
Hi,
I've got a setup on two i386 family PCs with 4.1-stable which includes
the following:
Internet 1 - p1 - r1 -- r2 - p2 - Internet 2
r1 and r2 have an iBGP session running, and the Internet connections go
to different ISPs, running eBGP on each (r1-p1, r2-p2). I receive full
Has named(8) on OpenBSD ever used randomized source ports for DNS
queries? I thought for some reason it had and noticed today that this
probably was not right:
10.0.1.2.34140 192.35.51.30.53: 64395% [1au] ? sec1.apnic.net. (43)
10.0.1.2.34140 192.0.34.126.53: 50119% [1au] ?
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:09:58PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
[...]
I misdiagnosed the problem. In the meantime I got another report with
a dd of the partition which enabled me to diagnose the problem and
make a fix for 4.1. Please test and report back. I'll be on vacation
from Saturday, so
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 07:56:02PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
I've got a setup on two i386 family PCs with 4.1-stable which includes
the following:
Internet 1 - p1 - r1 -- r2 - p2 - Internet 2
r1 and r2 have an iBGP session running, and the Internet connections go
to
for more info
http://www.kneipen-suche.com/berlin-tuffstein-5160.html
2007/7/31, Gabriel Kihlman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dirk Fohrenkamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ok, to write something not that OT: time? date? location? (as you know I
have quite a lot bars and restaurants around)
I think we
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
nothing.
man spamd and a quick search in the ML
On 2007/08/03 13:59, Tom Bombadil wrote:
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
Editing the binary? (Is recompiling really so hard?)
Sorry to bug you guys with this lame problem but in the financial
world, people can be very touchy
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
nothing.
man spamd and a quick
writes Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: spamd - 250 return text
...
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
...
Sure. It's called bvi.
-Marcus Watts
On 8/3/07, Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Short of recompiling spamd, is there any undocumented way of changing
the 250 responses from spamd?
- 250 Hello, spam sender. Pleased to be wasting your time.
- 250 You are about to try to deliver spam. Your time will be spent, for
So the patch works, and this problem seems serious and easy to encounter, i
vote for moving it to stable.
- Original Message -
From: Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: fsck
Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
case SIOCSIFMTU:
- if (ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMTU || ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMIN)
+ if (ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMTU + ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN ||
+ ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMIN)
error = EINVAL;
I don't spend as much time following OpenBSD as I used to, so perhaps
I'm missing something. But there used to be a ports-security mailing
list used for announcing updated ports. That list doesn't exist any
more, or at least doesn't appear to have had anything posted to it in a
very long time. Is
On 2007/08/03 16:18, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
case SIOCSIFMTU:
- if (ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMTU || ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMIN)
+ if (ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMTU + ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN ||
+ ifr-ifr_mtu ETHERMIN)
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:35:51PM -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
I don't spend as much time following OpenBSD as I used to, so
perhaps I'm missing something. But there used to be a
ports-security mailing list used for announcing updated ports.
That list doesn't exist any more, or at least doesn't
On 2007/08/03 18:54, Will Maier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:35:51PM -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
I don't spend as much time following OpenBSD as I used to, so
perhaps I'm missing something. But there used to be a
ports-security mailing list used for announcing updated ports.
That list
Editing the binary? (Is recompiling really so hard?)
Not hard, just changed it right now... But sometimes it pays to ask
around to see if there is a simpler way that doesn't involve messing
around with the original source code.
Ah, you'll be looking for the OpenBSD Corporate Edition - with
--- Quoting HDC on 2007/08/02 at 20:26 -0300:
Read this...
http://www.packetmischief.ca/openbsd/doc/raidadmin/http://www.packetmischief
.ca/openbsd/
I used to use raidframe and followed the procedures in that doc for
doing so, but now there's no point. If the system requires any type of
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 01:10:24AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/08/03 18:54, Will Maier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:35:51PM -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
I don't spend as much time following OpenBSD as I used to, so
perhaps I'm missing something. But there used to be a
Network Working Group J. Evers
Internet-Draft Bantown Consulting, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track November 2006
Expires: May 5, 2007
A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 18:35 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
Is there some other official way to track changes to
ports?
Thanks for all the responses. I went with the tracking system on
ports.openbsd.nu. While I understand and admire the whole follow the
source approach of watching cvs, my servers are
Todd Pytel wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 18:35 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
Is there some other official way to track changes to
ports?
Thanks for all the responses. I went with the tracking system on
ports.openbsd.nu. While I understand and admire the whole follow the
source approach of watching
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:35:51PM -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
I don't spend as much time following OpenBSD as I used to, so perhaps
I'm missing something. But there used to be a ports-security mailing
list used for announcing updated ports. That list doesn't exist any
more, or at least doesn't
51 matches
Mail list logo
