On 2007-10-04, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you just set five data bits, no parity, CSTOPB, and you'll be
> fine. Just why you would need this is beyond me, though. The only
> application that comes to mind is interfacing with 50-year-old
> teletype equipment.
Thanks for
On 10/4/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/4/07, James Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In /etc/ntpd.conf, the only line left enabled is:
> >
> > sensor cuaU0
>
> nope "sensor nmea0"
Noted & changed to the above.
> > In /etc/rc.conf.local, the only lines are:
>
On 10/4/07, James Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After reading the manpages for ntpd(8), ntpd.conf(5), & nmeaattach(8),
> I thought I had enough information to use a USB GPS device as a time
> source.
>
> In /etc/ntpd.conf, the only line left enabled is:
>
> sensor cuaU0
nope "se
After reading the manpages for ntpd(8), ntpd.conf(5), & nmeaattach(8),
I thought I had enough information to use a USB GPS device as a time
source.
In /etc/ntpd.conf, the only line left enabled is:
sensor cuaU0
In /etc/rc.conf.local, the only lines are:
nmeaattach cuaU0
Dual-homed firewall, web server on the private network, firewall is
doing 1:1 NAT for the web server to the public interface of the
firewall. em0 is the public interface, em1 is the private one.
In the exact same setup (same hardware even) I am comparing Linux and
OpenBSD for a firewall. Insta
Stuart my first two units are on their way what method would give me a better
understanding of the benefits of the 1401/11
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart Henderson
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 7:07 PM
To: Brian A. Seklecki
Cc:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Hello all,
I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my
P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in the 486 along with a 1 GB
drive.
I'm on dialup and would like to avoid a bad partitioning decision
requring a whole new install/download cycle
On 2007/10/04 16:32, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> On an semi-related note, I recently tested the vpn1411 in a
> significantly faster (2.8GHz P4 Celeron D):
>
> des3/3des:
>
> w/ acceleration:
>
> # time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1m count=100 | openssl des3 -pass pass:test
^
T
Last call for hardware. I got a few responses but nothing firm. I'm giving
these away to a guy here locally if I don't get any response from y'all. I
have a sparc 20, 10, 5, 4, 2 all seem to be in working condition. I have 3
or 4 sparc classics, 3 external scsi hard drives, and a sparc tape dri
I'm bitter because I can't run java on it. I have to use ubuntu with
VirtualBox to run some critical work apps that use java :(
--
~Allie D.
On Thu, October 4, 2007 15:41, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> Gerald Thornberry wrote:
>> I've never used QEMU so I may be talking out my hat. Looking at the
Gerald Thornberry wrote:
I've never used QEMU so I may be talking out my hat. Looking at the
docs for it yesterday I remember seeing something about the QEMU
accelerator. Is that an option here?
"When used as a virtualizer, QEMU achieves near native performances by
executing the guest code dir
Hello
Recently I've had problems because my firewall (4.1-stable) has hit
states limit. I was surprised when I found nothing in logs (debug
urgent) . Is it intented or is it an oversight ?
Regards
Piotrek
I've noticed a few of these PF log entries that were logging traffic
passed and containing IP options:
Sep 30 22:52:12.586548 rule 32/(ip-option) [uid 0, pid 9872] pass in on sis1:
10.0.1.23.1031 > x.x.13.31.1: [udp sum ok] udp 68 (ttl 255, id 5,
len 100, optlen=4 IPOPT-148{4})
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:11 AM, a.padilla wrote:
Hi, I'm a student trying to learn pf on my own. I'm trying to set
up a nat. I've read documentation yet I still can't get the
internal machine to communicate to the outside world.
I've been following this documentation: http://www.openbsd.org
> Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On an semi-related note, I recently tested the vpn1411 in a
significantly faster (2.8GHz P4 Celeron D):
des3/3des:
w/ acceleration:
# time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1m count=100 | openssl des3 -pass pass:test
-engine cryptodev -out /dev/null
engine "cryptodev
Ahrgh. The show's already over. A missed opportunity, but nevermind.
The reason why I didn't call them myself, is that I'm not qualified --
I sort of dimly remember the discussion, but I don't really know
enough about the issues.
Oh, and I got the phone number wrong, sorry. That number was for SM
Brian Candler wrote:
> I would argue that OpenBSD is probably the least "free" of all
> the free Unix options out there. Why?
>
> * You cannot download an ISO image and burn it yourself.
> * If you buy a CD-ROM, you cannot legally make copies to give to
> your friends, your school etc.
You mix u
Marc Balmer wrote:
why are you on our mailing lists?
Because he has the freedom to?
Hello,
I'm busy setting up vsftpd on my OpenBSD 4.1 server, using virtual
users, and as adviced on
ftp://vsftpd.beasts.org/users/cevans/untar/vsftpd-2.0.5/EXAMPLE/VIRTUAL_USERS/README
, with pam.
However, it seems pam does not exist on OpenBSD, because of security problems.
What would you advice
On 10/4/07, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To the original poster: can you get your friend to ask about these
> > things for us? *Did* Yahoo India buy the OpenBSD discs or did it just
> > download them? Is there a large OpenBSD
On 10/4/07, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To the original poster: can you get your friend to ask about these
> things for us? *Did* Yahoo India buy the OpenBSD discs or did it just
> download them? Is there a large OpenBSD presence or is the desktop an
> odd one-off installed by the
> http://code.google.com/p/bsd-appliance/wiki/HardwareVendorsAxi
> omtekNA820
>
> http://code.google.com/p/bsd-appliance/wiki/HardwareVendorsNex
> comNSA1085
>
Very solid machines that we run for two years too.
Kevin
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:54 +0200, Piotrek Kapczuk wrote:
> 2007/10/4, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm demo'ing some 1U P4-class network appliance hardware that will
> > probably fit your needs well. See URLs below.
> [...]
>
> > http://code.google.com/p/bsd-appliance/wiki/Hardw
make sure you have IP forwarding setup in your /etc/sysctl.conf
Nat is pretty easy in pf once forwarding is setup
nat on $EXTERNALINTERFACE inet from $INTERNELNETWORK to any ->
$EXTERNALINTERFACE
where $EXTERNALINTERFACE and $INTERNALNETWORK is your interface settings.
James
- Origina
pf/nat.html
before I go any further, is this the correct place to ask this sort of
question?
__ NOD32 2571 (20071004) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Can you include your pf.conf and dmesg?
2007/10/4, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm demo'ing some 1U P4-class network appliance hardware that will
> probably fit your needs well. See URLs below.
[...]
> http://code.google.com/p/bsd-appliance/wiki/HardwareVendorsAxiomtekNA820
>
> http://code.google.com/p/bsd-appliance/wiki/
On Oct 03 19:27:59, Brian Candler wrote:
> The reason nobody makes free OpenBSD ISO images, I presume, is because
> the user base is comparatively tiny, and it's not worth the effort.
Do you mean the effort of running rsync && mkisofs,
or the effort of writing a trivial shell script wrapper around
On 10/4/07, a.padilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm a student trying to learn pf on my own. I'm trying to set up
> a nat. I've read documentation yet I still can't get the internal
> machine to communicate to the outside world.
>
> I've been following this documentation: http://www.openbs
I've never used QEMU so I may be talking out my hat. Looking at the
docs for it yesterday I remember seeing something about the QEMU
accelerator. Is that an option here?
"When used as a virtualizer, QEMU achieves near native performances by
executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. A ho
"a.padilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I'm a student trying to learn pf on my own. I'm trying to set up
> a nat. I've read documentation yet I still can't get the internal
> machine to communicate to the outside world.
First thing to check: what are your pass rules?
> before I go any f
Hi, I'm a student trying to learn pf on my own. I'm trying to set up
a nat. I've read documentation yet I still can't get the internal
machine to communicate to the outside world.
I've been following this documentation: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/
nat.html
before I go any further, is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There'll be two main servers, a web server and a sql server. We have to
insert a timestamp and a signature in the specified rows of tables.
Periodically the sql server will make pdf documents from the data and we
have to sign and timestamp these docs t
On 10/4/07, Julian Leyh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC, you can't use vnd0 for partitions, somehow it causes problems. But
> if you use vnd1 or a higher number, it should just work.
About the only reason I could see for that being the case is that the
release(8) process is hard-coded to use vnd
Indeed, this is a FoxPro program. I had tried changing the path; and
tested it by starting program without using full path to EXE - although
the program does startup this way; it still fails at the same point.
I also tried QEMU; but was still researching options before bringing
speed question
Julian Leyh wrote:
On 12:25 Wed 03 Oct , Chris Kuethe wrote:
The developer of whom you speak may be slightly misinformed, or just
hasn't tried it. There is no need to mention names, but as of ...
hmmm... 2 minutes ago, i was able to use vnd to encrypt an entire
partition.
IIRC, you
Alexey Vatchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How is it possible to set 1.5 stopbits in tcsetattr(3) ?
> The only thing that i found related to stopbits is CSTOPB (2 stopbits).
> But iirc 5 databits can be used in conjunction with 1 or 1.5 stopbits.
UARTs derived from the Intel 8250 (i.e., PC "CO
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 15:24 +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Tang Tse wrote:
>
> > Just one question regarding VPNs OpenBSD and HW, is there any recomendation
> > for hardware? i mean, i want to setup a VPN between 2 offices and i need
> > some reasonable speed.. with a computer with some recent hardwa
There is a lot of work in racoon(8) as a server and client on Cisco
proprietary extensions. I haven't tested it in about 10 weeks, though.
You'll want to run the trunk source code from ipsec-tools if you test
it. I'm not sure if the ipsec(4) stack in OpenBSD 4.x will work with
racoon, though.
~B
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:39:57AM -0300, Marcus Andree wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put
Tang Tse wrote:
Just one question regarding VPNs OpenBSD and HW, is there any recomendation
for hardware? i mean, i want to setup a VPN between 2 offices and i need
some reasonable speed.. with a computer with some recent hardware do i need
any vpn card to accelerate encryptation/decryptation?
Hi again!
Just one question regarding VPNs OpenBSD and HW, is there any recomendation
for hardware? i mean, i want to setup a VPN between 2 offices and i need
some reasonable speed.. with a computer with some recent hardware do i need
any vpn card to accelerate encryptation/decryptation?
thanks!
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:21:09PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Gabri Mati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've read a lot about timestamping a document, but dunno how it works in
> > practice. How can i apply a timestamp to a digitally signed or encrypted
> > document? Like i encrypt or
T|rk Patent Enstit|s| ve Mopolistan Fikri M|lkiyet Ofisi Dayan}~mas}
T|rk Patent Enstit|s| (TPE) ve Mopolistan Fikri M|lkiyet Ofisi (IPOM)
aras}ndaki teknik i~birlipi gvr|~meleri 21-23 Apustos 2007 tarihlerinde
Mopolistan'}n Ulan Batur ~ehrinde gergekle~tirildi. IPOM personelinin coprafi
i~aretl
"Marcus Andree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you're trying to install OpenBSD on a 486 machine just to keep your
> proficience levels, why not just virtualize it on whatever is the OS that will
> boot the P-II?
I suppose the real answer to that is along the lines of
'there is nothing that
On 10/4/07, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:46:01PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I have a 486DX4-100 with 32 MB ram. I bought an 8 GB drive to put in my
> > > P-II and it won't boot it so I've put in in
My scenario is this:
ifconfig sis0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig carp0 10.0.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 vhid 1
ifconfig carp1 10.0.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 vhid 2 (two carp
interfaces because I can't have carp with 2 or more IP addresses)
ifconfig sis1 172.16.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
On 12:25 Wed 03 Oct , Chris Kuethe wrote:
> The developer of whom you speak may be slightly misinformed, or just
> hasn't tried it. There is no need to mention names, but as of ...
> hmmm... 2 minutes ago, i was able to use vnd to encrypt an entire
> partition.
IIRC, you can't use vnd0 for par
Joachim Schipper wrote:
> ...
> Sendmail is a lot better. And something like Postfix is even sane ;-).
Indeed, you should already be running Postfix, Exim or Sendmail in front
to collects, queue and store the messages and to limit contact with the
net.
> However, integrating all that with a compl
Hi guys!
I'm adding serial port support to my ``netfwd''
(http://www.bsdua.org/netfwd.html) and faced a problem.
How is it possible to set 1.5 stopbits in tcsetattr(3) ?
The only thing that i found related to stopbits is CSTOPB (2 stopbits). But iirc
5 databits can be used in conjunction with 1 o
I do not know much about wine, but the issue interested me ... I've
built from ports and
I am having a look.
From the manual page, re. the wine configuration file, it has this:
format: path =
default: C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM
Used to specify the path which will be use
50 matches
Mail list logo
