On Nov 16, 2007 7:20 AM, Weldon Goree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 00:28 -0500, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
> > I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if
> > everyone
> > send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the " To " field.
> >
> > Please send em
Hi,
On 16/11/2007, Zoong PHAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
Where did you get this idea from? It's in the sets.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
On 16/11/2007, at 7:20 PM, Weldon Goree wrote:
If only there were mail clients that allowed one to filter on To: or
Cc:...
And automatically added dripping tags?
Hi there,
I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
I have a 3 disk volume. If I remove one disk from the machine and
boot it up, this is the result:
---8<---
# dmesg | grep softraid0
softraid0 at root
softraid0: not assembling partial disk that used to be volume 0
# bioctl softrai
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:40:29PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
> > > could someone test this before i submit a bug report?
> >
> > I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
> > prefer to have it
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 11:43:38 +0100, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
> i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
> and must be terminated.
yes.
> ntpd_flags="-s"
> could someone test
hi there,
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
/etc/rc.conf.local:
ntpd_flags="-s"
/etc/hostname.rl0:
dhcp NONE NONE NONE
otherwise a stock 4.2 install.
could someone test
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
> i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
> and must be terminated.
>
> /etc/rc.conf.local:
> ntpd_flags="-s"
>
> /etc/
Hi Jan,
Sorry for the delay, I overlooked your reply
If I use exactly the same commands / mount options as you I get less than
1MB/s
I know that I cannot expect a "good" performance with the CF card, but 5MB/s
would just be fine :-)
What else can I try?
Greetings
Stefan
My confi
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:25:40PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-16 12:39]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 11:43:38 +0100, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net acces
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Weldon Goree
Sent: 16 November 2007 08:20 AM
To: Piet Slaghekke
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Please send email directly to misc@openBSD.org (no cc
please)
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 00:28 -0500, Piet Slaghekk
On Friday, 16 November 2007 at 10:52:41 +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 16/11/2007, Zoong PHAM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
>
> Where did you get this idea from? It's in the sets.
Sorry about the confusion, I missed that.
It is really in th
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:13:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:40:29PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
> > > > could someone test this before i submit a bug report?
> > >
> > > I've removed the '-
On 16/11/2007, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hijacking the thread a bit:
I'll say :P
> Do all your disks need to be the same size
> to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
> about that.
I assume so.
I could not work out a way of rebuilding inconsistent vo
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
> > i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
> > an
I have a problem with ipsec/isakmpd.
I have setup about 20 vpn's to various other sites, all using tunnel mode (
active ).
All but one are working fine.
One connection exhibits the following behaviour:
After isakmpd starts, the vpn starts correctly, main and quick mode are
successfully negotiat
(-:
Ok, Ok I love the responses to this request and I get the point (-:
Not such a good request.
I have listed the responses here (-: (note: classifications are the
sole opinion of this writer and may or may not be shared by others)
thanks everyone for the help on the "removing a list users
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
Are you sure this did not happen before?
I'
Piet Slaghekke wrote:
I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if everyone
send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the " To " field.
Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this address.
Why has no-one mentioned filtering on X-Loop tag? It wor
Stefan Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I use exactly the same commands / mount options as you I get less than
> 1MB/s
>
> I know that I cannot expect a "good" performance with the CF card, but 5MB/s
> would just be fine :-)
I've started playing with a CF in a bigger machine, and the
* Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-16 12:39]:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 11:43:38 +0100, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
> > i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
> > a
On 2007/11/16 14:10, Stefan Klein wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I overlooked your reply
>
> If I use exactly the same commands / mount options as you I get less than
> 1MB/s
>
> I know that I cannot expect a "good" performance with the CF card, but 5MB/s
> would just be fine :-)
You can
hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
> > could someone test this before i submit a bug report?
>
> I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
> prefer to have it in place in the case that I have net access. I don't
> know whether it woul
Piet Slaghekke wrote:
> I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if everyone
> send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the " To " field.
>
> Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this address.
>
> Thanks!
wow. You ask one novice question and yo
Piet Slaghekke wrote:
> I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it
> is if everyone send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the "
> To " field.
>
> Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this
> address.
>
> Thanks!
I've been struggeling with this as well,
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 00:28 -0500, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
> I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if everyone
> send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the " To " field.
>
> Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this address.
>
> Thanks!
If on
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:01:13AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 11/16/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
> >
>
> Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
> to use softraid? softra
On 11/16/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
>
Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
about that.
-Nick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:45:04PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 16/11/2007, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hijacking the thread a bit:
>
> I'll say :P
>
> > Do all your disks need to be the same size
> > to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
> > about
I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
to the area that isn't clear?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:29:20AM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
> however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -e
On 11/16/07, Chris Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
> however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
> working to accomplish, and commands to use).
>
> Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started
(-:
OK, OK, I love the responses to this request and I get the point (-: Not
such a good request.
I have listed the responses here (-: *(note: classifications are the sole
opinion of this writer and may or may not be shared by others)*
**
*thanks everyone for the help on the **"removing a l
Hi gang,
So I'm setting up my first wireless network for a small business with
OpenBSD acting as internet gateway. I am familiar with OpenBSD as
gateway but not in the wireless context. I picked myself up a card
that the docs say is supported (Linksys WMP54G) and will be installing
4.2 from my C
On Nov 16, 2007 2:14 AM, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:23:45PM +0100, Andreas Andersson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
> > Charset: ISO-8859-1
> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
Hi all,
I try since a few days to setting up IPsec for my wireless network. The
internet gateway has a ral(4) device :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ ifconfig ral0
ral0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:18:f8:a5:f3:34
description: WLAN Link
groups: wlan
media: IEEE802.11 auto
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:42:11AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
>
> I have a 3 disk volume. If I remove one disk from the machine and
> boot it up, this is the result:
>
> ---8<---
> # dmesg | grep softraid0
> softraid0 at root
I have to agree with Girish. Take some time and find out the average
bandwidth for your link. Then set the higher priority users a higher
percentage of the total amount than the other users.
You could also use a script. If you know what the current upload bandwidth
amount is then you could vary t
I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
working to accomplish, and commands to use).
Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started so I can be of some use?
Chris
Fernando,
Doing a quick google search I see other people have also reported problems
with the on board Broadcom BCM5708 on the dells. Can you try another
network card like the Intel Pro/1000 MT (OpenBSD interface name: em0) ?
My place of business transfers an average of 450Mbit with OpenBSD 4.1/
instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
just use svnd with a file.
I have a SanDisk Extreme III 2GB (at least I think it's III) in my
Soekris net5501 :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ dd if=/dev/zero of=nulls bs=65536 count=1600
1600+0 records in
1600+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 8.604 secs (12186647 bytes/sec)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ dd if=nulls of=/dev/null bs=
On 11/16/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:01:13AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
> >
> > Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
> > to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
> > about that.
>
> No you d
> IIRC, the SanDisk above is from their "Ultra II" line. I wonder
> how the newer "Extreme III" and "Extreme IV" perform.
In my reply to Stefan, it's a SanDisk Extreme III (2GB).
Jan
> Who is talking about using windows apps?
>
> I just said I ported it work in cygwin so that I don't have to "use"
> windows at work. GNU userland beats even MS cli commands.
>
why cygwin & not uwin or sfu??
cygwin is such a poor performer
___
Oh I guess I should elaborate on that :-)
What happens is that the larger disks gets coerced into a smaller size.
So you lose the excess capacity at the end of the disk.
I am actually working on a raid concat that you can use to claim all
unused space and make it into a larger disk but my first p
On Nov 16 20:07:16, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> I have a SanDisk Extreme III 2GB (at least I think it's III) in my
> Soekris net5501 :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ dd if=/dev/zero of=nulls bs=65536 count=1600
> 1600+0 records in
> 1600+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 8.604 secs (12186647 byte
On Nov 16, 2007 12:36 AM, Clint Pachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nonetheless, the bonnie++ results may provide some insight to the
> problem for an experienced guru. What I found interesting is that the
> CPU usage is really low for writes and rewrites when svnd is backed by
> the whole disk. Th
On 16/11/2007, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You did find a bug; that is removing the disk and rebooting it and then
> reinserting it. I am not sure how you did it but it should have
> complained that your raid set is only partially there. Can you
> elaborate on you actual steps an
I thought the manpage was just covering things that worked well, and in
the code itself were things waiting to be tested better. It shows a "3
chunk raid 1" setup, but doesn't mention anything about hot standby. I'm
not aware of 3 disk RAID 1 otherwise.
Also, for some reason (I think past misc
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:26:32PM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I thought the manpage was just covering things that worked well, and in
> the code itself were things waiting to be tested better. It shows a "3
> chunk raid 1" setup, but doesn't mention anything about hot standby. I'm
> not aware
My sandisks are quite fast (8MB/s or more, though I just
had to throw a fairly new SDCFJ-1024 out with read errors?!)
- I have a newish kingston which is slow (1.5MB/s "elite
pro cf/1GB-S 50x") - and a bunch of assorted old 32-64MB
cards, the majority of which are reasonably quick
(fujifilm, sandis
On 2007/11/16 12:49, Calomel wrote:
> I have to agree with Girish. Take some time and find out the average
> bandwidth for your link.
...
> You could also use a script. If you know what the current upload bandwidth
> amount is then you could vary the "altq on $ExtIf bandwidth 744Kb" line to
> refle
hasn't that been talked about a dozen times lately...
* Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-14 11:33]:
> I recall hearing tell (on here I think) that amd64 is a better arch for
> routing, because of better interrupt handling or somesuch. Is this true?
i386 used too be much better. it is t
On 11/16/07, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
> just use svnd with a file.
Yeah but doesn't this hint at some horrible inefficiency in the stack somewhere?
-Nick
On Nov 16, 2007 1:32 PM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
> just use svnd with a file.
Well, I think he just found the itch. Now the question is whether
he'll scratch it, or will someone else find it interesting enough to
On 11/16/07, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/16/07, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
> > just use svnd with a file.
>
> Yeah but doesn't this hint at some horrible inefficiency in the stack
> somewhere?
I have ospf running between OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC.MP#304 i386 and a 1721
Cisco running c1700-k9o3sy7-mz.123-23.bin. "ospfctl show fib ospf"
shows 2 networks, the loopbacks and the gre link however "ospfctl show
database area 0.0.0.0" shows only the loopbacks, why doesn't the
database show the gre lin
Hi,
I was wondering if the 3ware 8006-2LP is supported in 4.2.
The http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html page only lists 5x00, 6x00 and 7x00
as supported devices, but the man page says that 8000 is supported as well.
(just trying to find a cheap SATA hardware raid card...)
Thanks !
Pawel.
On Nov 16, 2007 2:39 PM, Juan Miscaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> So I'm setting up my first wireless network for a small business with
> OpenBSD acting as internet gateway. I am familiar with OpenBSD as
> gateway but not in the wireless context. I picked myself up a card
> that the
On 16 Nov 2007 at 16:36, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if the 3ware 8006-2LP is supported in 4.2.
> The http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html page only lists 5x00, 6x00 and
> 7x00
> as supported devices, but the man page says that 8000 is supported as
> well.
>
> (just trying to find
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:15:22PM -0500, System Administrator wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2007 at 16:36, Pawel Veselov wrote:
> > (just trying to find a cheap SATA hardware raid card...)
>
> Executive summary: Find another card or use soft-raid.
>
> The long answer:
>
> The redundancy provided by a RA
Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've started playing with a CF in a bigger machine, and the results
> are rather disappointing. [...]
So I briefly switched the CF cards.
* The SanDisk does on the order of 15 MB/s read, 10 MB/s write in
the amd64. Without monopolizing the CPU
Hello,
I just had a server crash luckily I had all my configurations backed
up. So anyways I restore everything to the same way it was before the
server crash however pf and ftp-proxy isn't working the way it used
to. I installed using the same openbsd cds when I previously installed
it so everyth
My system boots to xdm & I login to ion. Is there any way I could try
out cwm while I am running ion?
Thanks.
64 matches
Mail list logo
